Conspiracy theorist David McGowan shows the signs of post-hypnotic suggestion in order to get him to do something: to distract from the crucial White male motive of the Viet Nam era: Dasein.
This motive was more than legitimate and it is still vital to reclaim to this day. Had the “hippies” been more articulate it would have been called midt-dasein – there being amidst the class.
As this conspiracy of conspiracy theory goes, the powers that be want so badly to cover that motive that they’ve got McGowan working under post-hypnotic suggestion to spin a 20 some-odd part saga about how the hippies were a complete CIA operation from top to bottom. For those who want to believe that Jim Morrison was a CIA agent instead of a spoiled, drunken kid, feel free to indulge in McGowan’s narrative. You will also find many hide-bound traditional men and women looking to find the hippies an easy excuse for everything that has gone wrong. That would appeal to these kinds who are ready to have you go to war for any excuse that Israel can give – they are unwittingly participating in a diversion from Jewish and oligarch culpability and from the legitimacy and importance of the White male motive of the time.
What suggests that there could actually have been a conspiracy to get this guy to render this conspiracy theory? Let’s focus on one salient example:
Look at his discussion of the Altamont incident, when during the Rolling Stones performance, Hunter Meredith was stabbed to death by a Hell’s Angel.
McGowan says:
“Many of the accounts of the tragedy at Altamont include the demonstrably false claim that Hunter can unmistakably be seen drawing a gun just before being jumped and killed by the Angels (some accounts even have Hunter firing the alleged gun). The relevant frames from the film are included here for your review. What can certainly be fairly clearly seen is the large knife being brought down into Hunter’s back. But a gun being brandished by Mr. Hunter? If you can see one, then you either have far better eyes than I, or a far more active imagination. Or both.”
The fascinating thing is, you can clearly see the gun in Hunter Meredith’s hand.
http://www.davesweb.cnchost.com/nwsltr106.html
Just as you will see people under post-hypnotic suggestion say, skip a number that they have been told to forget, McGowan is apparently defying you to not see a gun that you can see plain as day.
If you go through his articles you will see him point to hidden “racist” motives, such as the “tragic” killing of Meredith Hunter, who “did not really have a gun.”
He mentions “racism” among hippies a number of times, but never does he suggest Jewish underhandedness as playing a part in our social problems – not anywhere in his essays.
He claims there was no organic motive for the men of the time, asserting that war protest was not even prominent in the songs of the era: “For What it’s Worth?” he says, “was the biggest protest song and it was about riots surrounding the closing of a music bar, Pandora’s Box, not about Viet Nam at all.”
McGowan conveniently overlooks one of Woodstock’s signature moments:
Feel Like I’m Fixin’ To Die Rag*:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9HVACPv_KFw
Gentlemen, this is not about making pacifists of us, but about fighting for the right thing, our people, and valuing ourselves enough to do that – ourselves as men as well – our being, specifically our there-being amidst the class of Europeans.
It is about warranting our midtdasein, particularly for White men – a most crucial feature of our ontology.
* Naturally, that there was a draft during the Viet Nam war makes a big difference in organic motivation for White men to be against the war. Hence, this song, encouraging defiance against the draft, does not represent coercion into alien motives despite the fact that it was written by the all too kosher Country Joe and the Fish.
The issue of trivializing or even singling out Hippies for blame as to where things went wrong, obfuscating or diverting from their true motives by imputing trivial or radical Marxist/Jewish political agendas to them is deeply troubling for two fundamental reasons.
Firstly, the motive beneath, though not scarcely articulated by the hippies themselves, was then and still is now about the most important issue for White people, i.e, European peoples, that is, the Being of White men, the fundametnal right of White men to Be. Now, there is no such right in nature, but of Praxis, some intrinsic value Can and Should be accorded White men – innocent until proven guilty – by virtue of the fact that he is a part of our evolution that has survived up until this point, he shall be accorded a certain value and right of birth as part of our social capital. He shall not be considered merely expendable until his proves himself “a man” by some arbitrary tradition or notion of universal maturity.
The warrantable assertion of this, most fundamental concern, to establish our basic right to exist as a people, which is to be asserted against the naturally and historical/traditionally challenged claim that males (in our case, White males) should have no such basic right, but must prove themselves, remains fundamental to this day.
This is not to be confused with saying that all White men should grow their hair long, smoke weed, wear love beads and flash peace signs.
But even more poignantly, the meaning of the hippie movement (Dasein for White males) should not be allowed to be obfuscated by Jewish interests through their media, making suggestions that are lapped-up by right wingers that it was all about drugs and “free love” the shallow end, while it about black Civil Rights, and radical black power on the “deep end.”
…the male motive further obfuscated when the draft was over and the Jewish media could step up the promotion of Feminism, portraying women as disadvantaged across the board.
These were Jewish impositions, affectations to unarticulated motive of White male Dasein and we should not allow them to fool our people, as our Right Wing reactionaries (obnoxiously, trad women) are wont to blame Hippies. It is a diversion that Jewry has in order to not only blame White men, but distract people from the true meaning and profundity beneath the Hippie movement – Dasein for White men.
But very importantly, the White male motive of Hippies, that they not be considered so intrinsically valueless as to have to prove their “manhood” by going to into a war like Vietnam, where there was no clear and present danger to his people, should not be confused with endorsing absolute pacifism, peace at any cost.
The issue is whether or not the borders and bounds of your people are being attacked – if our borders and bounds are being attacked, then it is in line with your Being to fight, and indeed, more incumbent upon males to step up to the fight.
………………
A good comment on this observation as to the essential meaning and motive of the hippie movement (it’s being an organic movment for dasein/midtdasein for White men):
I always like to be reminded that my assessment of the times and its meaning as opposed to what we’re told it was about by MSM found agreement in the following comment by a Vietnam vet – it was written in the context of an article by Richard Spencer at the original Alternative Right site. Needless to say, Richard’s assessment of the times wasn’t very deep –
A Vietnam vet calling himself Lonejack agreed with my assessment:
Agree.
As a VN vet, I can attest to most of what you say. The effects of the VN-era conscription – that is, having been forced into slave-soldiering in a non-White country’s civil war orchestrated by bankers and corporations, having absolutely nothing to do with the actual defense of a White homeland, and calculatingly prosecuted by LBJ and his Ivy League YKW intelligentsia with absolutely no intent of military victory – reverberate to this day among the White guys who were in our late teens and early twenties during the 60’s, more than 50 thousand of whom died in combat, many of whom were captured and tortured, and hundreds of thousands of whom returned maimed, grossly disfigured, and/or dysfunctional only to be vilified, upon their return, by many elements of the society which sent them.
When I returned from overseas, my drop-out from family and society into the flower-child milieu had little to do with civil rights or free love. BTW I do not begrudge those who emigrated to Canada to avoid the draft. And, for those interested, the works of author Tim O’Brien, who “served” an extended “tour of duty” as an infantryman in SVN, are richly descriptive, compelling, and well written IMO.
Commenters on this site (Alternative Right) and in other threads who incessantly demand the boomers to go fuck or shoot themselves, while they themselves consider employment with the Navy, CIA, SS, or some other corrupt, terrorist, anti-White ZOG organ of the NWO agenda – as though such employment would be anything more than a convenient way to escape a tough job market – do, I confess, grate. Why on earth would they willingly collaborate with evil, when alternatives, difficult though they be, are available?
My 2-bit rant.
Thank You
Lonejack
……………………………………………..
Here is an update on the matter when recently Ramzpaul and Styxhexenhammer screwed with the issue, as Right-wingers are wont to do:
Useful idiots do the work of enemies: Ramzpaul & Styx comment on “hippies” & “revolution fatigue”
Superchat question (52:40): “I wonder at what point we have to choose to either digest these people in our society, as the hippies were in the ‘70’s, or to understand that their culture and mores are indigestible and must be cast out of our society.”
Styx (53:01) “You mean the far leftists? Well, they’re already being…
Ramzpaul (53:38): “And your point about the hippies is good, because, I did a video about this (”Revolution Fatigue”), why you have to catch the momentum…I think the left, these radicals, they think they’re going to have a revolution like its 1917 Russia or its The French Revolution..or they think they’re in Weimar Germany and they’re fighting the Nazis. But see, that type of thing, there’s a lot of differences and you need to really make it happen pretty quick. Whereas I remember, I don’t remember, but I read about the late 60’s, early 70’s, there was like The Weather Underground, they thought they were going to topple the United States and have a revolution. But by the time that I got to university in 1981, they were already considered very dated…people who had that mindset were considered old.
DanielS:
Your understanding of “hippies” is idiotic. The Weather Underground were not hippies. The hippies were not Marxists in their essential motive; in fact, they were notoriously frustrating to Marxist revolutionaries. It matters, because the adversaries of Whites love to blame hippies; it is a way to blame White men as opposed to the culpability of liberal/Marxist programs spearheaded by Jewry; and because they wish to turn White right wing dolts against their own people, while burying an understanding of the profundity of the hippie motive for White men: a fundamental and profoundly important motive on behalf of White male Being / (Dasein/MidtDasein for White men especially) as opposed to their being considered so intrinsically valueless as to have to go to war in Vietnam, exploited for the custom, habit and tradition of their gender role as obligated to war – even in this case, where there was no clear and immanent danger to them and their people; where there could have been other means of dealing with Vietnam rather than conventional war).
A White ethnonational left would not be in “revolutionary” mode where the interests of our union – a union of our people – are being served by those in power. If they are not, i.e., if our interests are not served, then we would seek revolutionary transformation so that the union of our European peoples are secured. This is a big difference between a White ethnonational left and the Marxist, internationalist left. When our ethnonationalist union is secured, we are no longer in revolutionary, transformative mode, but are, rather, elaborative and self corrective.
Note that the hippie epoch lost all impetus once the Vietnam draft was over….
The grievance that caused “the hippie union” “to strike” against the powers and ways that be had been “settled.”
The Beatles, “Revolution” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BGLGzRXY5Bw
Ramzpaul and Sytx are weird and annoying in their very insistence upon normalizing Jewish discourse.
_____________
For the sake of invoking a provocative perspective, I would like to momentarily change the pronoun in the anti-war song, “Walking in Space”, from “how dare THEY try to end this beauty, to how dare SHE try to end this beauty…
How dare she try, to end this beauty…
Right wing women who go along with the Jewish cover-up –
– ignoring the underlying motive of the hippies and wanting to blame them instead for having created “our problems”, suggesting that men should man-up in universal maturity, rather than manning-up to create group boundaries (e.g., by unionization process), or manning-up where our people’s boundaries are violated (as opposed to the other side of the world, in Vietnam, nowhere near our people’s boundaries, or where Jewish/Israeli boundaries are threatened)
– are particularly annoying…
While one can glean the Hippie motive indirectly through the eclectic haze of the rock opera, Hair, generally, by songs like Walking in Space, the gender aspect and the fact of the matter being about White Male Being is only faintly and trivially alluded to with the song, “My Conviction“.
I also interpose the pronoun change to suggest that this valuation of impervious confidence to the sacrifice of intellectual, critical apprehension of the power’s directives is a tendency in female predilection, and that the hippie movement was a (un-articulated intellectual/political) White male motive by balancing contrast to female valuation, e.g. of sheer confidence.
This also suggests a “foundational” reason as to why intrinsic value should be attributed to White males, for their perspective, as its predilections can, if anything, be better than female predilections; but in any event, provide a necessary systemic corrective in balancing the human ecology of European peoples.
Again, this momentary pronoun change is provocative. Of course women aren’t to blame for men getting sent to Vietnam to kill and die. However, traditional gender roles could have destructive consequences for men as well (second wave feminism kicking off in the 60’s as well), when hidebound, “foundationally” inflexible to the natural emergence and interactive development of White masculinity and its requirements (in praxis).
Posted by DanielS on Sun, 09 Aug 2020 08:34 | #
For the sake of invoking a provocative perspective, I would like to momentarily change the pronoun in the anti-war song, “Walking in Space”, from “how dare THEY try to end this beauty, to how dare SHE try to end this beauty…
…How dare she try, to end this beauty… right wing women who go along with the Jewish cover-up – ignoring the underlying motive of the hippies and wanting to blame them instead for having created “our problems”, suggesting that men should man-up in universal maturity, rather than manning-up to create group boundaries (e.g., by unionization process), or manning-up where our people’s boundaries are violated (as opposed to the other side of the world, in Vietnam, nowhere near our people’s boundaries, of where Jewish/Israeli boundaries are threatened) – are particularly annoying…
I also interpose the pronoun change to suggest that this valuation of impervious confidence to the sacrifice of intellectual, critical apprehension of the power’s directives is a tendency in female predilection, and that the hippie movement was a (un-articulated intellectual/political) White male motive by balancing contrast to female valuation, e.g. of sheer confidence.
This also suggests a “foundational” reason as to why intrinsic value should be attributed to White males, for their perspective, as its predilections can, if anything, be better than female predilections; but in any event, provide a necessary systemic corrective in balancing the human ecology of European peoples.
Again, this momentary pronoun change is provocative. Of course women are not to blame for men getting sent to Vietnam to kill and die. However, traditional gender roles could have destructive consequences for men as well (second wave feminism kicking off in the 60’s as well), when hidebound, “foundationally” inflexible to the natural emergence and interactive development of White masculinity and its requirements (in praxis).
…….
Below is an old post on the same topic, from a slightly different angle: in response to some right winger criticism of the hippies. Though it is an old post, from 2014, there isn’t much that I need to update [(and I will in bold and brackets, where updating of information is necessary)].
………
Apollo & Dionysus:
Were Hippies Protesting the Moon Landing, Ayn?
Ayn Rand compared what she said were the “Sex, Drugs and Rock n’ Roll values – ‘the hippie motives’ on display at Woodstock” to The Apollo 11 project, which had legions of well behaved admirers who descended upon Cape Canaveral to observe its event.
Now, if we couldn’t expect hippies, not even John Lennon, to be articulate of what was important about the hippie motive how can we expect Don Black and right wing cohorts to be articulate of their motives?
Don says Timothy Leary was the poster hippie boy with the emblematic phrase, “tune in turn on and drop out.” Not exactly.
And his colleague, “Don Advo,” preferred Ayn Rand’s take on hippies in “Apollo and Dionysus,” disparaging hippies by contrast to achieving technocrats, viz. contrasting the Apollo astronauts and witnesses to the Dionysian Woodstock performers and crowd.
But whereas Any Rand’s individualist objectivism was motivated to rupture the communality and other organization of European peoples by contrasting it with “heroic” but disingenuous individualism, the hippies did have a very important motive which is continually skirted-over by those who ignore the background of The Vietnam War Draft.
In rebellion against the draft, hippies were there at Woodstock, singing..
“Well, come on all of you, big strong men, Uncle Sam needs your help again. Yeah, he’s got himself in a terrible jam way down yonder in Vietnam. So put down your books and pick up a gun, gonna have a whole lotta fun.. and its one, two, three…
What are we fighting for? Don’t ask me I don’t give a damn, next stop is Vietnam”..
“Ain’t no time to wonder why (Being, midtdasein, nah!) whoopee! we’re all gonna die!
Yeah, come on Wall Street, don’t be slow, why man, this is war au-go-go
Plenty good money to be made by supplying the army with the tools of its trade”
..and wondering like, how about V2 rockets re-directed for a peaceful mission?
In all seriousness…
No, the hippies were not protesting The Apollo 11 moon landing!
Their fundamental project was very significant in the advance of European peoples – a quest for midt-dasein – communal being amidst the class of one’s people for White males – as opposed to having those basic levels on the hierarchy of needs sacrificed by males in deprivation and privation; where a few males might make it through the stress to the higher reaches (often transformed into sociopaths for the effort), to the higher aims on the hierarchy of needs – e.g., exploring the moon. To where in fact, these traditional trade-offs in gender differentiation were exploited and exaggerated beyond reason.
Sacrificial White males on the way, as in Vietnam, no matter how needless, be damned.
The point is, these motives/needs should not and ultimately, in fact, cannot be mutually exclusive, but must be balanced in optimality. The hippies were not protesting the Apollo landing. They reasonably sought organicism and being in balance to technology. However, they might upset a Jew like Ayn Rand because they were insisting that the intrinsic value of White men – White male midt-dasein – be recognized, in fact its institution was/is a necessary priority.
But the hippies were inarticulate of that motive. Moreover, requisite to their motive of midtdasein was “racism” * – i.e., social classification and necessary discrimination thereof, duty when mature to guard the boundaries thereof – there is no being in one’s group without discriminating against its antagonists – ironically prohibited with the newly mis-coined “civil rights” making such requisite discrimination into a veritable taboo and largely illegal in fact. Needless to say that was hard to articulate at the time as it is still now. Midtdasein’s articulation was made yet harder by the fact that it could easily be emasculated against the traditional role/motive for males to quest after the top of the hierarchy and man-up in sacrificing the basic needs of the hierarchy. Furthermore, turning back from actualizing the top of the hierarchy apparently belied the whole American project as the “land of opportunity.” Indeed, White males would not necessarily want to sacrifice the possibility for the top of the hierarchy either. Nor would they want to sacrifice the middle – relationships with co-evolutionary women:
Sharon
..finally, they absolutely needed the basics on the hierarchy of needs if anything was to be possible for them. Indeed, how dare the powers-that-be try to end this beauty?
Doors locked (doors locked)
Blinds pulled (blinds pulled)
Lights low (lights low)
Flames high (flames high)My body (my body)
My bodyMy body (my body)
My bodyMy body
Is walking in space
My soul is in orbit
With God face to faceFloating, flipping
Flying, trippingTripping from Pottsville to Mainline
Tripping from Mainline to Moonville(Tripping from “Pot”sville to Starlight
Tripping from Starlight to Moonville)On a rocket to
The Fourth Dimension
Total self awareness
The intentionMy mind is as clear as country air
I feel my flesh, all colors meshRed black
Blue brown
Yellow crimson
Green orange
Purple pink
Violet white
White white
White white
White whiteAll the clouds are cumuloft
Walking in space
Oh my God your skin is soft
I love your face
How dare they try to end this beauty?
How dare they try to end this beauty?To keep us under foot
They bury us in soot
Pretending it’s a chore
To ship us off to warIn this dive
We rediscover sensation
In this dive
We rediscover sensationWalking in space
We find the purpose of peace
The beauty of life
You can no longer hideOur eyes are open
Our eyes are open
Our eyes are open
Our eyes are open
Wide wide wide!
“That is ‘my conviction..”
Still, we hear how hedonistic and bad these people were by people who want to blame White men and associate them with Jewish affectations of the era.
Articulating the motive of White male midtdasein was further complicated by its incommensurability and confusion with Jewish interests and right-wing interests – who sought to associate it with the Jewish radical agenda of Marxism: expressed as imposed liberalism for Whites but by contrast to that relaxation of vigilance, a unionized activism for non-Whites against Whites – the prim “civil rights” and upwardly black power totally incommensurate with White male midtdasein. As was Marcuse’s “free love and “poly- morphous perversion” incommensurate with White male midtdasein, especially as bounds of accountability and human ecology were ruptured as “violation of ‘civil rights”
The second wave of feminism, another thing wrongly correlated with hippies, was also in fact incommensurate, quite literally incommensurate with White male midtdasein.
In fact, it was the thesis of Betty Friedan, leading exponent of that second wave of feminism, that in order to be healthy, full and free, women needed access to the higher levels of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs.
It is apparent how the “high grumbles” which Maslow called higher needs on the hierarchy, and as feminists who followed Friedan’s thesis would espouse, could cause extreme friction between White women and White men, who had the “low grumbles” of not wanting to be treated as being so intrinsically valueless as to have to be subject to a draft and die in a senseless foreign war of aggression; and rather than being left alone in peace, being amidst the class of their people, were subject in still further violation thereof – violation of their freedom from association with outsiders as imposed by “civil rights” – violation of freedom from association, violation of midtdasein – taking away the most basic freedom of White men.
Of course Ayn Rand did not like Hippies, they were motioning to group, communal organization of Whites and care that included White male being as an intrinsic value – god forbid they would heal in organic and communal being, to be anything but sheer individuals who would stand no chance against her tribe’s hegemony and impositions.
* Needless to say, along with hippies, Ayn Rand found “racism” appalling – disCusting!
Sometime back a fellow calling himself Lonejack agreed with my assessment:
Agree.
As a VN vet, I can attest to most of what you say. The effects of the VN-era conscription – that is, having been forced into slave-soldiering in a non-White country’s civil war orchestrated by bankers and corporations, having absolutely nothing to do with the actual defense of a White homeland, and calculatingly prosecuted by LBJ and his Ivy League YKW intelligentsia with absolutely no intent of military victory – reverberate to this day among the White guys who were in our late teens and early twenties during the 60’s, more than 50 thousand of whom died in combat, many of whom were captured and tortured, and hundreds of thousands of whom returned maimed, grossly disfigured, and/or dysfunctional only to be vilified, upon their return, by many elements of the society which sent them.
When I returned from overseas, my drop-out from family and society into the flower-child milieu had little to do with civil rights or free love. BTW I do not begrudge those who emigrated to Canada to avoid the draft. And, for those interested, the works of author Tim O’Brien, who “served” an extended “tour of duty” as an infantryman in SVN, are richly descriptive, compelling, and well written IMO.
Commenters on this site (Alt Right) and in other threads who incessantly demand the boomers to go fuck or shoot themselves, while they themselves consider employment with the Navy, CIA, SS, or some other corrupt, terrorist, anti-White ZOG organ of the NWO agenda – as though such employment would be anything more than a convenient way to escape a tough job market – do, I confess, grate. Why on earth would they willingly collaborate with evil, when alternatives, difficult though they be, are available?
My 2-bit rant.
Thank You Lonejack
What we don’t want to be fighting for … and a good example of why Being and ordinary routine is to be valued in and of White men as opposed to the custom and habit of war …the corporations and (((operation clean sweep))):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sYv0k86hp4A
Posted by DanielS on Fri, 19 Nov 2021 22:36 | #
After having experienced it for years, I can’t help but be on guard for Guessedworker to misdirect and try to trivialize my efforts. Naturally, the Thorn committee are eager to compound the burial and obfuscation.
Perhaps that’s why comments have been ongoing in my old Trout Mask Post – the old TOP and TOOP business strategy (trivialize/minimize the “product” of the competitor) to have people associate me with that idea only (and of course, not at its most articulate). Or perhaps I should be grateful that people enjoy the post… it does make one (of many) important points that I’ve made.
Of course my discussion of hippies was never about peace in any case, but about Being/Dasein and MidtDasen (Being amidst one’s people) where there is no clear and immanent danger to one’s people; when conscription is only a matter of custom and habit, to where men are taken as expendable in unnecessary war.
The intrinsic value of White males – Being/Dasein/MidtDasein – was a profound and unarticulated motive beneath the hippie manifestation; and it remains a central concern, unarticulated (pretty much except by me) to this day – i.e., to assert the intrinsic value of White men; a degree in right to life which is not merely expendable, rather to be respected and valued; only called into lethal service where there is a clear and immanent threat to his people.
Very much in the manner of Thorn’s Jewish gods, he would obfuscate this profundity of the hippies underlying motive for White men, reducing it to “nothing more than pursuing fun, sex, drugs and rock n’ roll”, taking advantage of the fact that the hippies were in fact inarticulate of their fundamental motive (while Thorn would redirect authority back to his right wing Jewish Abrahamism, and the obfuscating Jewish program that has ever prevailed regarding the motives of that era).
As I have noted many times, (((civil rights))) was not a hippie concern, “free love” ((())) was an affectation brought on by the likes of Herbert Marcuse, as that free for all could never be conducive to Being for men.
Drugs were another matter; some were conducive to getting in touch with organic Being, others in kind or over use, were destructive. But again, the hippies were inarticulate, by definition almost, as Being is a matter of organic synthesis not analysis.
Saturday Night Live was/is a Jewish show. Though it started off hippy-ish, it had nothing to do with the onset of disco; nevertheless more and more showed its Jewishness as it aired through the years, to where it was so obnoxious as to be unwatchable after the first few years.
Coming back to GW’s TOP and TOOP business…
Guessedworker says: “Daniel was very good on that period, and helped me to understand that it was not “the left” that wanted peace but all of us. And that was our right. The left, of course, wanted conquest. Peace was just a means to that, as everything is.”
Again, (DanielS speaking again): the essential motive was not peace at any cost, but against conscription as a matter of custom and habit; and where the draft was invoked in Being toward death, as in the case of Vietnam, it unearthed a call for intrinsic valuation of White male life – Dasein/MidtDasein; not to be expended in war that represented no clear and immanent danger to his people.
Count me out of association with the Jewish marketing program of a characterology of “the left”. If you were invoking my name in context and specifying the distinction that I make of an international, Marxist left (and anti-White Left), I’d raise no objection.
Posted by DanielS on Sat, 20 Nov 2021 05:42 | #
Correction:
Especially when attributing “intrinsic value” to White men, it is necessary to discuss, perhaps emphasize emergent qualities (along with the reconstructive Dasein/MidtDasein). Hat tip to GW for maintaining that vigil.
The intrinsic value of White males – Being/Dasein/MidtDasein – was a profound and unarticulated motive beneath the hippie manifestation; and it remains a central concern, unarticulated (pretty much except by me) to this day – i.e., to assert the intrinsic value of White men; a degree in right to life which is not merely expendable, rather to be respected and valued; only called into lethal service where there is a clear and immanent threat to his people.
The intrinsic value of White males – Being/Dasein/MidtDasein – was a profound and unarticulated motive beneath the hippie manifestation; and it remains a central concern, unarticulated (pretty much except by me) to this day – i.e., to assert the intrinsic value of White men; a degree in right to life which is not merely expendable, rather to be respected and valued; only called into lethal service where there is a clear and immanent threat to his people. But especially when attributing “intrinsic value” to White men, it is necessary to discuss, perhaps emphasize emergent qualities (along with the reconstructive Dasein/MidtDasein). Hat tip to GW for maintaining the vigil on emergentism.
* Note, emergentims, like hermeneutics,is anti-Cartesian.
Author Justine Brown on her experience growing up in “hippie communes”
https://odysee.com/@JollyHeretic:d/Hippie-Commune-Raised-Author-Justine-Brown-Joins-Us-for-a-Drink,-Man-.-.-.:d
@daniel.sienkiewicz
4 minutes ago
Fritz Perls, “Gestalt authenticity” was not German, he was Jewish.
Herbert Marcuse was Jewish, of Frankfurt school infamy, and oblivious to the fundamental and profound motive of Hippiedom, Being (Dasein/Midtdasein) for White males as opposed to being intrinsically valueless cannon fodder for war, even where no clear and immanent danger to one’s people and being. Marcuse imposed a false association, “free love” and “polymorphous perversion”, associating it with the hippie movement – when in fact, “free love” is the opposite of Being/Midtdasein for males.
However, Ms Brown does add some articulation to a tragically unarticulated and (((misrepresented))) movement, the hippies. I particularly liked where she observed the dark, organic, natural side of human nature that the hippies, in their motive for organic Being were unprepared for; and that is true. that is why I proffer socialization as the most fundamental motive, even below organic being. Socialization, i.e., the unionized delimitation of one’s social group/ nation praxis, would socialize people with strong rules that monogamy is to be respected as a sacred option and /or not introducing alien hostile elements through sexual adventure.
Commenting in response to a podcast and a right wing (in this case, convert to Catholicism) asshole under the podcast thread: Aesthetic Stagnation & Dissidence (w/ Josh Neal, Gio Pennacchietti and Donald Kent): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zBZr7xoRyY8&lc=UgxA1q_7kijx9PrzYUB4AaABAg.9NSdkFoDF0b9NVsnjVXKx
4
Daniel Sienkiewicz
1 day ago
“peace and love and all this other bullshit?” … like Being toward death in Vietnam, like an arrogant, ignorant Australian might not be able to relate to: Black Sabbath came before the hippie stuff? This stuff is too important for lightweights to mangle.
2
Judge Holden
1 day ago (edited)
>taking boomer pop-culture seriously
4
Daniel Sienkiewicz
1 day ago
@Judge Holden I’ve discussed it many times; it is an issue that is much deeper than the boomers, and typical of them, they did not understand it, even thought it was manifesting through them in the hippie expression. That is not to endorse the particular hippie expression, but what it signified: nothing more important for White men and European peoples. If it was hard for Americans to grasp, its even harder for Europeans and Australians to grasp the relevance under the clouds of redirection into “civil rights”, “feminism” and “free love”
5
Judge Holden
1 day ago (edited)
@Daniel Sienkiewicz so what are you trying to say? That the 60s cultural revolution on Liberal countries was actually an expression of European spirit or soul(albeit exploited), rather than something completely manufactured that was imposed on our society? What relevance are you suggesting?
3
Paul-talk
14 hours ago
@Judge Holden … that’s a pertinent question….
The seriousness of these kids is a refreshing contrast to the…. ‘sincerity’ of the hippies, but….
Daniel Sienkiewicz
4 hours ago
@Paul-talk There is nothing refreshing about what they are saying.
this response of mine has been deleted twice:
I am not “trying” to say something, I AM saying, and have been saying in several articles that the hippie movement was an expression, albeit unarticulated, of Dasein/Mitdasein for White males in particular; and that it was incommensurate, as a motive, with feminism, black power, black civil rights and overcompensating traditional gender roles. It was granted some slack, but completely buried after the Vietnam war was over. You don’t “fake” being toward death in the Vietnam draft. McGowan’s MK Ultra bit doesn’t hold up
1
Paul-talk
3 hours ago
@Daniel Sienkiewicz were you a hippy? I was a bit young (born 1956) but l was arround lots of hippys – my father was a sort of guru to a bunch of them… It was fairly pathetic…
Daniel Sienkiewicz
2 hours ago
@Paul-talk I am not defending their political incapacity, they were inarticulate, pathetic yes, but a manifestation of something profound that was, in partial defense of them, difficult to articulate.
1
Paul-talk
Highlighted reply
Paul-talk
2 hours ago
@Daniel Sienkiewicz … Well, you’ll have to explain that too me very well, cause l saw a bunch of self indulgent, nihilistic and phony idealists.
Daniel Sienkiewicz
2 hours ago (edited)
Furthermore, though I experienced them as a child, I did not find them to be effeminate, mere pacifists. I do not trust people who rail against the hippies, burying their implicit White male motive under YKW propaganda, whether from a liberal, or a right wing and trad woman perspective. The hippie motive for White male being did not represent the full, necessary, social systemic process and was not mutually excusive to it, but their motive was and IS, the necessary, neglected step for White/European sovereignty to this day. I do not trust anyone who would try to obfuscate this.
This next comment was somehow removed from the thread. I reposted it. Let’s see if they take it down:
White male Being (Dasien/MidtDasein) is difficult to articulate because it is a synthetic, most fundamental organic motive, not an analytic motive; to compound that difficulty, it is stigmatic to articulate from a Trad male and female perspective; and of course, the YKW will do everything they can to obfuscate and make that articulation more difficult – saying it was all about self indulgence, or civil rights, or feminism and what we need is the good old Abrahamic yoke (or Hitler to punish the their diaspora).
I have added significant text content to this post from the point onward where you might find this in your search drop down:
The issue of trivializing or even singling out Hippies for blame as to where things went wrong, obfuscating or diverting from their true motives by imputing trivial or radical Marxist/Jewish political agendas to them is deeply troubling for two fundamental reasons.