DNA NATIONS!

DNA NATIONS is a concept of nationhood and civic membership based on genetics, genetic group organization rather than geographical place. That is not to say that concern for geographical place/space, natural habitat and physical resource is mutually exclusive, but DNA Nations focuses on coordinating our peoples on the basis of our most essential cross contextual commonality and concern – our genetics. While we may seek real world instantiation by its means, at this point it is a virtual and parallel nation building effort that does not require the sacrifice of one’s current citizenship, whatever advantages and benefit that entails.

This project does recognize the importance of the hermeneutic realm, narrative, conceptual, logics of meaning and action as highly relevant in either directing reconstruction (homeostasis) or deconstruction of our genus and species, or that cultural reconstruction (or misdirection as we might allege), and the its requirement to manage of the homeostasis of our genetic unions, so to speak, to form coalitions where we might with other “unions” but also to coordinate as best we might, including with those who do not organize on the basis of genetics.

Initial permutations of this project sought to accommodate the political concern of maintaining this project in as implicit a manner as possible as this sort of organization has been stigmatized as “racist” in the hallowed liberal zeitgeist and as such we endeavored to present it in the discreet terms that were hard for the zeitgeist to react against; i.e., we presented it in their signature terms of  freedom; viz., freedom of and from association, in order to use liberalism’s greatest valuation against them and make it harder for them to object.

This exploitation of the liberal rule structure for the implicit purpose of freedom from association was part and parcel of James Bowery’s Laboratory of the States platform in which people might vote with their feet, i.e., not announcing their purpose (perhaps racial, who knows?) for moving and gathering with a people of their choosing. People would just move to a place of their liking not making explicit their reasoning and opening themselves to charges of racism.

However, while the matter of racial antagonism has progressed, my own formulation of a “White Post Modern” platform in response has shown to be innocent enough. In these complex circumstances, we have the means for group coherence and accountability; with that, it is not supremacist, eugenecist, Nazi, imperialist, etc., not looking to kill others, rather we want to curate and preserve our own kinds with self corrective (systemic homeostasis) autonomy; and as such, we have the means to coordinate this concern in relation to other human species, non-human species and habitat.

Given the obvious necessity to defend human species and speciation from antagonism and the inadvertent ramifications against speciation from modernity, those reasonable enough to be concerned with the survival of our species should become increasingly more comfortable with the innocence of our anti-supremacist stance, thus capable of taking an explicit stand with the need to be implicit emerging increasingly less important. More and more we may unburden ourselves of the concern to deal with the charge of “racism” implicitly, understanding where it is a false allegation against us, typically an overstated Cartesian absurdity weaponized against classification/organization of our peoples and our benign discrimination thereupon, in defense accordingly; thus, we have unburdened the project of what was, in fact, an incoherent, contradictory concern between the implicit and explicit. We seek to promulgate explicit organization; and there is no reason to be timid about the concern to preserve human kinds any more than we need to be timid about preserving animal kinds, other organic species and habitat.

For we are explicit that autonomy, sovereignty, the self correctivity of our species systems – known as homeostasis – and coordination thereof, which is a broader homeostasis, is what we are after. We are not imperial supremacists, looking to lord ourselves over and exploit others, let alone to kill them.

With the innocence of our objectives explicit and being unburdened of sundry right wing perfidy (which I have and will continue to articulate and critique) we may get right down to a brief re-statement of the project, in which individuals may use the implicit strategy of voting with their feet, if that tact is necessary in their circumstance (likely), while they can coordinate with the DNA Nations project at the same time as it is independent of location and unburdened of any warranted persecution.

That is not to say that people who hate European peoples and others looking to preserve their kinds will never try to antagonize this project, it is just that with its being truly innocent, both I and anybody worth their salt will be willing to take a stand with it – yes, we care to preserve our genetic kinds.

While it is clear that elections, particularly not among a mixed demographic civic nationalism, are not working in our interests, this plan will not require you to sacrifice your citizenship and the benefits you derive as such; rather, it is a parallel, virtual nation building effort, which may spawn concrete implementation later on – hopefully it will, once we are organized well enough to take competent care of people: that’s self correctivity, that’s autonomous functioning, that’s systemic homeostasis.

The DNA Nations – 2020 Update

A preliminary document of the DNA Nations concept to provide the basic specificatory structure to follow up for those who care for the curation of our diverse kinds of people. While our focus is on European peoples, curation for the preservation of our kinds – genus, species – and potential coordination on the basis of genetics, the concept does not preclude negotiating with and some incorporation of mixed kinds, does not prescribe violence, exploitation in any way shape or form and does not preclude non-Europeans from curating their kinds for preservation and working out means for their coordination with European kinds as well.

A union of unions and coalitions thereof based on DNA criteria.

Euro-DNA Nations

James Bowery’s “Laboratory of the States” platform proposes sovereignty of peoples through free choice and free association, as people may “vote with their feet” to establish human ecologies through controlled experimentation. The control would be established through freedom from association—that is, the freedom to not associate with others. However, under the current circumstances, efforts to instantiate these deliberately organized “human ecologies” are best conducted in an implicit manner. Indeed, under the circumstances, they must be largely implicit (for example, due to laws which prohibit realtors from mentioning race to buyers or sellers; Rumford Fair Housing Act etc.). To counter liberal antagonism, Bowery suggests espousing the rubric of their values, i.e., making them live up to their own rules by promoting “our valuation of freedom of choice”. Later, the communities should be able to enforce explicit freedom of and from association.

This freedom from association is corollary to individual freedom of choice and association. Rather than trying to overthrow the liberal zeitgeist of our epoch, Bowery maintains that we ought to hold liberals to their principles. We will respect and grant their valuation of freedom to go/and or be associated with whom they like and we as European peoples expect the same freedom of choice to go/ and or associate with whom we like.

Before we get complaints about ‘prescribing individualism’ or liberalism, this must be understood as a strategy toward gathering our people within the liberal context, using its rules. Moreover, it has more relevance and appeal for the diaspora, forcibly mixed in as they are into unwanted association with a myriad more of alien kinds. Nevertheless, that is not to say that we should take lightly the young person’s “choice” to abandon their people where they might, without us requesting and account and offering what is to us, corrective advice that they stick with their people.

As far as European Americans and other European diaspora go, Bowery has, since his initial proposal for the laboratory of the states platform, concluded that rather than state-sized units, county-sized political units are more optimal—the sheriff and county being the most viable and manageable scale of organization in defense against the nation-state apparatus in its death throes.

I would argue that the initial state is rather a step toward unionization – a virtual and rules based association, though not made formal as a political action group to begin, just an informal union of unions based on voluntary DNA groupings.

Furthermore, Bowery argues that strong valuation of freedom of choice is a distinctly Western characteristic and therefore precious. I concur. He elaborates farther that it is imperative to maintain the unique human ecologies that evolved with this Western characteristic of individual freedom of choice. I concur as well.

However, this freely and deliberately chosen state/county human ecology is very different from the deeply situated, naturally evolving human ecologies of Europe and Russia, where our people have evolved over tens of thousands of years in relation to particular habitats. It is surely critical for us to maintain these ecologies as well. We would not want to be without either the freely chosen state/county-sized ecologies of European diaspora derived by choice within a lifespan, nor without the truly deep, historical ecologies of our European and Russian nations. These are both goods that we would want to maintain, and yet they are very different concerns. This focuses WN on the task of coordination.

We wouldn’t really want to give up either, but how to coordinate these two goods? This is where a Euro-DNA-based nation begins to look like a potential means of coordination, facilitating various concerns and expressions of our native Europeans while never losing sight of their essence.

There is a third crucial matter to coordinate. If a nation of European descended peoples is to have an economy big enough to fund a space program, military defense and other large projects, it will need a size larger than the average state (let alone county) to provide for a sufficient economy; and if the nations of European peoples are to hold up to the growing power of China, they will need to be large.

Thesis: The Euro-DNA Nation would provide a means for coordinating smaller States/Counties, both freely chosen human ecologies and those of deep, historical evolution, while providing the means for pursuing a mutual larger manifestation as well.

Given the anti-White hegemony that European peoples are up against from above, along with the turmoil and throngs of anti-Whites that they are up against on all fronts, an endogenous approach is the most practical for the coordination of European peoples sovereignty.

By endogenous here, we mean from the inside out. That is, in proposing autonomous, sovereign nations of European peoples, we should begin with those who would like to be a part of it first—begin by focusing on what we can do as opposed to what we cannot do. It is endogenous also in that the nation is corporeal, literally of the people—their native European DNA being the prime criterion for inclusion. That would be in contrast, though not in opposition, to other WN nation building efforts using an exogenous (from the outside-in) approach, such as the Northwest Front.

There are clear practical advantages of a native Euro-DNA Nation that begins as a formal declaration of a wish as confirmed by voluntary signatories. Firstly, signing-up would only mean that one is expressing a wish to preserve species of European peoples. It does not require relinquishing one’s current citizenship.

Nor does it mean antagonizing non-Europeans. We may extend the DNA Nation concept and its freedom of association to them as well. But just as the conscientious are concerned for the preservation of genus and species, pervasive ecology, so too is it perfectly legitimate to look after our European kinds.

For whom it may concern, the indigenous Euro-DNA Nation focuses from the start on our most precious concern, our DNA, while not encumbering us with present obstacles to land-situated nations. The Euro-DNA Nation would be virtual and non-situated in the beginning (and to some extent always).

However, DNA without any claim to land, without habitat indefinitely, would be problematic for a number of reasons. Therefore, it must be an objective of the Euro-DNA Nation to establish sacrosanct Nation “lands” for specific Euro-DNA eventually; the plurality of the term “lands” is a deliberate usage. In fact, more safety and resources would be provided if these lands are non-contiguous and disbursed throughout the world. Naturally, WN would seek to re-establish our traditional territories as European, particularly those in Europe, but would also seek to secure sovereign territory in North America, South America, Russia, Australia and New Zealand. Nevertheless, in not being strictly contingent on obtaining land, the nation is rendered more flexible and more practical so that it can start with land claims of any size, even small claims.

Considering the problem secondly in terms of how to coordinate WN of its largest possible size, it also provides a highly practical means to instantiate a goal for protracted expanse, as it is highly flexible in its viability to cover territory, not being restricted by land boundaries; but rather comporting the boundaries with the DNA.

Thus it moves with facility through coordination of Bowery’s “Laboratory of the States” platform and its freely chosen association by means of the DNA Nations, whereof people might select various native European sub-categories (if they match), some distinct, some perhaps blended in various ways and degrees. Once coordinated as such along with the ancient European nations, its flexibility facilitates striving to cover the largest land-masses possible (or necessary, lest we sound imperialist).

The DNA Nation is also practical in that it does not require unnecessary risk and engagement on the part of participants. Signing-up does not render one complicit with illegal activity of any kind. It only means an expressed wish for the preservation of human species and their necessary sovereignty for that regard.

If you wish to express a wish that you might one day be a part of this project for the preservation of human species, that is the Euro-DNA Nation, you may indicate your haplogroups (no need for your name and other information yet, if you are not comfortable); and specify particular category/union as you wish. DNA proof will ultimately be required for consideration of membership of that group.

A list of Native European-DNA Nation categories and subcategories, genus and species will be provided for you to consider.

……

It is appropriate to make a note at this point that although this particular project focuses on the material fact of genetics and genetic similarity and distance, the DNA Nations platform is based in White Post Modern philosophy which deals effectively with scientistic and ideological estrangement, recognizing that the true concern of the post modern project is to preserve human species against the wreckages of ignorant ethnocentric traditions or the rough shod of modernity, particularly as weaponized against group systemic homeostasis. With that, the necessity of the non-Cartesian, hermeneutic turn (not to leave non-Cartesian emergentism to its own devices). It defends against these antagonisms through a re centralization of praxis (our people groups), taking us back from Cartesian estrangement into accountability and correctivity of our relative group interests; while respecting the findings of objective inquiry as necessary (including the objectivity of subjective concern), it is seen as necessary feedback on the default calibration of our people’s relative group interests: with our world view instantiated as such we may look after the systemic homeostasis of our species and coordinate with others as well. I will be talking about this – as ever.