It takes no more than a glance at its statutes. One goes into an American institution and sees a placard looming overhead declaring “discrimination on the basis of race, color, creed, national origin…” to be illegal. Suddenly seeing discrimination rendered pejorative, illegal even, one experiences a vague feeling of dread.
You sense immediately that you are being told not to have so much as eyeballs by way of discriminatory capacity. You are to be utterly defenseless against biological antagonists, to have no present recourse against the destruction of that which is most important.
It was the ultimate YKW perversion of terms — civil rights, freedom and discrimination — culminating in the Civil Rights Act of 1964: Even a cursory glance over its statutes reveals obsolescence, disingenuousness and evil.
Discrimination! Is Prohibited by Order
The Civil Rights Act of 1964
I) Barred unequal application of voter registration requirements. II) Outlawed discrimination based on race, color, religion or national origin in hotels, motels, restaurants, theaters, and all other public accommodations engaged in interstate commerce; exempted private clubs without defining the term “private.” III) Prohibited state and municipal governments from denying access to public facilities on grounds of race, color, religion or national origin. IV) Encouraged the desegregation of public schools and authorized the U.S. Attorney General to file suits to enforce said act. V) Expanded the Civil Rights Commission established by the earlier Civil Rights Act. VI) Prevents discrimination by government agencies that receive federal funds. If an agency is found in violation of Title VI, that agency may lose its federal funding. VII) Prohibits discrimination by covered employers on the basis of race, color, religion, sex or national origin. Title VII also prohibits discrimination against an individual because of his or her association with another individual of a particular race, color, religion, sex, or national origin, such as by an interracial marriage.
…”such as by an interracial marriage.”
“Civil Rights” as enacted 1964 was a horror more like civil wrongs – a (((weaponization))) of Modernity’s objectivism written into the U.S. Constitution in the form of the Cartesian, viz., Locketine empirical side, imposed to purity spiral against White group classification – in the manner of making Whites “live up to their rules” Saul Alinsky style (Rules for Radicals) – viz. live up to their pure objectivist ideals, as Whites; to lead the way by self sacrificial example of civil individual rights prevailing against would-be discriminatory classification on their own behalf; thereby overriding and rupturing the organizing and structuring of accountability to group interests of themselves and their posterity.
I assumed in my young age that it would be my prerogative one day, and that sane people would make the same choice. How could I believe that others, women especially, could do other than legitimate separatism after seeing such things?
The origins of America’s Cartesian purity spiral of civil individual rights are with John Locke, the empirical philosopher who went into a purity spiral on the empirical side of the Cartesian divide for his resentment of the privileged educational opportunities of the British Aristocratic class.
His interests thus dovetailed with a purity spiral on the empirical side of the Cartesian philosophy that he cultivated to assert that all individuals have the same perceptions and therefore social group classifications are a fiction of the mind, a fiction at the disposal of the unjust elite, which should give way to civil individual rights – all individuals granted an equal opportunity as opposed to group classificatory discrimination.
This Cartesian rupture of group pattern differences and qualitative, niche symbiotic positioning of life-spans amongst was bad enough.
But then it was weaponized by the YKW in the spiral of pure individualism imposed upon Whites with a corresponding prohibition of White group discriminatory practice – a prohibition amplified in subsequent decades with an increasingly intense and pervasive campaign against “racism” – which basically means prohibition of White group classification and discrimination thereupon.
While I’ve endeavored to sort out this egregious weaponization of Locke’s Cartesian purity spiral and (((the red caping))) of what would be several aspects of post modern corrective – what I call White Post Modernity – in order to distinguish it from the misleading Jewish and liberal adopted red capes of post modernity, the correctives that I have set forth have not been appreciated yet.
In fact, some largely intelligent advocates and orbiters of White advocacy, such as the Z-man, remain more given to play opposite day with the correctives provided of my platform; and this is indeed the idea of the red caping: to get Whites to either attack or react against concepts (which, if understood as they are supposed to be) are conceived for their own interests.
If you really care about people of European extraction (“White people”), it is necessary to understand not only the YKW weaponization of Modernity and their red caping of Post Modernity in order to mislead Europeans/Whites.
But you must also understand that particularly since 2008, there has been a heavy marketing campaign orchestrated by the YKW against a characterology of “The Left.”
That is because the essential aspect of leftism – activist unionization of mass force against elite hegemony and exploitation – is a concept that could be deployed against what has become the greater elite hegemony than ever of the YKW with the 2008 subprime bail-out.
Hence, they saw the looming intersectional confrontation from a potentially organized White Ethnonationalism as having to be disrupted – and for that, White right wing reactionaries needed to be co-opted into alliance with them against “The Left.” Jews then could join the reactionaries in “the solution” to the problems that they’d had large part in creating.
This hoodwinkng leftist characterology is proposed as the enemy while Whites in reaction are further maneuvered into White identity as ever, right wing, far right, alt-right, dissident right, third position, neither right nor left but pure, corresponding with a white-knuckle grasping after warrant against this sophistry in favor of facts and objectively warranted truth, low account objectivism (or no account objectivity as opposed to relative accountability) in proposed answer to the equality that this leftist character is supposed to advocate; but this right wing identity is over and against the accountability, thus correctivity and homeostasis that would be structured by unionization of their relative group interests; instigating instead the instability and continued disorganization of White interests (just as the YKW would have it).
If rather than becoming prey to this characterology of the left as if that’s the way these concepts have to be deployed, uncorrected, and if instead of chasing after red capes, these leftist and post modern concepts where distinguished as they are supposed to correct for the maintenance of peoples in kind, as opposed to the ravages of Modernity’s universalism or the menace of traditional ethnocentrimss that won’t coordinate, and as opposed to THE international and anti-White Left, but rather a White Left Ehnonatnationalism proper, articulated as it may be, for the reasonable working hypothesis that the group concept grasps hermeneutically, despite its apparent empirical disappearance in a moment and episode; but subject in that hermeneutic unionization to palpable account, to ongoing corrective as it might thus be structured – “lefty style,” with many of its “lefty style” arguments – e.g., “social justice warriors”, but shaped and crafted to White EthnoNationalism and its interests.
However, against this realization the YKW marketing campaign amplifies their imposition of White identity as being with the right, far right and its objectivist quest for pure warrant – with a new emphasis against the sophistry of the left, a characterology of the left in their dirty praxis, concerned only with the bias of their relative and subjective interests, not the truth and facts; infamously divorced as they are from truth and facts in narratives of equality and social justice – and we could never advocate anything like social justice with Jews and right wing sell outs sitting on top the way they are, licentious liberals placated as they are, now could we? How weak, un-Apollonian, non-Nietzschan, un-Schmittian excepted, un-Faustian, un-Promethian, un-manly, un-Richard Thpentherian it would be to call their inure, whether natural or contrived to account.
Articulate though they are, mongers nevertheless, enmeshed in the discourse of their masters.
As I’ve most recently pointed-out in the example of Nick Fuentes, in his case controlled, but even in the case of controlling opposition, they often bear articulate information for our side; must, in fact, if they are to gain credibility as being on our side to gain power of assent to mislead us.
A Jewish figure hoping to enact controlling opposition goes by the name of “Frame Games.”
He went far in spilling some serious beans (at least it seems to me) in eloquence of our favor. But (((Frame-Games))) was literally playing the frame game set up by his folks to marshal White identity more affirmatively to the right and more distinctly against the characterology of the left as per the marketing campaign.
I will deal with him later because his false controlling does not need to be teased apart quite so urgently as one presenting himself as a full-fledged insider White; nor was he so directly and intimately playing opposite day with the better direction of my material as some Whites identifying as White, but controlled in opposition thus, are doing; nevertheless, the case he made is highly relevant and he did spill some serious beans.
Nevertheless, because it was pretty obvious that he was a Jew trying to run damage control and because he was tactlessly spilling significant information to White interests in his effort to get ahead of the opposition to help his people control it (even laughably proposing the stages of grief as consolation), he was compelled to take himself out of the picture – out of the (((frame game))) as it were, probably at the recall of his people; as for all his intelligence, his intentions were obvious and he was also tactless in letting out significant information to the true opposition in an effort to ingratiate himself to them in participation of this marketing campaign.
This marketing campaign was promoted heavily through the now defunct brands of Alt-Right and Alt-Lite (more directly bracketed; i.e., Jewish by way of Breitbart and Ezra Levant); but lingers much the same in the paleoconservatism of Fuentes’ America First; the more radical third positionist reactions and other expressions of the so called dissident right; and in apparent level-headed analysis in the likes of “The Z-Man.”
This is not the place to elaborate as I have before and will again on the inveterate weaponization of modernity and the red capes of post modern ideas which would otherwise recentralize and reconstruct our worldview through our people group(s); to be sustained through “leftist” concepts such as unionization and a White Left Ethnonationalism having its structure and content defined by us, in our interests; with that, warding off right wing naivete and perfidy that would make its way in by the likes of Third Positionism, or “neither right nor left” national populism and such.
With “Civil Rights” weaponization being compounded by purported compensatory correction on behalf of historically discriminated against groups, imposed against what would-be White discriminatory classification, even where necessary to survival; and with this weaponization taken to extremes, carried off to an extent that is surprising even to me, having watched this for decades knowing that it was hideous injustice against Whites, I might have a bit of sympathy for those reacting into the Jewish framework, taking their “solution” to this problem. But I don’t; they should be listening to me more carefully.
Not playing opposite day with me.
When I criticize the White use of objectivism, I criticize it when it is naively clung-to in reactionary recourse to Jewish/liberal/anti-White sophistry; to the point of epistemic blunder beyond our biological nature in praxis; beyond our human agency in reflexive interaction; and taken beyond accountability to our relative interests there – taken as “pure objectivity”, good, of itself, not for the value of its use and necessity as feedback to the calibration of our relative interests – not gauged for value as corrective feedback against the calibration of our relative group interests in praxis.
I am not suggesting that people should not engage in inquiries of science, principles, facts, objective truths that are irrespective of our relative and subjective interests; I am saying that these inquiries need to be looked upon as feedback to be gauged against our relative interests, not ends in themselves. And when I talk about liberation from mere facticity and the capacity of hermeneutics, narrative to facilitate the systemic unionization of our people that it encompasses, it is not divorced from reality, correction and the interests of our people either; on the contrary, it structures accountability as such.
But Thus Far....
But thus far, this has not sunk-in. The YKW and their right wing sellouts, along with the opportunistically licentious liberals, have been able to dissuade our spokespeople thus far to play opposite day with my platform where they might be aware of it at all.
While my corrections are on offer, I believe that the Z-Man is aware of it, playing some ill-advised opposite day with me; and I will provide some examples as to why I think I am not merely paranoid and self important in this inference.
Lets try it as a modest hypothesis: The Z-Man is endeavoring to adapt some ideas of mine and take them from the perspective of the platform that I advance (to wrest position of ourselves in systemic autonomy from Jewish exploitation and right wing/liberal complicity) and is bending them into the Jewish prescribed language game, of their marketing against a characterology of THE left.
I’m not suggesting that he is doing this for bad or corrupt motives. Nor would I be so foolish as to suggest that he is stupid. His brain power surveys an array of subject matter and at speeds that I don’t come close to managing – and he yields worthwhile information (if you don’t already know, then you might get the idea from the examples of his work that I provide).
But precisely as he can be worth listening-to, it is important to look at where he might have some important things wrong, aiding and abetting misdirection, even if unwittingly. And it is reasonable to guess that through forms of peer pressure and encouragement, wanting to be a nice guy (and/or not wanting to get clobbered by the YKW), coupled with right wing objectivist blind-spots, that he’s making these basic errors – basic, i.e., epistemic, more fundamental, a more important kind of mistake for its potential deleterious implications.
I invoke the Z-Man as he provides a good current example. Nevertheless, he is one among several of a pattern; he is not that important of himself, but rather providing one among other salient examples of those getting maneuvered into the Jewish language game counter-posed against a characterology of “The Left.”
I will provide significant details from the “Past Comparisons” podcast and other podcasts of the Z-Man later below; but to begin I want to outline the opposite day game that he is playing against the better considered platform set out here.
After this outline, I will resume and move through the article of mine that I began this post with – originally entitled, “Women Without Class” – it discusses the American “Civil Rights” movement and its pejorative impact for its destruction of group classifcatory distinctions, group boundaries thereof which would be necessarily maintained to structure accountability and protect the unfolding of qualitatively different species of people; but are ruptured, prohibited, particularly for a weaponized purity spiral of America’s Cartesian civil individual rights, which most poignantly also ruptures the classification of gender – women as they would otherwise be naturally classified as a co-evolutionary part of our group and accountable thus; rather than pandered-to as short term incentivized liberal gate-keepers, puerile antagonists, without class (without White Class) in base, universal feminine drive to incite genetic competition against us (White men).
By following from its origins in the pattern blindness of Cartesiansim to “civil individual rights” and then to the pertinent (((weaponization))) thereof, this havoc wreaking with our capacity to enact social classification (markedly of race and gender) and to discriminate in our interests accordingly, provides what I find to be a more instructive starting point in sense making of our plight as European/White peoples; while also implicitly suggesting corrective measures.
After moving through that background article/material, I will come back to illustrations from Z-Man and Frame Games… as I mentioned in the case of Nick Fuentes, controlled and controlling opposition can provide useful content in their effort to gain trust and control of their audience – but providing useful information nevertheless; not too bad if you can keep at bay the overall misdirecting framework of which they are beholden.
Because I want to focus on the relevant and useful content of Z-Man and (((Framegames))) in this post, I will only mention again some of those who are falling into this Jewish marketing campaign, in characterology of “THE Left” as the problem, “the enemy”:
As I’ve said, they are of two different kinds, coming from a more controlling position for from a more controlled position.
(((Frame Games))) would be more controlling and the Z-man would be more controlled – perhaps he could argue that everyone is controlled to some extent, but to the extent that he falls into line with their game, it’s too much.
The more controlling will generally be Jews. Besides (((Frame Games))), “advocates against PC and ‘the left” include the Weinstein Brothers, their “intellectual dark web” bullshit, Dave Rubin, “the dark enlightenment”, “neo-reactionary” bullshit of Curtis Yarvin… Stephan Molyneux, (((Steve Sailer))), Milo Yiannapoulis, David Cole Stein, John K. Press, Laura Loomer, Lauren Southern (Simonson), Black Pigeon Speaks and Mike Enoch Peinovich (who probably is part Jewish, despite declaring a DNA test otherwise); other Jews, like The Truth Will Live, are a bit more controlled, and finally, of the people I will list Paul Gottfried seems to be among the best controllers partly because it seems he is controlled by unconscious urge to do damage control for his people; thus, he is able to come across a bit more sincerely and have more influence than Frame Games, a Bobby Fischer or a Brother Nathaniel.
Luke Ford provides classic example after classic example of the marketing campaign angle that I’m talking about in controlling opposition, though he is a bit on the controlled side for his obligation as a Jewish convert to overcompensate in their interests.
Ford, a convert to orthodox Judaism, is doing this all the time, continually promoting the angle against the left and group backing and for objectivism and individual responsibility; any misdirection that he can muster against effective White organization in accordance with the plan.
Recently he ran/read a disingenuous angle by Scott Adams, who is trying to pitch a line that “we”, the populace, such as Whites and Asians, who are being discriminated against by institutions like Harvard, should argue not on the grounds of race and racial discrimination, but on the basis of class discrimination – i.e., the elites are discriminating against us on the basis of their class.
Don’t buy this line of rhetoric, because that’s all that it is. This argument by dint of the same old liberal and right wing objectivism, where civil individual rights should prevail over any classificatory distinctions, interests and necessary discrimination thereupon. This Locketine empirical fiction uncorrected by White Post Modern Hermeneutics, had falsely maintained that group classifications, including ultimately unionization of White genetic groupings, were an empirical fiction and therefore should be prohibited, giving way to individual civil rights; and where weaponized by Jewry, “Civil Rights” took vindictive measure against White freedom of and from association, and through the vindictive, supra Lockeatine concept of “anti-racism” should allow non-White and anti-White groups to impose their interests on Whites while Whites are prohibited from discrimination on the purported compensatory basis of historical discrimination.
Prominent among the controlled shabbos goy would be Jordan Peterson, of course, who recently engaged Brett Weinstein in his dark web obfuscation.
Most of the Whites, more middle of the road, wanting to be level headed advocates against PC and “the left” are coming the Frank Meyer/Ronald Reagan/Paul Gottfried/Pat Buchanan/James Burnham/Joe Sobran school come Richard Spencer, as controlled through the Alt-Right, was prompted to take things further right….
Z-Man stayed in that camp, concerned to be more populist and moderate, Jew friendly, along with Ramzpaul, Colin Liddell and Affirmative Right.
Others falling into this angle are coming from a scientistic bent, like Jared Taylor and Alternative Hypothesis, Jen Scharf and Gandalf 2.
Others are a bit less Jew friendly but misdirected if not moderated by their Christianity, like E. Michael Jones, Right Ruminations, Ecce Lux, Melchyzedek, Tyler Hamilton, Roosh V. and the array of “Trad Thots” …Praise of Folly (Todd Lewis) is always trying to shoe-horn Christianity into the equation and tends to be Jew friendly while his anarchist cohort, Keith Preston, almost seems as if he has been explicitly commissioned to counter my proposition of White Left Ethnonationalism over the years.
Of a more radical bent, proposing third positionism is Keith Woods, who is more sincere, but young and misguided in this idiocy, Josh Neal and Jefferson Lee similarly; while Joel Davis is a more disingenuous shabbos goy, all too willing to sell out in complicity to Jewish interests.
Most of them are orchestrated while others are more like Gottfried, even if not entirely conscious, are more orchestrating; Enoch Peinovich and his TRS crew are apparently more orchestrating.
Others come from more radical neo-Nazi directions to begin with, or wound up there through the influence of William Pierce, David Duke, Stormfront and the like, falling in line against, “The Left.”
Brits Mark Collett, Morgoth and Nativist Concern of Absolute State of Britain, are quite intelligent (while “Yuro” seems particularly suspect) but not quite educated as to the machinations and have thus fallen under orchestration by way of that sway – falling in by the idiotic argument that “they’re going to call you a Nazi anyway” and “it all boils down to guilt trips about the holocaust, therefore we’ve got to deny it.”
Anglin and (((Weev))) seem to have taken themselves out of the picture with their push of the Overton window out of bounds.
Others orchestrated are third positionist reactionaries, again, like Keith Wood, scientistic fuck heads like Edward Dutton and J.F. Gariepy, and the vainglorious trophy of controlled opposition, Richard Thpenther.
Coming back to the more moderate, Nick Fuentes, Red Elephant’s Vincent James and anybody under the paleocon trajectory of Gottfried and their Frank Meyers “fusionist” bit.
The late Sam Francis and his Burhham thing is another Paleocon offshoot – misdirection of Whites to the right and distracting from the J.Q. and right wing complicity…
…and again, there is also the Weinstein brothers and their bullshit “intellectual dark web” … recently, Brett conducted a talk with Sabbos Jordan Peterson, who quite famously falls in line with the marketing campaign.
But there are many, Jordan Peterson and the Weinstein brothers, their dipshit “dark enlightenment” “intellectual dark web” are full of it, but not the half of it; and pretty well known to people who care about Whites as not representing our interests…
I won’t talk too much about Greggy (Johnson) this time, but he does skirt the Z-Man and I suspect that it may even have been at Greg’s prompting that the Z-Man uses my work as a point of departure. Greg has done it before with Robert Stark (suddenly the hippie “being”, dasein as I suggest, became more Hitleresque by way of Greg and Robert – Robert Stark being another one in line with the project against, “the left”); and Greg probably suggested to Andy Nowiki (a central man to controlled opposition) that he take my concept of revising Maslow as a point of departure for one of his books.
Just as he twisted some of my ideas with Robert Stark, may have suggested to Andy Nowicky to try revising Malsow’s heirarchy, took off with my idea about immigration and agency, so too fudgy may have suggested to The Z-Man to twist some of my ideas to his right wing perspective.
The first clue that I got that the Z-man might be playing off of my ideas, ripping me off, even, was when he talked about (to paraphrase me) social group classificatory delimitation as being necessary for socialization…
That’s an idea of mine that I have been putting across with the necessity of unionization for its structuring of accountability, correctability and thus, systemic homeostasis – which Asshole (Guessedworker) has been trying to bury.
Greg Johnson remains particularly susceptible to infiltration by controlled opposition for his elitist snobbery – as such, he is over emphasizing discrimination vertically, in terms of sheer ability as opposed to horizontally, qualitatively in terms of race, he is vulnerable to let in and defend types such as glow-in-the dark octaroon Mark Dyal (Greg Banned me from Counter-Currents for observing that Dyal was not White, said White people are disgusting, is probably an alphabet agent of some sort); Vox Day, Mike Enoch Peinovich… and it isn’t just glow in the dark types who make their way through Greg’s elite snobbery, but also professional types who aren’t so much motivated by defending Whites as they are writers who have found a market among White Nationalists. Recently Greg was talking to his new hire, boomer-writer-found-audience, Jim Goad, who advised an agreeable fudge Johnson that David Cole Stein (exemplary Jewish misdirection against the Left, par excellence, with White divide and conquer mixed in) would be a good addition to his team. Greg would think so.
Having called attention to all of these people, every one of them going along with the Jewish marketing campaign against a characterology of “the left”, it is probably the sincere but controlled opposition, striking a more moderate, paleocon pose, that we have to look at as most capable of mass misdirection if they are intelligent enough. Z-Man strikes me thus, equipped as “reasonable” by way of Gottfried and Burnham. (((Frame Games))) is capable as coming across as reasonable for his combination of obsequiousness comport of effective intelligence in an effort to engage Whites in this language game of controlled opposition against “the left.”
Therefore, in this post I need to talk about Z-Man and (((Frame Games))) as they are quite relevant of themselves; they are also relevant in the way the stories they cover relate to what I’ve been talking about and how they are following from there. So let me go on to details of the Z-Man and (((Frame Games))).
A synopsis and an outline of the Z-Man’s co-option and re-direction of the platform that I propose, taking it into the (((marketing campaign))).
It may be a bit of a stretch to suggest that Z-Man is doing hermeneutics contra myself, in his “Past Comparisons” podcast, for example; but when I saw the the date of this podcast, a few days after I had posted “Trout Mask Replica”, and I hear him going into a whole thing about how the “elite class” is into being “weird” (29 Jan, 29:31), then I begin to consider that he might be taking my efforts as point of departure; his whole discussion of class in counterpoint to objectivism – I doubt that “objectivism” was a normal part of his vocabulary, though it is central vocabulary to me. He hypothesizes that this “elite class” has become divorced from interaction with the normal people and that is why they have gotten so weird. That also indicates a looking on to the kind of thing that I would discuss in my communications perspective; viz., in criticism of the “transmissions model of communication” where there is Moses in front of the class transmitting information lineally to a passive audience as opposed to the communications perspective with is interactive, negotiative joint construction of knowledge. Finally, my hypothesis of retooling Maslow for a circulating corrective, where not only the top of the hierarchy is valued, but integration with normal levels of relationship and basic levels of function is necessary corrective to the modernist paradigm, is also evident in Z-man’s game of opposite day.
Outline of Z-Man’s controlled opposition contra my platform:
A) Group classification and systemics as the way of “lefties” and Burnham’s (facile and vaguely composed) managerial class as opposed to objectivism and whatever “pure” rhetoric Z-man can use against it, proposing that they be described as fascists (in note, I believe, in departure from my aversion to the term, “fascist”) for his ‘described’ behavior of Whites in right wing identity.
B) Observer and thinker(s) detached from interaction and audience, and their being impervious to correction as opposed to what my position holds, that it is the right wing, liberals and Jews who are impervious to correction and accountability; and as opposed to us identifying with the group position also, treating it as impervious to truth and normalized correction.
They become weird hence, in a bad sense, not in the way I look upon weird as an aspect of organic being, the hairy, thing-that-crawled-out-from-under-a-rock quality, that characterizes the basic organic meandering of the most basic level of being, that can be too quickly corrected by tradition, particularly the mere tradition of military requirement of White males; while this basic organic being, which manifests a bit of weird compared to normal levels, needs to be asserted as a necessary instantiation of our intrinsic value – a most essential aspect of White identity, our right to being, to exist; it would be the strawman of assholes to take the observation of weirdness at this level and ignore that I’m saying that this organic process has to then be integrated into socialization, normal levels of function there a well as providing basis for higher actualization.
C) labeling our enemies leftists, of a leftist characterology and suggesting a new label, fascist (12 Feb, 28:32), as opposed to labeling them Jews (of a biological pattern from the ground up and from top down elite niches) weaponizing modernity, red caping post modernity and who, where promotion of Marxist internationalism falls short, promote the anti-White Cultural Marxism and enacting a marketing campaign to flatter, bribe and cohort White right wing and liberal objectivists against a characterology of “the left.”
It reminds me of the one time – ONE TIME! – in my life that I used the word ‘fascism” pejoratively in discussion. In fact, it was probably the only time that I used the term, because I avoided the term having been repulsed by it as an American, where the only time you hear it is from ignorant liberals; so I can’t bear to use it in any sense. – DanielS, 28 January 2021
Again, the Z-Man has more RPM’s to his brain cycling capacity than I, and moves through concrete issues like a can’t believe, does brilliantly up to a point but still within the kosher box, their circumscribed discourse parameters, masters of discourse that they are.
As such, he is still going along with their marketing campaign of trying to draw a characterology of “the left”, a pathological characterization… and counterpose us right wingers. Bad enough.
But he is apparently trying to bend my (better) meta analysis of this and bend it toward this Jewish prescribed language game.
I would not be surprised if he was tipped off by fudgster Greg Johnson or some other right winger to try to bend my ideas to this right wing foolery.
There are echoes there of his noticing the dark side of self actualization…
..of the need to integrate and circulate to more normal levels
…and there is the probably unwitting obfuscating misdirect of class with Burnham’s vaguely composed managerial class as opposed to my class correction – the class being the genus and the species of Whites in opposition to rogue liberal/right wing elites who see themselves objective and beyond accountability and of course the one truly elite, concretely organized class that orchestrates those right wingers and liberals, i.e., the Jews.
Maybe I’m paranoid, give myself too much credit, but would Z man use the word “objectivist” if he were not in the process of co-opting and redirecting my stuff? …and would he make a big thing about how bad the weirdness of ruling class is three days after my Trout Mask Replica post at dnanations.com, if he were not trying to counter me? as if he should do that in White interests?
I wonder if this blindness that he talks about is an attempt to turn the concept of rational blindness around on me, like asshole over there at Majorityrighs tried to do.
Aversion to the word “fascism”, concern for the divorce from interaction and joint construction of knowledge, particularly the way that corrective normalization is thwarted in the buffering of information bubbles (which I talk about as internet bubbles), are also big clues that he is trying to re-direct my efforts. Not good, because I have carefully considered these ideas for our interests.
The big thing is that he’s playing their game of making a characterology of the left into the enemy.
And not appreciating the correct White Post Modern paradigm – social group union, calibration, objectivism as feedback, measured and corrected in accountability against this group praxis, so that it is not rationally blinded but in corrective of the working hypothesis of the group; this prevents us from going into crazy land, keeps us from becoming even less tethered despite the necessary liberation from mere facticity; necessary in order to master the concept of the system, coherence accountably, agency and warrant.
I.e, the post 2008 Jews may want, more than ever, for you to join with them in rightist objectivism, contributing argument for their “merit” of elite niche hegemony, where the Marxist internationalist Left works against Zionism and the Cultural Marixist, anti White Left throws light on them as integral to whatever elite exploitation that the left perspective might complain about. They want you to believe that THE Left, that the left must be that way – internationalist, anti-nationalist and/or anti-White, but it isn’t true; and it isn’t the right framework for us to adopt – not at all.
Sorry Z Man, despite the pats on the head from the rightwing/liberal Boomers, Jews and young fogies of the Burhman school of misdirection that you have.
Taking back the Z-Man's co-option and misdirection and re-directing it, properly in White interests.
The Z-Man’s hermeneutic begins with the usual right wing starting point, i.e., the problem begins with the French Revolution…and from there moves through “the 68ers”, Marcuse’s European ‘hippies” who are removed from the Being-Against-Death that American hippies were up against by the Vietnam Draft, hence evincing their profound motive, the profound motive still for White people, the right of the male of White species in particular, to be, to live and requisitely as such, to live amidst his people – organically, in in praxis as opposed to Cartesian estrangement.
I do believe that the French Revolution is highly relevant, of course. Look for my discussion of it in the article about the red caping of Post Modernity.
But I have found rather, that starting with the Cartesianism of Descartes and Locke is the better starting point, as following that through helps to make more sense of what’s going on and what we need as corrective.
I must therefore go into this background [already begun above] before coming back to the illustrations of the Z man and how Frame Games were playing this Jewish inspired angle against a characterology of “the left.”
Without recapitulating or retracing what I’ve said about Locke in a few places here and retracing how his delegitimization of social classification was written into the U.S. Constitution and then weaponized by YKW, lets move forward. Search Locke, if you need to refresh on the start of his story at the top of the page.
Christopher Caldwell has a good idea that The Civil Rights Act inaugurated what is effectively a second Constitution. He doesn’t go as far as I do in calling it what it is, a weaponization by Jewry as such, making Whites live up to their own rules – in fact, veers into the usual Jewish encouraged right wing dodge of pandering to Trad-Women, blaming the 60’s “counter-culture” as the impetus for this “second constitution”, thus providing a way to blame hippies (White men), ignore their true motive and obfuscate the Jewish and liberal role – but in terms of observing it as a paradigm shift, yes, a good thesis.
In detail this Act is more Byzantine than that, and the ramifications of these prohibitions of discrimination are horrendous.
Even freedom of association, as it does not account for full processual development of those within the class, would not be sufficiently deep by itself, were it allowed. But while that objectivist, rational blindness leveraged by the technology of “civil rights” was bad enough, YKW interests perverted its meaning to violate even freedom of association by means of the Civil Rights Act.
Deputy Attorney General Nicholas Katzenbach, working alongside a Kennedy clan willing to sell out and open its country to catastrophic integration in order to gain power, along with a similarly disposed Lyndon Johnson, making a good bid for worst president ever, sundry other YKW and objectivist Whites, oversaw departmental operations (implementing the 1954 Brown vs Board of Education decision) in desegregating the University of Mississippi in September 1962 and the University of Alabama in June 1963 – where he personally moved Governor Wallace aside to open the door for Blacks; also worked with Congress to ensure the passage of the Voting Rights Act, and had significant help from Javitz and Celler (of 1965 Immigration & Naturalization Act infamy), to pass the 1964 Civil Rights Act.
Discrimination! Is Prohibited by Order
Title VII, Civil Rights Act (1964)
These initiatives also established precedent for California’s Rumford Fair Housing Act of ‘63 which prohibited discrimination regarding whom one rents or sells property; and the ‘68 Fair Housing Act which extended that ruling to a national basis.
We have here a culmination the ultimate in doublespeak terms: “civil rights” equals being told whose babies we must pay for, with whom we must study, whose children we must educate (with precious knowledge tortuously acquired), to whom we must rent, to whom we must sell, whom we must hire, whom we must serve even in private businesses – and this is called “freedom.”
Women Without Class
The related decision regarding the Woolworth’s Lunch Counter, telling a private business whom they must serve, was always one that caused my mind to glitch, even at a rather young age. M.L. King, with help from YKW overlords organized Blacks and others, including a few no-class White women – such as Joan Trumpauer Mulholland – to “sit-in” at Woolworth’s and force a legal decision regarding desegregation of its lunch counters. The decision never made sense to me from the moment I heard about it – not in terms of anything that you can call freedom, anyway. Telling a private business whom they must serve, how, and whom they must hire – that is called “freedom”? It must be a YKW definition. “Freedom marches, freedom riders, civil rights” – right? Wrong. Rather quite civil wrongs.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 went further by banning racial segregation “by businesses offering food, lodging, gasoline, or entertainment to the public.
It is a civil right and its opposite is called illegal discrimination punishable by law. Do not discriminate; do not see the terror that you are confronted with; do not see that you are in something like a monkey cage, a planet of the apes (I can tell whether one has or has not been around many, depending upon an indignant response to that analogy or not).
This would seem to be a clear violation of civic freedom, but YKW are skilled at promoting the self-destruction of Whites, who have been high on obsequious objectivism, while Blacks are hyper-assertive.
M.L. King Jr. and Malcolm X were at the U.S. Capitol on March 26, 1964. Both men had come to hear the Senate debate on the bill. This was the only time the two men ever met.
In the article on Kant’s moral system, I mentioned a kind of anguish bordering on torture that I experienced when I was groping after a moral order: That anguish stemmed from having inherited an obsequious Christian rule structure – the golden rule – by which I was to somehow go up against America’s rule structure, lording as it did competition as noble for all and yet presenting me with still another obsequious and imperative rule in the form of the 64 Civil Rights Act; in confrontation with antagonistic demographics. Having experienced more than enough of them through forced busing to go to school with them, their riots of 1967 and 68 in the town of my birth, I was largely convinced that I did not want anything to do with Blacks. I assumed in my young age that it would be my prerogative one day, and that sane people would make the same choice. How could I believe that others, women especially, could do other than legitimate separatism after seeing such things?
With Blacks rioting in Newark in the summer of 1967, my father’s generation repeating the “greatest generation” mantra that ‘you can’t fight City Hall’, the Vietnam War escalating unintelligibly so that no young person with a penis was immune from the draft, yes, I did have a certain yearning for the San Francisco version of that same summer of ‘67.
Beatle’s guitarist George Harrison did go there – to the Summer of Love Be-In festival in San Francisco’s Golden Gate Park – but came away with a bad impression having dropped a bad batch of L.S.D. He saw these kids around him hideously spotted and vacuum-cleaner faced. From our perspective now, naturally it does not seem like such a bad scene, certainly the better option in the tale of two cities, Newark and San Francisco 1967. No wonder I was reluctant to let that go, particularly enchanting it was to me as a child. I was disappointed when traditional women and men would say that was “all nonsense” or “the source of our problems”; and disconcerted to experience similar antagonism from feminists, particularly when the war had ended.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 goes further to say that, “An employer cannot discriminate against a person because of his interracial association with another, such as by an interracial marriage.”
Just Great! (for non native English speakers, note the sarcasm please): You cannot discriminate against people that you do not like, whom you find immoral and dangerous.
While the dam had not burst through the 60s, 70s, or even into the early 80s, it was a period of ominous buildup, the implications of the rule structure and demographic make-up were pervasive and auguring catastrophe…
Once the Vietnam War had ended, traditional women were rearing their ugly head and feminism went into high gear, steam-rolling any agenda for White male needs, though many boys still had need for being, communal being (midtdasein). I had just assumed that everyone would naturally reject forced integration and charges of “racism” but young women did not seem quite as inclined. Why?
Let’s qualify all statements made about young women below to mean, at their worst/most opportune, given defective social structure and pandering. Even without the social classificatory unionization that would structure their proper socialization into account of their historical social capital, it would be clearly wrong to say that there are not plenty of cool White women. (1)
Thesis: Within the disorder resulting from civil individual rights (a feature of Enlightenment/ Modernity) rupturing group classificatory (racial genus and species) bounds, the natural one-up position of young females (“you’re so wonderful, may I have a date?”; i.e., an expression of sperm being cheap, ovaries precious) emerges with increased significance as they are less accountable to their inheritance, more competed for, pandered-to even, from males of other groups.
a) Solicited from many directions, they typically become confirmed, articulate, confident, more coherent by way of female identity and authoritative – let’s say sometimes beyond merit.
b) They have increased incentive to maintain the power of this position, a powerful gatekeeping role – to maintain a situation as disordered as possible, letting the most liberal men into positions of power, while playing men off of one another increases their price and their gain (in the short term, anyway); thus they are encouraged, particularly as puerile and unsocialized to responsibility to their own social capital, to keep men competing against each other as much as possible. Human socialization is over-ridden with that, and their most base natural tendency to incite genetic competition (E.O. Wilson) increases to runaway effect.
c) Jewish pandering to women as part of their Cultural Marxist program (largely blacks, women and gays against White men) in conjunction with objectivist interests – the kind of argument that you want to make when you/your people are doing well and you don’t want the system, you and your people’s part in it, called into question: this would include not only (((weaponized))) objectivist arguments against equality, but is also done by the (((weaponization))) of anti-racism – clash and combine in the disordering effect, with atavistic effect in the de facto need to classify (Women, Fire and Other dangerous Things), strengthening high contrast tropism toward those classifications – females and Blacks – too difficult to ignore.
. . . . . . . . . .
For a White man to challenge this is to impugn his own masculinity straight away, along with his Americanness in that connection – denying his brave individual participation in the unprejudiced land of opportunity. Hence, a Charmed Loop is maintained, which keeps these late Modern circmstances disordered.
And within the disorder resulting from modernity and civil rights rupturing of classificatory (racial) bounds, the natural one-up position of young females (you are so wonderful, may I have a date? sperm is cheap) emerges with increased significance. Thus, puerile female bias and selective preferences (confidence, pragmatic directness and assertion) will be over-valued and not sufficiently corrected by the many ameliorative aspects of the male selective predilections (cooperation, intellectual circumspection and empathy).
This disorder will disfavor the K selection strategy of Whites, evolved for planning and skills revealed in value over long patterns, against the Augustinian (natural) devils of the elements and seasonal deprivation; while modernity’s upshot of atavistic disorder and the one up puerile female, by contrast, will fall to R selectors, those evolved for brute tribal and episodic competition and display of palpable assertion on a base level; on the other hand it can also favor those tribalists, not necessarily R selective, but of a high i.q. type more skilled in Manichean (trickster, rule changing) devils of interpersonal, inter-group competition – those more cunning in the enactment of their group discrimination – YKW.
This will exacerbate an atavistic, Africanizing effect on the mass circumstance as sublimated concern for protracted pattern and preparation gives way in the disorder of modernity to an apparent value of more directly competitive, episodic assertion and selection – atavistic, thus closer to our primitive circumstance and evolution – a circumstance and selective bias liable to have created in Africans the hyper-masculine people that they are by comparison to other races (along with the social destruction of hyper masculinity); yet characteristics favorable once again where the disorder of modernity has ruptured accountability to protracted patterns to the point of atavistic circumstance, where episodic criteria emerge more important again – at least in the eyes of the puerile female gate keeper.
a) Solicited from many directions.
Absent class bounds the one-up position of young White females re-emerges with increased significance. Occupying a more “addressive” position, they are solicited from many directions, becoming relatively confirmed, oriented, articulate, confident, and authoritative. A young man would make a mistake by trying to clarify the rules through meta-communication (orientative talk about how talk counts) as that is stepping on her toes as gate-keeper. And she can easily take many a brutal recourse should her position be disrespected, weaker sex and all of that. He can barely do anything right if that’s how she wants to see it (he can always be discharged as a wimp or a pig). She can do many things, arbitrarily, and get away with it. This is why one ought to exercise some caution when denouncing anti-racism. She sees this as a motion to limit her recourse and power. Whereas one perhaps used to seek out a priest, a scientist or a philosopher, now because of her increased one up position, one might be tempted to seek out a young woman to talk to directly in order to appeal to her in hopes of salvaging a human ecology and a human world.
b) Gate keeper position and genetic incitement multiplies
Whether civil rights of the objectivist kind, or the perverted Jewish kind of the 1964 Act, with their (((anti-racism))) further compounding its rupturing of class bounds, developmental processes and accountability thereof, the natural tendency of young females to incite genetic competition (E.O. Wilson) increases to runaway effect. Particularly absent class bounds, young females have increased incentive to maintain the power of their position as gatekeepers, irrespective of race, to the detriment of the White Class.
Moreover, they will empower men who prevent discrimination and maintain the disorder in order to maintain the position as gate-keepers to the extent they have it; they will even empower men otherwise disposed to racial consciousness inasmuch as they pooh-pooh the issue of race and the merit of White advocates.
Since miscegenation is among their greatest weapons, the same old yin-yang is going to go into effect as they empower “objective men” to clear away White men of racial/class consciousness.
The yin-yang has been in effect as long as I can remember, with the Democrats representing integrationist, mulatto supremacism, Republicans representing the dolts that women and Jews can control as if trying to say, “We’re so tough; racial consciousness is all nonsense”.
Therefore, sometime within the initial interaction episode, a young man is likely to get a litmus test as she asks what he thinks of Blacks and of racism. If he is honest enough to say that he does not like them, sees good reason for racial discrimination, he is likely to be ostracized. In fact, since miscegenation is one of the biggest threats at her disposal in maintaining the power of her gate-keeping position, she may go to extremes to stigmatize those who challenge it. Naturally, she will be particularly fearful and aggressive to maintain the anti-racist taboo once she has crossed that line. Hence, it is not only Jews and men attempting to be innocent who hazard the White Class.
I understand the paranoia of those who do not want to take their eye off the power, who think that they are trying to divide and conquer by lowly racial conflict; but if the formalities of incommensurate logics of meaning and action, of qualitative, paradigmatic difference are swept aside in favor of the false comparisons of “non-equalitarianism” and no critique is made of disingenuous female positions, the same old cycle is going repeat largely to our detriment.
Okay, men have been inarticulate to their mandate for being – me too, somewhat. Having asserted early on in the gender agendas article that male being was warranted through co-evolution, I later fumbled a bit, speculating that perhaps women would not allow for it – doesn’t matter: White Male Being is warranted through survival and our co-evolution with our women for 40,000 years. Innocent until proven guilty, we co-create these women and children, blacks do not.
But even though women and objectivist men are rupturing classification, Jews are not merely pandering objectively to natural inclination, they are instrumental in preventing corrective action.
[Note: I cultivated the concept of Jewish “red caping” after the first versions of this article; the reader is advised to consult my post on the issue; it would flesh out matters after this point; while this post is primarily addressing their weaponization of modernity; and it is a red caping along with other historical precedents, the red caping strategy is consummate through post modernity].
c) Jewish pandering and objectivist interests combine with de facto need to classify (classification in human sized categories, a need in order to make sense of one’s circumstances).
Pandering to the addressive position of females, while not exclusive to Jews, is of especial significance coming from them. Powerfully organized as a class, historically threatened by Whites, Jews pander to this most crucial interface – and what could be more painful than to have people that you are born to love and protect being against you, criticizing you endlessly, hating you, treating you has privileged even if having succeeded against massive opposition, including by them – in order to weaken and demoralize the White class.
Thus they play upon the objectivist upshot of disorder. Like women, Blacks represent a difference, a tropism too different to ignore within disorder despite prohibition of classifications; yielding a classification that grants them strength in solidarity, easy identity and coherence.
This is farther bolstered by endless Jewish stories pandering to women as victims, reversing the taboo, where are now heroes for miscegenating with Blacks and advocating Blacks in their supposed victim status.
That combines with the fact that Blacks are often emboldened by having less to lose (for one thing, who wants their women?).
And combines with the fact that Blacks are the opposite of being disadvantaged in crucial respects – they’ve been in The US as long as any Whites and they know the ropes; and are well positioned to gain the system, to take advantage of the advantage of Jewish advocacy of them, using them as muscle against White power: economics, political, legal, media/entertainment….
Easy, well paying government jobs (e.g., post office) with good benefits that they over represent are an example that is less talked about compared to other affirmative action and welfare.
They are well positioned and long standing victimizers, exploiters of Whites and likely to have biological hegemonies – particularly in the atavistic circumstance of modernity where short term, episodic abilities appear valuable – they will compete effectively having evolved some 200,000 years prior to the relatively precarious 40,000 years of European differentiation.
Not only that, but having evolved in a primordial disorder, their kind of selection has quantified and maxed-out masculinity –
creating an aggressive, presumptuous, hyper-assertive kind of people with lower time horizon and impulse control –
while puerile white females within the disorder, pandered to (especially by YKW), will be inclined to them; and all the more, especially as the orienting organization of classifications are both prohibited (inciting them to violate taboo in order to try to locate agency) and humanly necessary, the high contrast tropism of Black White as hard to ignore as Male/Female, is thus farther exacerbated; females being pandered to in torrents (by Jews most pertinently) on that interface will keep the class disordered and its morale down.
Therefore, despite obvious, broad destruction to the class, ecology and accountability, and despite would-be corrective action – as most White men naturally and with good reason hate miscegenating White women – the pairing with this aggressive, presumptuous, hyper-assertive people will increase given the present rule structure. White men are prevented from doing anything about it largely due to the agency of Jewish machinations in interface with young females and objectivists within the disordered situation, absent racial classificatory bounds.
While Jews aren’t solely responsible for promoting miscegenation, they’re largely responsible; even more significantly, responsible for preventing White men from doing anything about it.
Civil Rights Act of 1964: “An employer cannot discriminate against a person because of his interracial association with another, such as by an interracial marriage.”
Civil rights rupture developmental processes and the ecological pattern disbursement that would otherwise be managed and maintained by the class. With equality/non-equality being made central, as opposed to classification and maintenance of paradigmatic differences that make a formal difference, incommensurate logics of meaning and action are improperly meshed to the detriment of marginal Whites, and liable to create the narcissism of false comparison, unnecessary competition, reciprocally escalating diatribe and pervasive ecological destruction.
To repeat: if people keep going around making equality a straw man and non-equality the thing as opposed to paradigmatic difference(s) and race (class) being the matter, this will create false comparisons and unnecessary, counter productive conflict; i.e., not that we should seek to avoid conflict necessarily, but as we do want the chips to fall on our side; we need for the conflict to be less arbitrary. (2)
For bringing to bear Black violence and destruction to the culmination of our 40,000 years of evolution, miscegenators and their instigators are no better, rather they are highly analogous to rapists and pedophiles; they might be considered accordingly. A scientistic view would say miscegenation is a naturally occurring fact. Rape and child molestation may be natural inclinations as well, but we do not accept them; rather we seek social injunction. In this example, the agency of a social constructionist view is superior to the mere causality of a scientistic view.
White men are warranted to Be as the White Class is warranted to Be by dint of our survival and co-evolution over the course of 40,000 years. Innocent until proven guilty, we make White women and children. And males have an underrated selective bias, preferring cooperative, empathic and thoughtful partners (3). Even the asymmetry of White female beauty that White men have co-created is a sign of genetic advance and harmonious niche adaptation to environment.
Normal White men don’t create unnecessary wars, aren’t the ones exploiting others with fortune 500 companies, are not the ones over populating the world. Nevertheless, White men who are in developmental stages, on basic motivational levels seeking being, are going to be out of luck absent the class bounds. Our White class is seeking Being as well. It is struggling to assert the warrant to exist. It is the righteous fight, but fight smart we must, and look toward the power.
Absent class bounds and subject to the throes of Jewish machination, the large majority of White men are going to get screwed by those after “actualization” – like Malcolm X quoting Elijah Muhammad that the Black Man will rule – we instinctively answer “no thanks.”
The Black Power movement was after actualization of power – a better fit to the U.S. narrative and both feminist and traditional female motive to actualization than the incommensurate White male motive for Being – very difficult to articulate, it requires space and boundaries.
At the same time, Black Civil Rights activists as trained in the Marxist highlander school, were being instructed to adopt dress (thin black ties, horn rimmed glasses)and demeaner (“peaceful resistance” provoking police violence and public outcry for law change in favor of blacks) to occupy the intermediate levels of the social hierarchy – i.e., to affect “dignity”, the dignity of co-gate-keepers of the power.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a rupturing of the White Class. After a laugh, cry or puke, settle down to see that it is evil.
Conclusion – Absent class bounds, the female one-up position emerges with increased significance, often beyond merit and sufficient testing to instill appreciation of requisite conservatism (they can always find another thug/white knight to come to their short term rescue). This exacerbated pandering and incitement to genetic competition. We need White women with White class by contrast. Civil rights ruptured developmental processes within otherwise self-corrective patterns – especially as (((weaponized))) and red caped by YKW. Correction and advance requires the legitimacy of classification – The White Class.
(1) I love women, they are veritably my religion – 14 Words – especially in a racially homogeneous situation – though not as much in mixed one: With things being so foul, and their being so incredulous as to how I could be flustered over a rule structure and demographically mixed situation that was clearly auguring catastrophe, I’ve had to think about it. While there are ways in which females can legitimately share power, many of them, young in particular, do not merit the sort of power that they wield within the disordered context of modernity.
I am not promoting only traditional roles for women. Don’t you want more Virginia Abernethys? I do. It only requires the Class and that they undergo a bit more rigor on basic levels. Conversely, a bit more Being for men in exchange for maintaining the class – and it is warranted. White men’s existence is warranted as is The White Class.
(2) In fact, encouraging the natural animosity that Black women have toward White women taking Black men is a good angle, not only in discouraging such pairings, but also in agitating to bring the Jewish / objectivist system down which is so uncaring, having broached our most sacred and important human concern, our close personal relationships as they bear upon our survival. The beaming smiles of approval that I have received from Black women in those times when I antagonized interracial couples is an irony that stays with me. The “sisters” (Black women) obviously will not care too much about the White women who take their men. On the other hand, White men do not want Black women; we sense that it is going horribly backwards: their ugly symmetry a sign of primitive undifferentiation, imperviousness to environment and social concerns, disposition to thoughtless overgrazing.
Another strategy I find relatively effective is to agree with interracial couples that Black women are indeed, ugly. It tends to confuse them as the insulted party is not there; after all, what is he doing with a White woman if Black women are so great? (obviously, exercise discretion – you may not want to say “ugly”, you might best say nothing in some cases). If they will, let these enraged Black women be allies in taking down the Jewish/objectivist system – which has broached our most sacred, our close personal relationships – its total disregard for that which is most important to us, our co-evolutionary women. Nevertheless, when listening to David Duke interview Patricia McAllister, what struck me was her claim that Blacks ought to have half of America. Do you see what I mean by hyper-assertive? For all the money and treasures they have taken from us, the destruction wrought upon us, they should have half of America?… hmm.
Mulatto Supremacism is another legitimate contention which liberals and YKW can find difficult.
(3) As opposed to the female/Nietszchean perspective which values men big and strength exclusively, impervious and undaunted no matter what, Negroes with good digestive tracts. That may explain why the N word is prohibited by the female gate keeper’s union – the N word is not ok, but Himmler was well reasoned in wanting to genocide Poles – after all, the women are beautiful; we cannot have that when Black women have the humility to be so non-threatening – so often butt ugly.
***
Despite my efforts thus far, the Jewish marketing campaign against a characterology of “the left” remains in effect, deploying its useful idiots like J.F. Gariepy as best it can (Cotto and Gottfried like you J.F., coincidence?). Hold-up in the isolated tundra of Northern Canada, J.F. has escaped the fall out of America’s liberal/right wing civil individual rights, objectivism weaponized by Jewry; and he is stupid enough to go along with their marketing campaign that it is a characterology of “the left” that has done this; not that it was an international/anti national Marxist left and an anti-White Cultural Marxist Left, nor in tandem with White liberals and right wing sell outs; no suggestion of the possibility of a White ethnonational left nor the fact that it can both look after its relative interests (as group calibration/ working hypothesis) and deal with objective reality (as feedback, dealing in brute facts, part of homeostatic correctivity in the union and basis of praxis as opposed to the natural fallacy of mere facticity).
How the Z-Man might twist and take this story (if I let him).
You get this slobbering praise of blacks for these tiny little accomplishments by black people. …If you remove white people from the equation entirely all then these activities disappear.. ..Even these trivial accomplishments of blacks are not possible without the work of White peopleFrankly, it’s ridiculous, this slobbering praise of blacks is not helping the cause, every time anyone sees this a White Nationalist is born (31:50).
Fascism… you know, Paul Gottfried wrote a book called “Fascism, the Career of a Concept” .. I recommend this book all the time.The term capitalism was actually invented by the Marxists….the word fascism really does have magical powers …in the hands of the left of course its a weapon to smote their enemies real and imagined, but it’s something that they fear, they really have a visceral fear of this thing …and of course they always tend to fear the things that they’re doing or that they are, you know they always accusing their enemies of whatever they’re up to and that’s an important thing to keep in mind as we move forward here; now of course (28:53) the right, they never pick up this thing, they’re so afraid of the topic entirely because they’ve been branded with it so many times that they don’t want any association with it at all, so they’re just allergic to the use of the word “fascism.” (Deep Thoughts, 12 Feb 2021 – 22:00).
I certainly remember the idea of liberals hating corporations and hating big business. And yet here they are uniting.
“The common factor (in the variants of fascism) was bringing together business labor and government into a corporate body of the people.”
(Until recently) the idea of liberal groups enlisting the titans of industry was unthinkable.
Everyone is focused on how weird this is…
“leftists’, liberals uniting with corporations like fascism.”
..”the people who have been endlessly railing about how trump is a fascist and an authoritarian are now bragging about staging what amounts to a fascist coup.”
“The reaction to the protests on January 6th kind of aligns with the Reichstag fire used by the Nazis to suspend civil liberties, to eliminate political opposition, force other people to support their seizure of government, to crack down on dissidents, Trump supporters especially, forcing Republicans to make allocutions about their role in the election”…“Biden has already singed 52 executive orders, more than any other president and he’s only been in office a few weeks …the imperial president that the left is always warning about.”
“The Left’ is using this to crack down further on free speech civil liberties.”
Everyone is focused on how weird this is…
..but the common factor in fascism was bringing together business labor and government into a corporate body of the people.
..the people who have been endlessly railing about how trump is a fascist and an authoritarian are now bragging about staging what amounts to a fascist coup.
When you get past the misdirection of “voter fraud” and concentrate on Zuckerberg’s corporate sponsorship of inner city voter registration, Z-man renders a valid depiction.
“It is kind of like the trillion dollar bill that is laying on the sidewalk.”… “calling these people fascists is something that everyone on our side is afraid to do, but its a pretty effective weapon, the word fascist is their kryptonite, its the thing that scares them because they know in their heart that’s who they are, and we’re seeing it, we’re seeing them play it out, the thing that they’re always accusing others of is the thing that they know down deep is the thing that they’d do if given the opportunity and they’ve had the opportunity….it’s time for us to take the opportunity to call them that, start using this weapon, start calling them what they are, they’re fascists.”.
.”One of the things that right wing people have always struggled with is understanding the motivations and mental processes of people on the left. Even people who have journeyed to this side of the great divide have often struggled to make sense; of what motivates a left wing person. I mean, it is quite baffling; and the reason for this though and the reason why we often struggle to understand what they’re up to and why they’re doing these things, and often get it wrong, is because right wing people often tend to be republican objectivists.“
“Lenin, the communists, Bolsheviks, they are generally considered responsible for giving us the term partisan, partisanship, ideological partisanship…and Lenin talked about this difference between the bourgeoise – they look at public policy, they look at public issues, they look at history, and they say, well, there’s an objective truth here; and that’s important, we need to find out what the truth is; and in the case of public policy say, what’s the best public policy.”“But a partisan, especially a class conscious partisan in the case of Lenin,, they don’t look at that, they look at what’s in the best interest of their class, they look at what’s in the best interest of their side; and so, you’re not worried about the truth or trying to come up with the right solution; you know, you’re worried about what works for you, how it advances your interests. That’s the difference.And in the case of America there’s this civic virtue that’s come into that objective, that objectivism and so we look at social problems and we try to come up with the best solution in the moral framework of republican virtue.”“That’s the way that the republican minded, objectivist mind works.”“Ideological partisans, on the other hand, they’re always thinking about what advances their partisan interests. They look at the homeless problem, and they ask how can we take advantage of this, how can we advance our ideology, how can we use this as a weapon … In the case of bums, they let them out of the asylums, really low security prisons….and that creates a bum problem; so instead of trying to solve the bum problem they were just using this as an ideological weapon to beat over their enemies head – back in the 80s they were constantly saying hat Reagan caused this homeless problem when in fact it was the left that did it. The bums and their problems really are of no interest to the left …they really just look at it as how can we use it as a weapon… this baffles people on the right…. (((Steve Sailer))) … who I’ve been reading for more than twenty years… has been trying to come up with rational explanations for the madness he observes on the left…he’s completely baffled by the ideologue ..Tucker Carlson will say the reason they do this is power….no, the reason they do this is because they actually hate you. It has nothing to do with rational explanation. But our side struggles with that, we can’t wrap our minds around it; many on this side of the great divide also suffer from it, even though we’re much more realistic about the human condition. We still are rational people, and we think that people are motivated by rational self interest and so its tough for us to grasp the workings of the partisan mind; it’s simply too alien.”
Well I have an example of this, something that I think is pretty good as an explanation of this:L.A. Times Colum, Virginia Hefferlan “What Can We Do About the Trumpites Next Door?”Now I looked her up and lets just say that it’s unfortunate that the world “heffer” is in her name.”
“Oh, heck no. The Trumpites next door to our pandemic getaway, who seem as devoted to the ex-president as you can get without being Q fans, just plowed our driveway without being asked and did a great job.How am I going to resist demands for unity in the face of this act of aggressive niceness?
Of course, on some level, I realize I owe them thanks — and, man, it really looks like the guy back-dragged the driveway like a pro — but how much thanks?
These neighbors are staunch partisans of blue lives, and there aren’t a lot of anything other than white lives in the neighborhood.
This is also kind of weird. Back in the city, people don’t sweep other people’s walkways for nothing.Maybe it’s like what Eddy Murphy discovered in that old Saturday Night Live sketch, White Like Me, he goes undercover in White makeup … and discovers that when White people are alone they give things to one another for free.”
Z-Man continues (48:02): Notice a couple things right away. First of all, this is a woman who, no doubt, is ranting and raving about racists all the time; and yet her get away is to live in an all White neighborhood. The lack of self awareness is a defining feature of the partisan. They can’t see themselves; this woman wants to live in an all white neighborhood and yet at the same time call everyone a racist for wanting to live in an all white neighborhood.
Notice the other thing here. She looks at this small gesture of neighborliness and immediately starts thinking about the politics of it. …the normal person ..thanks the neighbor for the kindness. That’s how normal minds work.The partisan mind assumes everyone is working some angle for their hive for their interest. So they evaluate everything that everyone does through that lens.What are these people up to? How shall I respond in order to advance my ideological interests.I mean that’s what this whole column is about; she’s trying to help her fellow hive mates figure out how to turn other people’s niceness, you know those people outside the hive, turn it to their advantage.
Ibid, L.A. Times, 5 Feb 2021, Heffernan:“Hezbollah, the Shiite Islamist political party in Lebanon also gives away stuff for free; the favors Hezbollah does..like other mafia, Hezbollah attends to its own…. and demand devotion to their brutal us versus them anti Sunni cause, some of us are family, the favor says, the rest are infidels.The same is true of Louis Farrakhan, who currently helms the Nation of Islam. While the Southern Poverty Law Center classifies him as a dangerous anti Semite much of his flock says that he is just a little screwy and unfailingly magnanimous to them. When someone helps you when you are down … it’s almost impossible to regard them as a blight on the world. In fact, you are more likely to be overwhelmed with gratitude and convinced of the person’s inherent goodness.You might end up like the upper middle class family that I stayed with in France as a teenager. They did not attend a city wide celebration for the 100th birthday of Charles DE Gaulle – the war hero who orchestrated the liberation of his country from Nazi Germany. They did have several portraits of Felipe Petain, Nazi collaborator, on their wall. When I screwed up the courage to ask how it was to them during the occupation? the lady of the house replied we were happy because the Nazis were very “polis” .. I was in tears when I found out (that meant) polite.So when I accept generosity from my pandemic neighbors, acknowledging the legitimate kindness with a wave and a plate of cookies am I also sealing us in as fellow travelers who are very polis to each other but not so much to “them.”
Z-man continues (50:56):Now lets look at this for a second. I mean, this woman is comparing her neighbors to Hezbollah, the Nation of Islam or Nazis. That’s pretty monstrous. Imagine being this bleep’s neighbor?Normal are worried about speaking ill of someone when they’re not around.Partisans are incapable of that normal human emotion because the only thing that mattes to them is the people is membership in their hive. It’s all consuming. That’s why she lumps Hezbollah, the Nation of Islam and the Nazis in the same camp as her neighbors, these Trump voters. The partisan just sees the world as good guys and bad guys, ..it gets back to this lack of self awareness…she can’t see that what she’s describing is herself. ..when she peers over the hive walls, all she sees are the undifferentiated masses that are bad guys. .. this is why she can mix and match, and don’t even think about it… all these names, right winger, Trump supporter, Hezbollah, extremist., Q Anon, Nazis, fascist, all this means is that they are outsiders – them; all that matters to her is that they are outsiders.Note the entirely contrived story about staying with a family of Nazi collaborators during high school ..this woman is 51, which means that her trip was probably in he late 80s …what are the odds of her staying with a family of senior citizens who were Nazi collaborators? I would say just about zero. But in the Partisan mind the truth is not a constraint.
Notice that the Z-man is chasing after the (((red cape))) of the hermeneutic liberation from mere facticity – a good and necessary Heideggerian idea, properly understood and deployed – which I have been advancing for years despite total resistance from Asshole (Guessedworker).
Z-man continues: This is why they’re so fond of these whoppers they post on social media. …because when all that matters is advancing your ideological interests, the truth is just another tool at your disposal. When the truth is useful use the truth, when a lie will work, use the lie.
Heffernan: So here’s my response to my ploughed driveway for now. Politely but not profusely, I’ll acknowledge the Sassian move with a wave and thanks, a minimal start at building back trust. But I’m not ready to knock on the door with a covered dish yet. I also can’t give my neighbors absolution; it’s not mine to give. Free driveway work, as nice as it is, is just not the same currency as justice and truth. To pretend it is would be a lie and they probably aren’t looking for absolution anyway. But I can offer a standing invitation to make amends. Not with a snow plough but by recognizing the truth about the Trump administration and more important, by working for justice for all those the administration harmed. Only when we work shoulder to shoulder to repair the damage of the last four years, will we even begin to dig out of this storm.
Z-man (54:01): Now this is a woman who said earlier in this post, that she’s not sure about how to go about building unity. Well what she defines as unity is everyone outside the walls, the only way they will ever be part of whatever she’s a part of is that they fully give up, they completely quit. They accept all of her ideological arguments and accept them as truth. This is the hard part for our side. These people lack normal empathy. This is not a normal person. This is a sociopath. This woman is just demented, this is not human. This woman cannot be nice to her generous neighbors until they are broken; until they accept her ideological fantasies as the truth.The detachment from reality is another aspect of the Partisan mind. Because, again, she is not concerned about facts; that’s a right wing thing. Right wing people worry about facts and making logical arguments from those facts; to derive new facts, that’s what right wing people do. because they’re objective. They look at the world and they say that these are the things that are true and these are the things that we can derive from these truths and these are the things that we’re not sure about, they’re opinions.
For the partisan, everything is opinion; Truth is just opinion because there is no truth; it’s just how you use it, it’s how you wield it.
This woman is evil… the neighbor should not have been nice to her, because this woman and all these left wing partisans, they’re evil. Decent moral people can’t understand evil. It’s impossible for us. It’s beyond our capacity. All we can do is oppose it.
The lack of self awareness here…it is amazing just how blind these people are to reality. All that matters to them is this hive mindedness, this fantasy world they live in. In isolation its no big deal but these people have real power. You know, partisans are the bane of civilized society; the only thing we can do is wall ourselves off and isolate them from decent, civilized people.
And the Z-Man’s “Past Comparisons” is perhaps most telling of his playing a game of opposite day with me – not saying its a major animating motivation of his life and work, but it is there.
The Z-Man may not be riffing on my hermeneutics by way of his “Past Comparisons” but having said that, there are coincidences further indicating a game of “opposite day”; lets move in to this.
As I mentioned above, I find Locke’s grievance against classification and the part his notion of civil individual rights over and against by contrast, especially as weaponized by Jewry, to be a more instructive starting point than the usual right wing starting point against the French Revolution and its depiction of “the left.” … I do think the French Revolution was important, of course, and I talk about it in the article on red caping. But I find that I am making more sense with my starting point than people who start there.
Well, Z-man starts this episode with that starting point, the French Revolution, and he articulates the scene and its characters very well.
I've found Locke and The American Revolution to make more sense of what is going on than The French Revolution, but anyway...
“Arguably, the most important event in western history is The French Revolution…
Z-Man argues for this starting point on the basis of its instructive familiarity – as Joe Sobran pointed out (reference to Joe Sobran providing another clue as to Z-Man’s paleoconservatism).
“The French Revolution is usually depicted as starting with the storming of the Bastille and ending with Napoleon.”
“The seeds of the French Revolution were really in the efforts to reform the finances and the economy of France.”
“The first guy who is interesting is a guy named Anne Robert Jacques Turgot.”Before him were the physiocrats, who were only looking at agricultural output – and this was a very old way of looking at things – not looking at labor, trade, innovation and invention..
The system was in trouble debt high, taxes not covering, concerns about solvency of crownHe was appointed controller general of finances in 1774.And his first Act was to submit to the king a statement of his guiding principles:No bankruptcy, no increase of taxation and no borrowing.
This was very appealing to the Crown, troubled for solvency as it was, because what it was saying in effect is that no hard decisions would have to be made.Though his austerity caused pain to the broader public, he managed class conflicts pretty well – he handled food riots and dealings with the American Revolution well; he was correct about the need for austerity, but the economy was still suffering as a result of medieval tax structure, debt and patronage.
Things were getting better but not enough.To tackle these problems he introduced the six edicts (which got him fired):One was the suppression of a form of forced labor. Landed aristocrats had been relying on free labor.He also wanted to suppress the guild system, because this was closing off competition and innovation.The people who ran the guild system profited greatly from the fact that they had this choke point for tradesman and so they got rich off of it.So guess what, those two edicts weren’t very popular.You’re basically telling two very powerful constituencies that they are going to have to give up the thing that made them wealthy and powerful.The king’s ministers agreed and the only question was how they were going to get rid of Turgot.Really what he ran into was two other things. This was a system that he was trying to reform that had very powerful constituents in that system that saw reform, any kind of reform, as an implicit threat against their position.It wasn’t just about money, it was about their position, there was a psychological component.Essentially he was trying to reform the economy to eliminate these positions and that was never going to fly.Inside the court they were still doing the same old intrigues and politics that they always did before there was a serious crisis; it was like a game for these people.What mattered to the people inside the crown was not this existential crisis that was threatening their very existence, they couldn’t think of that; they could think about petty insider politics. That was the downfall of Turgot.
After him was a guy named Jacques Necker, who became the next finance minister from 1777 to 1781. He publicized finances, something that had never been done and that practice got him fired, though publication wasn’t the problem so he gets hired then fired again (kind of like the Billy Martin of his times) … then there is the storming of the Bastille so he’s brought back again …he figures the crowd has learned finally what they have to do in terms of tax reform, but no…the crowd doesn’t agree and six months later he resigns.The thing that is fascinating about Necker though, is that he is, in a lot of ways like the reformers we see in our modern politics.Frist of all, he was not a noble, and that’s a big deal.He was never one of them and that made him an outsider. And that put him at a disadvantage; and that seemed to be something that he never fully processed.He was treated like an enemy when he was there to help.He never really grasped that being correct, having the right formula was not as important as figuring out the politics, like Turgot, he saw the problems that France faced but he couldn’t figure out how to implement those structural reforms.…he kept slamming into the politics because it really wasn’t an economic problem, it was a political problem.Having a better solution didn’t matter; he had to win the politics to win the economic problem.He always tried to use the economics to win the politics and it never works that way. It doesn’t work that way today.Still Necker remained a true believer and this is what I’m seeing with the right today; no amount of hypocrisy, no amount of double standards, changing standards, no amount failure seems to shake the faith of the reformers.The successful reformer has help from the inside while the failed reformer winds up hated by both sides….
Comparisons to the politicians of today and recent history...
A change that has gone largely unremarked is that politicians don’t act anything like they did 25-30 years ago.
They have become insulated in a world not susceptible to town hall tough questions; same with Wall Street people and Hollywood stars, athletes …no personal appearances, they are divorced from interpersonal interaction.
(21:50): These politicians, into the 90s would go out and meet their constituents and they’d get feedback. They’d find out; and this went on almost into the Obama years, really through the Bush years, the Town Halls, people coming back, you know getting out of Congress for recess, they’d come back and they’d have Town Halls and people would show up and say things. And then it stopped. That’s gone now and of course, with the Covid stuff it’s completely gone.You know, at first they went to doing conference calls. They didn’t like people showing up and asking unscripted questions, then they moved to this conference-call model.And that became a popular thing, particularly for Democrats.Democrats started walling themselves off from their constituents and of course the Republicans followed soon after.Now it’s all zoom-sessions.I get e-mails every once in a while, and you just can’t log-in and start asking them questions. First of all, you have to send them a copy of your I.D., then they allow you to log-in, and then you ask a question and it goes in the queue and someone asks it, you can’t just ask this person what you want to ask; you’re just a prop, it’s just a show that’s put on, it has no meaning what-so-ever.And if you try to get on, and look, I have, I’ve tried to get on some of these to ask some tough questions, there’s no way in the world you’re going to get through to ask that tough question.
And we see this of course in our politics, in our elections.
In Hillary Clinton’s campaign in 2016, all the people in the Town Halls that she was holding, they were just staffers playing make-believe. They were just hiring people as actors to ask questions that they knew in advance.Biden didn’t even bother. He just stayed in a basement for a year. He didn’t even go outside. It’s a strange thing. We no longer have any connection to these guys.
And this has happened in parallel with other areas of our society that have become insular.Wall Street for example. That is a self contained universe. If you work in Wall Street, you have no connection with normal people. You work in these firms, you socialize in these firms, you party in these firms, everything’s inside that world. You don’t go outside that world. You’re whole reality is now inside of it. ..the same is true of Hollywood.
You know, it used to be Hollywood people, actors / actresses, made a lot of personal appearances. You don’t see that anymore. That hardly ever happens.
Athletes, they still do some. But it used to be quite common. I remember when I was a little kid in the back water where I grew up, it wasn’t unusual for a sports ball guy to come through at least once a year, in some event that we were having, some big thing, someone would figure out a way to get this guy, whatever he did, baseball or football or something like that, maybe a retired guy, or just recently retired and then he would show up and sign autographs.This was a thing that happened all the time.Again, athletes still do some amount of it, or a fair amount of it. But it’s greatly reduced. Hollywood people do none of that anymore. They’ve got bodyguards to beat the hell out of anyone that gets too close to them.You can take this even further.The mass media.When I was a young guy, there were newspaper people, most of them lived in normal neighborhoods, they lived around everyone else. Some of the richer ones, the ones who’d been around a long time, no, they didn’t, they moved into some pricier digs; but you know, your typical reporter, you know, he was a middle class guy. You go back further, it was a working class job. Those guys were working class people, they lived in working class neighborhoods. Today, they all live in middle class or upper middle class compounds. They’re not around us.And it really is kind of a weird thing, you know… it you watch, say, a TV show, you know, a Cable chat show and this person’s being interviewed, you know, the person on the Cable chat show is making a quarter million dollars a year, half a million dollars a year maybe, maybe more – like in Tucker Carlson’s case, ten million dollars a year. He lives in a mansion. Sean Hannity, lives in a mansion. And so, he has no connection with the rest of us. Interviewing someone who doesn’t live anywhere near us doesn’t interact with us anymore.It’s a strange sort of play that’s put on in front of us by people that we don’t know and they don’t know us. They don’t know anything about us; they don’t know anything about our lives.And so this normal feedback loop has been broken.And its getting worse, because the children of these people now, who are adults, the second generation, they had no exposure. They grew up in a completely isolated world. They went to private schools, they lived in nice neighborhoods, that are upper middle class – in the case of say, Washington (D.C.),, toney neighborhoods around the Capitol. Or if they’re Wall Street people, toney neighborhoods in Connecticut. You know, you get the idea; and they haven’t had any interaction with the rest of us. This is why, I think, our ruling class is becoming increasingly weird to the rest of us.(26:20): It’s strange what we’re seeing. I guess I’ve reached a point where I’m not outraged. I’m baffled, really. You know, for example, why in the world would Joe Biden appoint a tranny to Health and Human Services or whatever the heck she’s gonna do? It’s gonna do, or he’s gonna do, or whatever it’s called? Why would anyone do that?Frankly, the number of men walking around, believing that their penis is imaginary and that they’re a woman, is tiny. It rounds to zero.In my life, and I’ve been around a lot. I’ve seen a lot of things. I’ve seen things that most people will never see. I have actually seen in person, three trannies. Three, in my whole life. Three trannies, and one of them was outside in Key West when my friends and I were walking around; we drove down, were on a drinking trip in Key West and there was some sort of club there, like I said it was a tranny club. There was one or two of them standing outside. Maybe I saw four, I don’t know. But that’s it, I mean there’s just not that many in this world. I mean the number of trans people is less than one percent, like .3%. So where does the constituency put this?Most people, 99% of people, probably 95 percent of people at least, think that this is very weird, this is strange and if they found themselves in the presence of some man in a dress, they’re gonna make sure that their kids are not going to be exposed to this. They’re going to try and get themselves away from this person. That’s just the way it is.So who the hell is he appealing-to here?Who is the audience for this?It’s the same thing, you know, one of his big, bold moves is that he’s now going to let trannies into the military. You know, Trump had put a ban on that; and you know, if you’re a man in the army, or you’re in the military, and there’s some dude walking around dressed as a woman, I mean think of how absurd that is. Just the ridiculousness of it. How could you take yourself seriously, how could you have pride in your uniform – pride in the thing that your doing, pride in your service…when there’s some pervert in a dress walking around. You know, who makes all the same claims to honor and duty and service as you make.It’s crazy.Again, whose the audience for this? Who is he appealing to?Well, the audience is all those other people in the bubble, the bubble that he lives in. It’s the bubble that all his advisors live in; because they all know each other, they all talk to each other.They don’t know anything outside of their bubble.They actually think that this is a popular thing. They’re convinced that the great mass of people were offended by Trump not allowing trannies in the military.It’s crazy, but they do believe it because guess what? In their world, that’s true.In their world, a man in a dress is brave and bold and so forth.It’s the same thing with the pronoun business.Think about this, how nutty that is, I don’t care how young you are…even if you’re in your twenties.Most of your life, pronouns were a pretty straight forward thing, you mastered those somewhere, second grade, third grade maybe, I don’t know…(29:14) ..it’s been a long time, don’t remember.
But you know, you had a pretty good handle on them (pronouns) before you even got to school. You understood what pronouns were: boys were “he”, “him”, girls were “her”, “she”, wasn’t that hard.
And now all of a sudden, in that world, it’s considered important, you know, you have to list your pronouns. I have gotten e-mails from people in that sphere, they’ll have their job title, and then they’ll have their pronouns under it. In and e-mail. I mean, think of how warped that is.And when you talk to these people, it’s pretty clear that there’s this weird invisible barrier – in my case, between them and me.They have a sense of reality that’s not the same as mine.And particularly when you bump up in the sort of practical matters, which is often what I’m dealing with.. I think, how is it that everything doesn’t just catch on fire and burn down? they don’t operate by the same rules that govern my universe.They’re operating by a different set of rules.They think the most ridiculous and silly things are important.They’ll invest a tremendous amount of time in some weird ceremonial thing. ..or ritual thing about like pronouns or something like that. They think that’s important.And I think its this insularity; that these people, once they go into the system, lets say He’s a normal person and THEY run for Congress and THEY get into politics, quickly that door slams behind them.They stop dealing with normal people every day.
And before long they’re dealing with nothing but people inside the tent.It goes back to this Solzhenitsyn story back from the pre-Revolution days in Russia. Everyone in this intellectual class, this pseudo intellectual class that was forming up in Russia, the most important thing to them was that they all agreed with each other.They all held the same opinions and that’s what mattered.And if the opinions were weird or strange or contradictory, it didn’t matter. What mattered is that they held those opinions; because that was important inside.What was going on outside didn’t matter.And that’s what we’ve really had going on here.Our political class, to which I would include the media, to some degree the academy, ah, certainly the financial sector, big corporations…They’ve become untethered from the rest of us, they’ve become divorced from the rest of us. And that’s why they’re acting so strange and weird.To them, everything is normal. That’s why they’re not responding to public outrage.They’re not responding to the normal feedback because they’re cut off from that feedback.And living in a very isolated world, at some point, it seems to me at some point this is going to become a bigger problem than just guys walking around in dresses and telling us what their pronouns are.[boom noise; end of segment]
To us, these people are completely crazy, they may as well be speaking in tongues, their own political Esperanto.
To shed some light on this, I want to read a little of this Breitbart piece: “Trump’s impeachment would bring unity to our country.”
“The incitation toward the insurrection that led to the attack on the capital… the citation to insurrection; this is very serious, an attack on on the very foundation of our democracy.”This is insane, crazy talk.
Romney is one of the most repugnant figures that I’ve ever seen in politics..Thumbing your nose at half the country who put up with five years of media campaigning against Trump and his election, how’s that going to bring unity?What attack on the foundation of democracy?
In another story, anti Trumpist Eric Swalwell is compromised by a Chinese honey pot; is not contrite but elevated in the party. This guy is at the top of the security apparatus and remains there.
In another section I mentioned that the French Revolution offered up good comparisons. The thing that seemed to move the revolution along was that old regime didn’t seem to be aware, to consider how people outside the regime were seeing things, they were only seeing things inside their world.You know, that’s what you see here; Mit Romney spends all his time around people in Washington, he doesn’t talk to normal people; so this gobbledygook that he spills out just sounds perfectly normal to him…They look at the unity thing as important.They look at Trump as having divided them, they don’t care about anything else, that’s why they want unity.That’s why they want to throw all these Trump people in jail.We’re now ruled by people who are so different from the rest of us that they may as well be foreigners, they may as well be aliens.These people look increasingly foreign and weird to us because they are foreign and weird. – we do feel, because we are ruled by foreigners.[boom noise ending segment]
…
Brooklyn Daily Eagle, 31 Mar 2017
Hannah Senesh Community Day School is a progressive, independent K-8 Jewish day school located at 342 Smith St. in Carroll Gardens. Its students are drawn from a diversity of Jewish backgrounds.
In front of a sold-out audience, Steinem and Heffernan, who is a Senesh parent, discussed the values that influenced Steinem’s campaigns for gender equality and human rights.
The talk ranged from Steinem’s suffragist Jewish grandmother, to the Passover Seders she participated in, to her thoughts about religion in general.
Steinem also spoke about the relationship between feminism and Judaism, characterizing Judaism as “a religion that continues to want justice on earth and that idea of justice is contagious.”
On being Christian. Then Jewish. Then Christian again.
Fit Yourself Club, 20 Nov 2016
Virginia Heffernan, 47, the author of Magic and Loss: The Internet as Art, converted to Judaism when she got married. When the relationship ended, the New Yorker converted back.
In my twenties I called myself a moderately devout Episcopalian. I had a sturdy faith, but I went to church only on Easter or Christmas. Then my fiancé, who was raised as an Orthodox Jew and wanted his children to be matrilineally Jewish, asked me to convert before we married. And so at age 33 I began converting to Conservative Judaism. It’s a complex process. As part of the ritual, the rabbi turned me away three times. I had to study the Torah for a year and reject holidays like Christmas.
At first I thought my conversion would be like moving from Illinois to Indiana, a practical adjustment; but it was much stranger, like moving from Illinois to the color blue. A prayer from childhood would come to mind, and I would think, No, no, you’re Jewish now, you can’t do that. Converting tore me up inside and caused tension in my marriage. My husband wanted me to try harder; I wanted him to appreciate what I had already done, learned, and given up.
Our marriage ended, and when it did, I went to my rabbi and asked, “What will become of me?” He looked very sad. Eventually I decided to go back to the Episcopal Church. For Episcopalians, conversion can be as simple as accepting Jesus, but because the Jewish conversion was so arduous, I liked the idea of marking the passage back with a ceremony called reconciliation. My priest put his hand on my forehead and said, “You’re forgiven” — for apostasy, or turning my back on my religion — “and you never need to be forgiven again.” I still cry when I think about it.
“Disparate Impact”, an evil legal doctrine in US jurisprudence.
It’s clear that (((Frame Games))), an (((interloper))) on White advocacy, is playing a (((frame game))) in which he is trying to say that Jewish abuse of “social sciences” (viz., against Whites) is an inherent problem of these disciplines (and the answer is right wing scientism against this social “left”) when in fact the problem is not inherent in these disciplines, the problem is inherent in the Jewish abuse of these disciplines.
This disingenuous angle that he is taking in order to encourage right wing reaction and identity among Whites follows my hypothesis of what the YKW are trying to do – make “the left”, i.e. a proper sense of social unionization/organization of non Jewish groups, particularly Whites, against them, into “the problem”, replacing it with a misdirecting characterology of “The Left” as the “enemy” – now that they have hegemony in the 7 – 10 power niches:
1) Money 2) Religion 3) Politics, 4) Law and Courts 5) Academia 6) Media (mutating into control of internet choke points and additional tech interactive control) 7) Business/international business [add Foundations, NGO’s], 8) Military tech and cyberwarfare, 9) Organized Crime.
That is, they don’t want you to do any of that lefty social organizing and unionizing now that they are on top; they don’t want you to realize that that lefty organizing of their group interests was largely how they attained hegemonic power – they want you to believe that lefty organizing is your problem; that they got to where they are through objective right wing merit, through pure objective scientifically warranted facts – lol.
Anti-Racism is anti-social classification (unionization being one form thereof, ethno-nationalism another, and these forms can overlap). This prohibition is Cartesian, it is not innocent, it is hurting and it is killing people.
It blocks accountability to social historical capital and social systemic patterns of human ecology.
Right wingers are usually reacting to a system – and people – that they don’t want to be a part of; often quite rightly so.
In the case of Jews, however, their right wing advocacy is motivated by not wanting You goyim to be a part of a coherent, autonomously unionized social system.
Nevertheless, Frame Games is assimilating some of the better talking points and concerns of White advocacy; and in his attempt to ingratiate himself to White right wing reaction, he is providing some insights that we can use; such as this horror:
Frame Games: (In the Jewish academic world he came into) “I was encouraged to put the threatening line of inquiry, my love of science and biology aside and to study law instead.
But one of the things that first shocked me on my red pill journey was a class in Constitutional Law. I thought I’d left biology behind…
Then we got to the section on the 1964 Civil Rights Act…
And how THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE has been re-interpreted away from equal to where any White over representation is considered prima facie evidence of racial discrimination.
A lot of people think of affirmative action being the exception to the equal protection clause…. if you only knew how deep it goes…
Are you guys familiar with “disparate impact”? …..a legal doctrine
“Disparate Impact is probably the most evil and disgusting piece of distoriionary nuclear fall-out in American jurisprudence.
What it says is that:
If there are racially neutral laws on the books or racially neutral practices at any corporation or government agency, if they have the effect of creating disparate impact on different groups – that is, if there are racial differences that emerge even where they are racially neutral by law, by practice, by custom, then it is presumed as prima facie evidence of racial discrimination and allows anybody to launch a civil rights law-suit against you with TREBLE –
A law suit against you with Treble damages – that means three times damages from whatever you suffered. So, Disparate Impact means that no matter what you do, if you are a company, you are a solo practitioner, if you are a government agency, no matter what you do, if racial differences emerge you are liable unless you can prove, that is, the burden of proof is on you to show that you are PROACTIVELY DISCRIMINATING (for blacks/browns and against Whites, against Asians too, really, as they have to score 400 points higher than blacks on SAT’s to get the same university slots).
This is a common law doctrine.”
Posted by “Disparate Impact” on Mon, 21 May 2018 10:02 | #
Frame Games: (By this Jewish academic world) “I was encouraged to put the threatening line of inquiry, my love of science and biology aside and to study law instead.
But one of the things that first shocked me on my red pill journey was a class in Constitutional Law. I thought I’d left biology behind…
Then we got to the section on the 1964 Civil Rights Act…
And how THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE has been re-interpreted away from equal to where any White over representation is considered prima facie evidence of racial discrimination.
A lot of people think of affirmative action being the exception to the equal protection clause…. if you only knew how deep it goes…
Are you guys familiar with “disparate impact”? …..a legal doctrine
“Disparate Impact is probably the most evil and disgusting piece of distoriionary nuclear fall-out in American jurisprudence.
What it says is that:
If there are racially neutral laws on the books or racially neutral practices at any corporation or government agency, if they have the effect of creating disparate impact on different groups – that is, if there are racial differences that emerge even where they are racially neutral by law, by practice, by custom, then it is presumed as prima facie evidence of racial discrimination and allows anybody to launch a civil rights law-suit against you with TREBLE –
A law suit against you with Treble damages – that means three times damages from whatever you suffered.
So, Disparate Impact means that no matter what you do, if you are a company, you are a solo practitioner, if you are a government agency, no matter what you do, if racial differences emerge you are liable unless you can prove, that is, the burden of proof is on you to show that you are PROACTIVELY DISCRIMINATING (for blacks/browns and against Whites, against Asians too, really, as they have to score 400 points higher than blacks on SAT’s to get the same university slots).
This is a common law doctrine.”
Posted by DanielS on Mon, 21 May 2018 19:16 | #
It’s pretty clear that (((Frame Game))) is playing a (((frame game))) in which he is trying to say that Jewish abuse of “social sciences” (viz., against Whites) is an inherent problem of these disciplines (and the answer is right wing scientism against this social “left”) when in fact the problem is not inherent in these disciplines, it’s inherent in the Jewish abuse of these disciplines.
(((Frame Games))) on ethnic component of 2008 crisis & why you need to care about identity politics
Representing the largest part of the economy, real estate is followed by government and then the financial industry proper.
(((Frame Games))) narrates a history culminating in the 2008 financial crisis/real estate melt-down: beginning with the riots of the 1960’s by which blacks effectively extorted property owners; followed by the 1968 Rumford Fair Housing Act which prohibited discrimination with regard to whom one rents or sells …to a bomb being set with ‘The Community Reinvestment Act of 1977”; then Clinton’s lighting the fuse on these race based programs, which forced banks to make risky loans to blacks (a capacity compounded by taking down the Glass-Steagall Act); to objectivist Greenspan’s instigation of the housing bubble, including with “creative investment mediums”; and finally the 2008 melt down – the biggest theft in American and possibly all known history.
Posted by illegal to be race nuetral/to not be race neutral on Fri, 20 Jul 2018 17:21 | #
It is illegal to be race neutral, it is illegal to not be race neutral.
Characteristic Talmudic law, entirely contingent upon interpretation – in this case, of the judge.
Posted by From Small (((Obama ACORNS grow big financial crisis))) on Tue, 24 Jul 2018 05:32 | #
From (((The Clinton Administration))) to Obama ACORNS grow big subprime mortgage meltdown in 2008: and a bail-out of the YKW and right wing sell-outs, who then cleaned up on the bust cycle.
(((Frame Games))) aims to defuse White Left Ethnonationalism and its coalition building with other left nationals in response to the YKW-right wing-black-extortionist-Muslim-comprador alliance and its cataclysm for White, Asian, Amerindian human and pervasive ecology.
(((Frame Games))) tries to divert as much blame as possible to White right wing sell outs (who do, in fact, deserve at least half the blame) and away from the YKW (who do, in fact, deserve at least half of the blame).
Jewish Community Relationship Council
Posted by My Religiously Polite Mom Always Buys Courtley… on Mon, 28 May 2018 14:45 | #
There is an acrynomal sentence which allows one to easily remember the nine planets:
My (Mercury)
Very (Venus)
Elegant (Earth)
Mother (Mars)
Just (Jupiter)
Served (Saturn)
Us (Uranus)
Nine (Neptune)
Pizzas (Pluto)
Another acrynomal sentence might be proposed to facilitate quick recall of the seven choke points of YKW power:
My Religiously Polite Mother Always Buys Courtley Assistance to Negotiate Ostentatious Coalitions
My (actually their Media – which has extended from times of Judeo-Christian bible to Internet choke points and advanced interactive and mobile technology – e.g., to be used in cyber warfare).
Religiously (Religion – The Abrahamic religions beginning with the monotheistic Judaism and “evangelizing” its monotheistic, imperialistic Noahide law through Christianity and Islam).
Polite (Politics, usually backing both/all “legitimate”, “opposing sides” in a political system, so that they can play them off one another to their favor generally, but not lose in serving their interests, either way).
Mother (Money: finance, perhaps the mother of all capacity to buy people off in a desperate, neo-liberal, no account ant-ethnonationalist union system – whether buying off right wingers and having them oppose White unions and other anti-Jewish supremacist unions in coalitions, or funding anti-White coalitions straight out; financing unprofitable but psychologically destructive anti-racist/race mixing media; or to fund law careers and coerce political careers to change the laws, as in the case of “disparate impact”) …etc. anywhere where there are poor, desperate people, perhaps threatened with loss of livelihood, property, freedom and life, they might easily be bought off as opposed to taking the side of their own whose patterned merits are jaded, dubious – made basely selfish and unsympathetic for the decades, and centuries even, of liberal and right wing destruction, for absence a true moral order in service of their homeostatic systemic interests, their accountable, participatory place therein).
In finance, the boom-bust cycle they’ve marshaled with “democratic socialist outreach” – like Fannie Mae (low interest, risky loans required to be given to blacks)/ “objectivist austerity” through Reagan, Thatcher and following the 2008 bail-out (among the biggest thefts ever in history), getting behind coalitions with right wing, recently “alt-right” propaganda against “the left” – which might otherwise ensconce consciousness to see them in their power niches, and provide for activism against it to marshal social organizational power to do something about it.
Related Story: Orthodox Jewish boys go secular, reap compound fortune in another Jewish tradition – loan sharking.
Always (Academics: as (((Frame Games))) has acknowledged and my experience bears-out, the YKW are always determined to have hegemony in academics, since that’s where top-down power and influence is established; as demonstrated through their nepotistic, unmerited hegemony at Harvard and other Ivy league colleges. The Ivy league are the gate way to the professions, political and public influence. It is the way to connect empathically with the anxieties of youth and direct them by selling them on talk that serves YKW interests, creating phony “movements” and ‘rebellions” that they can be a part of…
Buys (Business, international and domestic – in this part of the cycle, securing US real estate with Russian (((mafia))) money bailing out Trump’s domestic assets and helping him to advance to the presidency. US domestic (((business))) has emerged as a “concern” to bolster (((neoconservative))) backing of Trump in order to garner bible belt, evangelical sympathy for the Zionist agenda and its operation clean break implementation in Iran) … Plenty of other shady (((business))), ranging from H1b Visas, cheap business loans for Indians to buy-up convenience stores and motels, in order to gain Indian connection and cooperation …then there is the off-shore money laundering schemes through shell companies revealed in the Panama Papers…
Related story: 3 of Them Defraud London Olympics Investors of £80 million.
Courtly Assistance (Courts and Attorneys – to influence law and its implementation, as in the example of “Brown vs.Board of Education”, “Disparate Impact”, the “Civil Rights Act”, the “Rumford Fair Housing Act”)
…so where to NGO’s – like Jewish Community Relationship Council – and Unions (make shift “unions”/ and coalitions thereof) – fit in? hmmm….
..going to have to add that in; should have long ago:
Negotiating (NG0’s)
Organized Crime
Coalitions (of social group organizations – coalitions of liberal social groups, liberal in the sense of denying and scabbing White social unionization. These are social communitarian groups primarily devised by Jewish interests in coalition building of anti-White organizations).
Posted by I feel offended. on Sat, 02 Jun 2018 10:39 | #
Gov. UK, “A Definition of Antisemitism”, 30 March 2016:
Authored article.
A definition of antisemitism
The problem of antisemitism continues to be a serious one. One issue is the absence of an agreed international definition of antisemitism.
As attacks across Europe and more broadly demonstrate, the problem of antisemitism continues to be a serious one. The UK works closely with our international partners to tackle antisemitism, and for this reason, the Government has recently supported the publication of a British Best Practice Guide to tackling antisemitism, available online here.
Antisemitism continues to affect communities around the UK. The most recent Community Security Trust report recorded 924 individual incidents during the course of 2015. The Government is committed to ensuring that British people of all faiths and ethnicities can live without fear of abuse or attack.
One issue identified by international partners, is the absence of an agreed international definition of antisemitism.
In the UK we use this definition of hate crime in general:
“Hate crimes and incidents are taken to mean any crime or incident where the perpetrator’s hostility or prejudice against an identifiable group of people is a factor in determining who is victimised.”
The UK Government’s overall policy is that it is up to the victim to determine whether a crime against them was motivated by any particular characteristics. This builds trust in the police among minority communities, and allows flexibility in our response.
However, for those seeking a definition of antisemitism, the UK’s College of Policing does include a working definition of antisemitism in their guidance to police forces in the UK. The full guidance is available from their website here and the definition is reproduced in full here:
Antisemitism is a certain perception of Jews, which may be expressed as hatred toward Jews. Rhetorical and physical manifestations of antisemitism are directed toward Jewish or non-Jewish individuals and/or their property, toward Jewish community institutions and religious facilities.
In addition, such manifestations could also target the state of Israel, conceived as a Jewish collectivity. Antisemitism frequently charges Jews with conspiring to harm humanity, and it is often used to blame Jews for “why things go wrong.” It is expressed in speech, writing, visual forms and action, and employs sinister stereotypes and negative character traits.
Contemporary examples of antisemitism in public life, the media, schools, the workplace, and in the religious sphere could, taking into account the overall context, include, but are not limited to:
Calling for, aiding, or justifying the killing or harming of Jews in the name of a radical ideology or an extremist view of religion.
Making mendacious, dehumanizing, demonizing, or stereotypical allegations about Jews as such or the power of Jews as collective — such as, especially but not exclusively, the myth about a world Jewish conspiracy or of Jews controlling the media, economy, government or other societal institutions.
Accusing Jews as a people of being responsible for real or imagined wrongdoing committed by a single Jewish person or group, or even for acts committed by non-Jews.
Denying the fact, scope, mechanisms (e.g. gas chambers) or intentionality of the genocide of the Jewish people at the hands of National Socialist Germany and its supporters and accomplices during World War II (the Holocaust). Accusing the Jews as a people, or Israel as a state, of inventing or exaggerating the Holocaust.
Accusing Jewish citizens of being more loyal to Israel, or to the alleged priorities of Jews worldwide, than to the interests of their own nations.
Examples of the ways in which antisemitism manifests itself with regard to the State of Israel taking into account the overall context could include:
Denying the Jewish people their right to self-determination, e.g., by claiming that the existence of a State of Israel is a racist endeavor.
Applying double standards by requiring of it a behavior not expected or demanded of any other democratic nation.
Using the symbols and images associated with classic antisemitism (e.g., claims of Jews killing Jesus or blood libel) to characterize Israel or Israelis.
Drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.Holding Jews collectively responsible for actions of the state of Israel.
However, criticism of Israel similar to that leveled against any other country cannot be regarded as antisemitic. Antisemitic acts are criminal when they are so defined by law (for example, denial of the Holocaust or distribution of antisemitic materials in some countries).
Criminal acts are antisemitic when the targets of attacks, whether they are people or property – such as buildings, schools, places of worship and cemeteries – are selected because they are, or are perceived to be, Jewish or linked to Jews.
Antisemitic discrimination is the denial to Jews of opportunities or services available to others and is illegal in many countries.
Published 30 March 2016
Posted by The NGO shake down. on Tue, 19 Jun 2018 02:49 | #
NGO shake down as illustrated by the Philadelphia Starbucks case.
(((Frame Games))) discussing how (((left organizations))) shake down (((Starbucks))).
Posted by “Civil Rights” groups shake-down of corporations on Tue, 26 Jun 2018 03:58 | #
…and businesses.
“Civil Rights” groups hyperbolic shake-down of corporations, part 2.
Posted by Industrialized, mass pay-offs to blacks on Wed, 11 Jul 2018 05:22 | #
Part III of the industrialization of massive pay-offs to blacks: examples range from American inner cities to Brazil’s massive affirmative action campaigns.
Posted by Congress is 3x more Jewish than US on Thu, 01 Aug 2019 17:03 | #
Congress is now 3 times more Jewish than the United States as a whole
No orange ones, Huckabee or dogs allowed: private property, freedom of association or “civil rights”
Of course WN should go with the angle that it was the prerogative of the restaurateur to discriminate and throw her out as a matter of private business/property and freedom of association. This can begin to challenge the (((64 Civil Rights Act))) which violates the capacity (of Whites, anyway) to discriminate on behalf of their private property, business and prerogative of association.
Telegraph, “Restaurant owner who asked Sarah Sanders to leave says she was taking moral stand against Donald Trump”, 24 June 2018:
Sarah Sanders, the White House press secretary, was refused service at a restaurant on Friday, sparking angry accusations that Donald Trump’s aides are the target of liberal “bigotry”.
Mrs Sanders said she had been asked to leave by the owner of the Red Hen, about three hours drive outside Washington.
The story was confirmed by the restaurant’s owner who said she felt she had to take a stand against for “honesty” and “compassion”.
Mrs Sanders wrote on Twitter: “I was told by the owner of Red Hen in Lexington, Virginia to leave because I work for the president and I politely left.
“Her (the owner’s) actions say far more about her than about me. I always do my best to treat people, including those I disagree with, respectfully and will continue to do so.”
The confrontation comes at a particularly tense time in American politics, with protests growing over the Trump administration’s zero-tolerance border policy that has separated children from parents. It follows months and years of growing polarisation in American politics – the cause and effect of Mr Trump’s rise to power.
Republicans lost no time in accusing liberals of policing restaurants.
Mrs Sanders’ father Mike Huckabee, the former Republican presidential candidate, said: “Bigotry. On the menu at Red Hen Restaurant in Lexington, Virginia. Or you can ask for the ‘Hate Plate’. And appetisers are ‘small plates for small minds’.”
Earlier in the week, Mr Trump’s homeland security secretary, Kirstjen Nielsen, cut short a dinner at a Mexican restaurant after protesters shouted “Shame!” until she left.
The Red Hen Credit: Daniel LinMrs Sanders’ treatment at the restaurant created a social media commotion with people on both sides weighing in.
On Yelp, a reviewer of the restaurant wrote: “Don’t eat here if you’re a Republican, wearing a MAGA hat or a patriot.”
But other reviewers supported the restaurant owner’s actions.
Both sides of the debate have been leaving comments on the restaurant’s social media sites Credit: Daniel Lin/APOne said: “12/10 would recommend. Bonus: this place is run by management who stuck up for their beliefs and who are true Americans.” The restaurant was in the town of Lexington, population 7,000, which voted heavily against Mr Trump.
Stephanie Wilkinson, co-owner of the tiny 26-seat eaterie, said she was at home when staff called to tell her Mrs Sanders was dining and she went to see.
She told the Washington Post: “I’m not a huge fan of confrontation. I have a business, and I want the business to thrive.
“But this feels like the moment in our democracy when people have to make uncomfortable actions and decisions to uphold their morals.”
When she got there Mrs Sanders, her husband and several others had cheese boards in front of them.
Ms Wilkinson consulted her staff who had all seen Mrs Sander defending the separation of illegal immigrant families at the border. The staff said they wanted Mrs Sanders to leave.
Ms Wilkinson said she went to Mrs Sanders, told her she was the owner, and asked her on to the patio “for a word”.
She said: “I was babbling a little, but I got my point across in a polite and direct fashion. I explained that the restaurant has certain standards that I feel it has to uphold, such as honesty, and compassion, and cooperation. I said ‘I’d like to ask you to leave’.”
Mrs Sanders was polite and said simply: “That’s fine. I’ll go.”
Her party followed her out, offering to pay, but were told they did not need to.
Someone claiming to be a member of the waiting staff posted details of the incident on social media, including a memo about Mrs Sanders being 86ed – slang for ejecting someone.
The details were forwarded in a tweet by Brennan Gilmore, the executive director of environmental group Clean Virginia.
Related at Majorityrights: “Women Without Class”
Posted by Red Hens on Tue, 14 May 2019 18:43 | #
RESTAURANT THAT ASKED SARAH SANDERS TO LEAVE IS DOING ‘BETTER THAN GOOD,’ OWNER SAYS 11 MONTHS AFTER BACKLASH
n owner of the Red Hen restaurant in Lexington, Virginia, who last June asked White House press secretary Sarah Sanders to leave, said her business is doing “better than good” after weathering a barrage of criticism including from President Donald Trump.
“After nearly a year, I’m happy to say that business is still good. Better than good, actually,” co-owner Stephanie Wilkinson wrote in an op-ed published Tuesday in The Washington Post. “Besides the boost to our area charities, our town’s hospitality and sales revenue have gone up, too.”
Wilkinson recounted the incident, which she wrote came about at the height of press scrutiny on the Trump administration’s “heinous practice” of separating migrant children from their parents, a “horror” felt at her restaurant.
“I took Ms. Sanders aside and politely suggested she leave. She agreed, equally politely,” Wilkinson wrote. “She may or may not have expected this day would come, but she never showed any sign of outrage or even much surprise. We’d drawn a line; she’d accepted it.”
Wilkinson’s refusal to serve Sanders, which led to the press secretary and her family leaving the restaurant, drew tremendous backlash from conservatives. Some alleged that liberals do not face the same level of public scrutiny in everyday life for their political beliefs.
Crypsis deployed for Starbucks property vulture (((Harold Schultz))) in launch of political campaign
Posted by DanielS on Saturday, 02 February 2019 15:44.
I haven’t visited Morgoth’s for several months, and not for more than a moment in over a year… but having taken a peek today, a fine comment jumped out…
Augur Mayson rendered a fine comment in response to the question of why people hate journalists.
In regard to his example that the (((media))) conveniently promulgated Harold Schultz’ crypsis, referring to him as “a white man”, Augur might have added discussion of which (((Frame Games))) spilled the beans – it is still on line: [url=The Perplexing Case of Starbucks The Perplexing Case of Starbucks) about the scheme that Starbucks is involved in, making deals with black NGO leaders in order to buy-up inner city property on the cheap and then gentrifying it to turn huge profits in sales and rent. …while these blacks were moved in as block busters to begin with by tribal elders who benefited by driving out Whites, taking advantage of driving down property values and welfare slum lording.
A Starbucks in your neighborhood means this racket is coming to your city.
One wonders, given Starbucks property vulturism, if Trump and his cronies don’t figure into the Schultz deal – as Kumiko surmised, they are mostly about a second tier of wealth, based on real estate investment, particularly U.S., and their concerns as such.
* I took the liberty to correct the malapopriative term, “left”, for him and replaced it with what it should be – “liberal”
Augur Mayson • 6 days ago
Because journalists enhance Jewish racial crypsis, is my current reason. They’re statists posing as rebels. The major media outlets either through commingling with the state or via self-interested owners of a certain ((( race ))) typically parrot whatever ridiculous claims are coming out of the government, either about domestic social issues or correctness of foreign policy. They are not some unelected but real check against government abuses. They are attack dogs. They are megaphones for the rich and the state. They are overwhelmingly
leftistsliberals* and disproportionately Jewish.For example, in America now the presidential election in 2020 is shaping up as follows: Trump for the Republicans, because it’s unprecedented for a party to not run an incumbent, unknown candidate for the Democrats, maybe Mrs. Clinton, maybe Joe Biden, maybe someone else, they have a young gay guy they’re trying to talk up now. And the only big independent as yet talked about in the media is former Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz, who’s a Jew, who has used Starbucks to push progressive social policies. For example a few Blacks got thrown out of a Starbucks for presumed loitering; media uproar ensued, Schultz declared to do the exact opposite in future, now they have beggars out front, heroin needles in one bathroom and people giving birth in the other.
So this article in the Judenpresse in America talks up Schultz and says point blank he’s a White man.
“And at 65, he’d have to do that as an older white man who’s never run for office before and has zero national name recognition.” https://www.theatlantic.com…
False, as a CEO of a major corporation he had major exposure and name recognition only second to say Hollywood stars and politicians and media. So the journalist paints Schultz as an unknown (read: underdog, as in, a fetching backstory) and says he’s White when he’s really a Jew.
This is why I hate journalists. Plus if you have a Jewish war you’d like to wage in the desert for no good reason you can always count on the likes of CNN or the BBC to carry the load of b.s. you’re pushing.
NEW YORK: Starbucks Chairman Howard Schultz, credited with taking the company from small beginnings to an international behemoth, is stepping down as CEO to focus on new high-end coffee shops, handing the reins to Chief Operating Officer Kevin Johnson.
Schultz, 63, will continue to serve as chairman of the Board and will be appointed executive chairman effective April next year. He handpicked 56-year-old Johnson, the company’s president, chief operating officer and a 7-year member of the Starbucks Board of Directors, to serve as the new CEO.
The Seattle-based company said in his new role, Schultz will focus on the “next wave of retail innovation”, design and development of Starbucks Reserve Roasteries around the world, expansion of the Starbucks Reserve retail store format and the company’s social impact initiatives.
“I will remain Starbucks executive chairman, focusing full-time on the incredible growth opportunities we have in expanding Roasteries and building out our portfolio of Reserve stores and on Starbucks social impact agenda which will be a significant part of the focus going forward,” Schultz said in an investor and media conference call yesterday.
Schultz, who was named by Fortune magazine this month in its list of Businessperson of Year is credited with doubling the company’s revenues since he returned for his second stint in 2008, surpassing USD 20 billion for the first time over the past 12 months
Read more at:
//economictimes.indiatimes.com/articleshow/55746311.cms?utm_source=contentofinterest&utm_medium=text&utm_campaign=cppst
Related at Majorityrights:
(((Frame Games))) Hardens-Up and Greg Johnson Presents His Right-Wing Rear For Entryism (as does JF)
(((Frame Games))) on ethnic component of 2008 crisis & why you need to care about identity politics
Test Your Capacity To See Through Jewish Crypsis: Which ones are Jewish?
Related:
The Perplexing Case of Starbucks: Frame Games discusses Starbucks with Gariepy
Comments:
Posted by mancinblack on Mon, 04 Feb 2019 19:17 | #
“Augur Mayson” is an arsehole but you know what is said of the one eyed man.
Posted by I believe it on Mon, 04 Feb 2019 21:07 | #
I believe you. But all kinds of people, including people listing right, get some things right sometimes…. so, we take what we might like and leave the rest.
Posted by Billy and Norvin on Tue, 05 Feb 2019 09:18 | #
Speaking of taking what you like and no endorsement of the individual or his views implied: Billy Roper has some interesting ideas – in the context of a discussion of Balkanization, he mentions that WN will not find a reliable ally in either YKW diaspora or Zionism because any separatist project, whether national sovereignty or balkanization, will threaten the power they derive of parasitism – in the case of Israel, the tens of millions a day and other resources it would lose by balkanization of the US, in addition to the break down of the political, cultural and military might that it exploits.
Posted by Verbo Tempestas on Wed, 06 Feb 2019 06:09 | #
Verbo Tempestas with Patrick Little
Little is a sharp dude, has keen insights, but his laser focus causes him to go soft on other groups to the point of proposing friendship with groups who are NOT friends of White interests. …a classic myopia.
Posted by Duel Citizens in Public Trust on Wed, 06 Feb 2019 07:29 | #
The idea of throwing duel citizens out of positions of public trust is particularly well warranted.
However, when Little speaks of the “phony divide and conquer distinction of right vs left” he is speaking like a typical right wing dupe.
Left ethnonationalism divides, yes – people loyal to the group and its bounds are divided from those who are not loyal to the group and its bounds, but to pseudo objectivity, transcendent “purity”, or exclusively to themselves and perhaps a narrow few others who are of no account to the people from whom they came.
Posted by (((Howard Schultz))) on Thu, 14 Feb 2019 09:22 | #
Howard Schultz Rips “Unrealistic” , “Immoral” Green New Deal
Potential 2020 presidential candidate Howard Schultz slammed Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’ “Green New Deal,” which he called “unrealistic” and “immoral.”
Speaking at a CNN town hall, Schultz – the billionaire Starbucks Chairman Emeritus suggested that Democrats be “truthful” about their environmental goals instead of just throwing ideas “against the wall because it’s a good slogan.”
“I read that by 2030 they’re suggesting that every building in America becomes clean energy, conforms to clean energy, just to put that in perspective, because it’s not realistic, that would mean that between 2,000 and 3,000 buildings a day would have to be reconstructed to conform to what they’re saying,” Schultz said. “So let’s be sensible about what we’re suggesting.”
– wouldn’t want to hurt his real estate racket.
Ibid:
Schultz, a spoiler candidate who pledged to drop out if it becomes clear he wouldn’t be able to win the 2020 election, also knocked grandiose job guarantees in the Green New Deal.
“I don’t understand how you’re going to give a job for everybody, how you’re going to give free college to everybody, how you’re going to create clean energy throughout the country in every building of the land,” he said. “I think it’s immoral to suggest that we can tally up $20, $30, $40, $50 trillion of debt to solve a problem that could be solved in a different way.
On Tuesday, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-KY) had some fun – rushing the “Green New Deal” resolution up for a vote in the Senate, forcing some Democrats to take a position on the controversial legislation.
Schultz also told the CNN town hall audience that he doesn’t see color.
“As somebody who grew up in a very diverse background as a young boy in the projects, I didn’t see color as a young boy and I honestly don’t see color now,” said the billionaire, responding to an audience question about an April 2018 racial profiling incident which took place in a Philadelphia Starbucks store after the manager called police on two black men who were waiting for a friend.
“Injustice in America of any kind—especially racial injustice, which continues—is not something that we should be proud of and we need to resolve,” said Schultz, when asked if he thought the incident would be an issue for voters, adding that the Philadelphia incident was “something that we learned a great deal from,” adding “We realized that we had a problem. And it’s a problem that I think exists widely in this country, and it’s something that I would characterize as unconscious bias that many of us have based on our own life experiences.”
“We have to be able to have uncomfortable conversations. We have to talk to people who are different than ourselves,” said Schultz. “We have to embrace the diversity of the nation.”
Related (counter argument):
This Radical Plan to Fund the ‘Green New Deal’ Just Might Work
Posted by (((Starbucks))) spread in Europe on Sat, 11 May 2019 15:33 | #
Simon Kuestenmacher
@simongerman600
19h19 hours ago
More
Map shows the number of Starbucks stores in Europe as of 2019. I am very sad that Italy now has three Starbucks. I loved the fact that they were a Starbucks-free zone for so long. Source: https://buff.ly/2WwQlDc
Starbucks is a part of a (((property vulturism scheme))) and its presence a sign that the brackets are moving in, not just to install one franchise, but to take control of an area.
(((Frame Games))) Hardens-Up and Greg Johnson Presents His Right-Wing Rear For Entryism (as does JF)
Posted by DanielS on Sunday, 20 May 2018 11:58.
We begin with the formula for infiltration – gaining entryism into the Alt Right/and the like White-Right – with a sympathetic voice of the YKW to join-in to tell their ‘red-pill’ story, their journey into race realism.” *
…and Frame Games begins:
“I was just a regular guy”… “I’ve been on this journey” ..(let him tell you what he’s discovered, fellow travelers of the Alt Right).
…because Jews are sufficiently taken as White by Whites and non White alike, he’d like to promote the crypsis by emphasizing “a new way forward”, promoting the asking of the question: “Is it good for White people” (as opposed to criticizing others).
Naivete is nothing new for his interlocutor in this podcast, Greg Johnson – this is the man who seriously entertains Vox Day, who ardently defended Mike Enoch despite all evidence of his dishonesty, who banned me from Counter-Currents for criticizing Mark Dyal’s interloping upon White advocacy.
Greg indeed provides for (((entryism))) – a viral poz opening:
” We have to have a certain openness to the enemy camp.”
Greg’s snobbery, his elitism ensconced with right wing “objectivism”, blinds him to the susceptibility to entryism by people who can impress him intellectually and with accomplishments and money, thus allowing them to influence, if not guide the narrative that he is supposed to be “stewarding”, of the lesser folks of the White pattern he would purport to steward in paternalistic elitism.
Frame Game 28:50:
“Is it good for Whites?” (Knowing that crypsis is going to fool people, non-Whites especially …hence in entryism, he wants to ingratiate himself with the question).
Now, in this discussion, none of my hypotheses about the right/altright/new right whatever right are disconfirmed. They are prone, as reactionaries into “objectivism” to blindness in their strained quest for pure factual, foundational warrant.
Nevertheless, in that quest they can be useful, indeed coming-up with and providing facts that are useful to our advocacy and, in their rigid focus, sometimes directing focus on matters that need critical attention – even the YKW seeking entryism can be useful, provided that you know that they are seeking to direct the narrative…
In his case, they are just doing what I’ve been saying right along, trying to maintain a controlled opposition to “the social justice warriors” (i.e., undergraduates they’ve trained, who might intersect to see just how unjust the YKW are in their hegemonic 7 niche perch) …. of the “righteously real, truthful, scientific right against the left and its ‘aversion to facts, science and reality’ ..it’s penchant for the bunk and hokum of psycho analysis and sociology ..which are all the real source of the problem” …along with people from lower ranks seeking money from law suits against wealthy Jews for their discrimination… ….not like us right wingers, us race realists, who love objective truth, science, and unequal merticocracy, as it were, now that the YKW are on top of the 7 niches….
With that, Frame Games plays the red capes: against “multiculturalism” preparing you by default to argue for integration in paleo conservatism, viz as Christians under the Jewish control of Noahide law ….as “huWhite people along with Jews in Western civilization …the Jewish diaspora in which Frame Games admits he is motivated to remain ensconced with his people … other people may spill blood to fight Islam (whom his people inflicted upon us – talk about “problem – reaction – solution”) and “Hispanics”, who right wingers have othered, mixed – sometimes only conceptually – sometimes in deliberate evil – but who they want to be the main enemy because they are not susceptible to pity the YKW, nor do they cooperate with their pet henchmen, the blacks.
36:10: To shine his pedigree, Johnson goes along with the reactionary right wing altercast, as he always has:
“Multiculturalism, it’s implicit imperialism…creates a situation where everyone’s homeless, nobody feels comfortable.”
[Of course, rather, it is integration with foreigners, not multiculturalism that does this.
Later Frame Game will make a big thing against another YKW red cape, “diversity” …similarly as multiculturualism, diverse and marginal input from within a system would strengthen it, lend perspective and stability, while the YKW have perverted the terms to where what is diverse and marginal comes from without the system and destroys it in the name of “diversity is our strength”…but the Frame Game will have you arguing against “the diversity business’ … he doesn’t so much want to allow for qualitative inputs from within the system but rather to argue for unequal quantification of the Jewish/White hybrid.]
Host, “Westward thought” chimes in …yes, women don’t feel comfortable as they are preyed upon by Muslims.”
Frame Game (38:00):
“My journey….I agree with the perils of multiculturalism – and value one dominant, normative White western civilization …within America too and in Europe (he’s talking about paleocon Judeo Christian, John K. Press “culturalism” of western civilization):
Viktor Orban has declared a Christian nation (((how good is that for Noahide culturalism?))).
…problems are solved by declaring normative, dominant culture.” (((full J.K. Press culturalism)))
Here he identifies with our reaction for solid warrant against the rhetoric of Jewish group advocacies… “I wanted to be an evolutionary psychologist, I wanted to be a scientist, was always interested in psychology of the mind (scientific objectivism plus Christianity is (((Frank Meyer’s))) Paleocon agenda)))…
…“they said I took evolutionary psychology too seriously (I’m such a rebel, like my fellow traveler KM)…This was before the replication crisis in psychology, cultural anthropology, sociology and all of those bankrupt fields…but…
David Buss’s Evolutionary Psychology (The New Science of The Mind) changed my life.
When we finally have a framework for understanding the human mind…
This is a way out of racial conflict, just understand that there is human biodiversity”
[this, HBD, is another concept and term that has been perverted into a red cape by the YKW – viz., horizontal, qualitative diversity has been perverted into I.Q. quantification and hierarchization
…take relativism and put it into the objectivist perversion of “HBD”]
…here comes the half-hearted, paleocon endorsement of nationalism …on behalf of the Zionists and diaspora – 46:30.
“I was an outstanding student, but then I had the nerve to talk science!
It’s the money! the money which has people blackballed for talking about human intelligence”…
(Thus), E.O. Wilson (was not able to overcome) Adorno, Marcuse…it’s because of the money (not Jewish ethnocentrism and sometimes costly bribing of right wing reactionaries and unprofitable propagandizing against them).
…note that there is lots of bundling “Hispanics” along with blacks as the enemy… keeps tucking that in…
Johnson jumps on the band wagon: “you Hispanics will simply re create the places that you come from – like Honduras”
..but Johnson does not ask how might a qualitative proportion of “Hispanics” interacting with Whites effect a collective society and their I.Q.? …are some of them good in non verbal I.Q.? – many are not that far removed from Japanese – could maybe contribute to a society for the better if managed properly?
….but Johnson concludes “their conditions (from which they came) are not independent variables from I.Q.”
Here Johnson gets snookered into the YKW Frame Game that they are trying to orchestrate to weasel entyrism into White right alliance and out of their internationalist left cross hairs, in which they were the sole union, the sole pure nepotists that they would stand for:
Johnson advocates a pure meritocracy to counteract the massive over representation of Jews in academia, including places like Harvard, where they can be as much as 40% of the student body, well beyond their objectively measured merit.
Of course Jews will go along with that for now as a stall-tactic to allow time them to re-gear..
…and for their gene hijacking and eugenics, they can still be over represented by a-racial “objectivism” beyond relative group interests of Whites et al.
Frame Game:
“If you understood just how much of the Jewish psyche is ingrained in higher education, what it is to the Jewish psyche…if their position was put into jeopardy, everyone with the name Green or Berg would be having a Russian revolution for the existential threat to their hegemonic control of universities.”
Johnson says that he is taking notes [by pandering to Johnson’s snobbish elite pedigreeist cronyism, they are getting him to swallow the idea that the objectivism that the Jews propose is the antidote, not a part of marshaling their false opposition].
……
Back to Frame Game’s story that’s supposed to ingratiate him to the Goyim –
And there IS some definite good to right wingers, even YKW ones who hope to gain entyism by ingratiation through truth, facts, etc, in that they can indeed provide facts and sharp focus where it is needed (just don’t let them take you where they want to go):
Frame Games: (By this Jewish academic world) “I was encouraged to put this threatening line of inquiry, my love of science and biology aside and to study law instead.
But one of the things that first shocked me on my red pill journey was a class in Constitutional Law. I thought I’d left biology behind…
Then we got to the section on the 1964 Civil Rights Act…
And how THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE has been re-interpreted away from equal to where any White over representation is considered prima facie evidence of racial discrimination.
A lot of people think of affirmative action being the exception to the equal protection clause…. if you only knew how deep it goes…
(in a slight American Southern – “Y’all know what I’m sayin’, i.e., that again” – accent):
Are you guys familiar with “disparate impact”? …..a legal doctrine
“Disparate Impact is probably the most evil and disgusting piece of distoriionary nuclear fall-out in American jurisprudence.
What it says is that:
If there are racially neutral laws on the books or racially neutral practices at any corporation or government agency, if they have the effect of creating disparate impact on different groups – that is, if there are racial differences that emerge even where they are racially neutral by law, by practice, by custom, then it is presumed as prima facie evidence of racial discrimination and allows anybody to launch a civil rights law-suit against you with TREBLE – A law suit against you with Treble damages – that means three times damages from whatever you suffered.
So, Disparate Impact means that no matter what you do, if you are a company, you are a solo practitioner, if you are a government agency, no matter what you do, if racial differences emerge you are liable unless you can prove, that is, the burden of proof is on you to show that you are PROACTIVELY DISCRIMINATING (for blacks/browns and against Whites, against Asians too, really, as they have to score 400 points higher than blacks on SAT’s to get the same university slots). This is a common law doctrine.”
….
Then Greggy fucks in -“the basic assumption is of “racial equality”
That’s not the basic assumption, the basic assumption is White guilt (as warrant for expropriation), presumed privilege and penchant for exploitation and genocide (of Jews especially) …the abstract presumption is more like people are to be treated as being in classificatory Noahide sameness, but with some having been unfairly discriminated against as Noahide family members, thus requiring to be compensatorily included – otherwise, paradoxically you are disingenuous/or classifcatory, a racist by definition.
With that Frame Game whisks the multiculturalism and diversity red cape..
Calling “diversity” simply a big money racket (not a Jewish mis-frame game) that has brought corporations to their knees, US governments as well … law suits have been a boon to lawyers, for those who must be hired as well, those who’ve been “discriminated against” and those people/firms who aid in the hiring, etc.
Greg Johnson: going with the “left = anti-science” narrative that the YKW are promulgating ….
“If Candace Owens and Kanye West are ‘on our side’ (with free market “conservatism” – right wing /objectivist/ race neutral, anti group interested liberalism) we should commend them without adjusting to them. Greg’s right-wing snobbery has a penchant for US Constitutional objectivism – as in the Mark Dyal/Nietzschean, anti bourgeoisie ruse.
…and so Frame Games has told his story, his “fair minded and objective” story… …like von Gold Farb, Reactionary Jew…
…like all entryists attempting to join cause with the White right…against “the left”….to unite in paleoconservatism.. …a darling of JF too, Frame Games is in this regard….
Again, like all right wingers, they can indeed provide important information and focus, which we should eagerly snap up, as in Frame Game’s discussion of “Disparate Impact”…
However, we should use that for our interests, not follow him/them into race neutral objectivism – against “the left’s” social advocacy – a right wing position that he is encouraging/bribing elitist snob Greg Johnson with ….only conceding the crypsis group advocacy of asking, “is it good for huWhites?” (((i.e, blending Jewish crypsis and their Zionist and diaspora interests with Whites, in unifying (((culturalism))), that is (((paleoconservatism))) against “the left”…
…against the White left, the White Class, White ethnonationalists.
Comments:
Posted by “Disparate Impact” on Mon, 21 May 2018 10:02 | #
Frame Games: (By this Jewish academic world) “I was encouraged to put the threatening line of inquiry, my love of science and biology aside and to study law instead.
But one of the things that first shocked me on my red pill journey was a class in Constitutional Law. I thought I’d left biology behind…
Then we got to the section on the 1964 Civil Rights Act…
And how THE EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSE has been re-interpreted away from equal to where any White over representation is considered prima facie evidence of racial discrimination.
A lot of people think of affirmative action being the exception to the equal protection clause…. if you only knew how deep it goes…
Are you guys familiar with “disparate impact”? …..a legal doctrine
“Disparate Impact is probably the most evil and disgusting piece of distoriionary nuclear fall-out in American jurisprudence.
What it says is that:
If there are racially neutral laws on the books or racially neutral practices at any corporation or government agency, if they have the effect of creating disparate impact on different groups – that is, if there are racial differences that emerge even where they are racially neutral by law, by practice, by custom, then it is presumed as prima facie evidence of racial discrimination and allows anybody to launch a civil rights law-suit against you with TREBLE –
A law suit against you with Treble damages – that means three times damages from whatever you suffered.
So, Disparate Impact means that no matter what you do, if you are a company, you are a solo practitioner, if you are a government agency, no matter what you do, if racial differences emerge you are liable unless you can prove, that is, the burden of proof is on you to show that you are PROACTIVELY DISCRIMINATING (for blacks/browns and against Whites, against Asians too, really, as they have to score 400 points higher than blacks on SAT’s to get the same university slots).
This is a common law doctrine.”
Posted by DanielS on Mon, 21 May 2018 19:16 | #
It’s pretty clear that (((Frame Game))) is playing a (((frame game))) in which he is trying to say that Jewish abuse of “social sciences” (viz., against Whites) is an inherent problem of these disciplines (and the answer is right wing scientism against this social “left”) when in fact the problem is not inherent in these disciplines, the problem is inherent in the Jewish abuse of these disciplines.
Posted by Not Elton on Wed, 23 May 2018 22:42 | #
Elton’s comment was taken down upon request, but it’s a shame as I (DanielS) see it, because I rather thought he had some insightful things to say regarding (((Framegames))) participation in White advocacy.
Posted by (((Controlled Media Structure))) on Tue, 05 Jun 2018 14:56 | #
A report by Frame Game on the state of the mainstream media industry in the US.
I’ll be adding some commentary later. Watch for the usual blaming of “social justice warriors” and “THE left.”
In a recent podcast, Luke Ford played video of a Maslowian psychologist misdrecting audience away from the social basis corrective and into a meager satisfaction with “relationships.”
In the same podcast, Luke Ford is playing audio of this other guy trying to corrupt the class angle, saying that we should not be arguing on racial grounds against the elites, but charging them with “class discrimination” when they keep Whites and Asians out of elite academia and so on… but his is really just playing the same old Cartesian/ objectivist individualist civil rights game against classificatory bounds.
This was from a Luke Ford Podcast in the first half of March 2021. I have to find the show and I will enter the names of the Maslowian and the guy pretending to argue on Class grounds when I find them.
Funny, this is a very old comment of mine that came stuck along with the material for this new post that I am re-assembling…
If people are going to keep going around making equality a straw man and non-equality the thing as opposed to paradigmatic difference(s) and race (class) being the matter, we’re going to create false comparisons and unnecessary, counter productive conflict; i.e., not that we should seek to avoid all conflict necessarily, but we do want the chips to fall on our side. (2)
You can see from this critical remark linking to a Brett Stevens discussion (with Robert Stark), that I was his already exposing his bullshit back in 2011.
Wouldn’t you know, Glow-The-Dark, Jewish hire, Brett Stevens, is back at it, promoting the (((marketing campaign))) over there at Affirmative Right (of course); talking about the characterology of “The Left”, how they do not deal with reality, how they are just jealous of accomplished people, trying to bring them down.
by Brett Stevens
My Religiously Polite Mom Always Buys Courtley Assistance to NegotiateGoodOrganized Union Coalition & Crime
Always quick to maintain the balance between our part as Whites, our fault as it were, in aiding or abetting the destruction of our borders and bounds, which I attribute to a general pattern of our penchant for anti-social, anti-relativist, right wing reaction to Jewish union and anti-White coalitions in hyperbolic abuse and misrepresentation of left concepts against us – i.e., which for us means hyperbolic liberalization of our social bounds – to which we react into kinds of objectivism and liberalism to seek “pure warrant” against this jaded sophist rhetoric against us …and as I am always vigilant and diligent to maintain that heuristic as one of two poles to the blight against the human ecology of our ethnonational, White/European, group systemic homeo/stasis – the other pole being those most adept at taking advantage – of the attendant susceptibility, disingenuousness among those treacherous among our kind, who’d take the pay-off or seek to advance themselves under the airs of “objectivity’ and liberalism; “openness” to others (who somehow pay); or, those who naively see that “objectivism” as the voice of purity and the road to redemption for original sin or whatever kind of guilt they think they need to be freed-from that their relative interests might otherwise call to consciousness – including a consciousness of the threat to their interests by that group who’ve made a religion of placing the ethnocentric management of their group systemic homeostasis, placing it above all others on earth …so practiced are they that they would resort, and have, to all manner of war – as their Mossad says, by deception – Manichean trickery in order to thwart upstart adversarial groups; they have practiced these strategies for ages – the YKW being responsible for the Christianity that would disarm us as a group (all non-Jews, finally, into the “undifferentiated Gentile other” as GW observes), to have us not recognize ourselves a group, to have us believe that we all are the same in the eyes of the poor, sacrificed, literally Jewish god that we are supposed to worship; laying down our arms even against the Muslims, whose Abrahamic religion they’ve also spawned, setting it to war against us where we might not yield to Abrahamism; setting up its imams as compradors in Asia as well, where the Asians may also see through their monotheistic, Abrahamic hoax; and want instead a religion of their people, serving their relative ethnonational interests.
I’m talking of course about the YKW – and here I want to go beyond my normal hypothesis that they are one of two major poles to the plight against our social systemic group maintenance as White/European peoples…. I want to identify, albeit in abstract form, the nine power and influence niches that they’ve come to wield hegemony within, with particular culmination following the 2008 subprime crisis and bail-out – among the largest ever thefts known to man.
This was the grand sweep of the boom/bust cycle. That is when they made “the left” as the enemy into a constant in their media and controlled opposition; that is when they devised the concept and got behind a re-branded right wing coalition centered on (((paleoconservatism))) called the “Alt-Right” and Zionist Trump with their clean break agenda …and they are trying assiduously to ingratiate themselves with the White right now – can you imagine that (((Frame Games))) is proposing to JF the “White pill” (silver lining) that White right wingers can join in with Jews to take advantage of the bust cycle and gentrify places like Detroit with them – we can live with blacks again! stir up their resentment, jealousy and hostility, put ourselves amidst their violence and sexual imposition on our treasure – What a White pill (for Jews like Frame Game, I guess)!
In this episode of JF Gariepy’s “Public Space”, called “What is to come”, Gariepy’s talk with (((Frame Games))) goes through a solemn tour of how White dispossession plays out in five examples, including, Detroit, Washington D.C., Rhodesia, Haiti and of course, Iran!
That’s right, not only does (((Frame Games))) propose that despite the catastrophic results in places of White dispossession such as Detroit, that there remains “a white pill” (cause for optimism), that is the possibility for Whites and Jews to take advantage of lowered property value to gentrify these places – of course, Whites and Jews can “gentrify” Iran too …. Donald Trump can put a Trump tower hotel there lol – The Trump Taj Mahal-Tehran!
He can have Madonna, (((Barbara Streisand))), Kanye West and (((Roseanne Barr))) as opening night entertainment….
As you should have heard me say many many times by now – but as the darlings of White advocacy continue to refuse to hear – the decades of anti White social coalition advocacy followed by the YKW cashing-in on the 2008 boom/bust, has created a situation with the YKW being on top of seven nine niches – whereof they want to cultivate an alliance with reactionary Whites into a rightist elitist alliance – paleocons permutated into an “alt right” to divert them into conceiving of the enemy as “the left” and its social unionization, its “social justice warriors” as the enemy, diverting attention to the stereotypes of the undergraduate students and teachers that they trained and backed in anti-White activism with misrepresentation of social philosophy through their long march through the academic institution to hegemony there.
Why, after all, would they want to encourage social group organization and unionization with an aim toward “social justice”, especially for people that they’ve screwed so horribly in order to get on top of these nine niches; and why would they want to call attention and have them raise consciousness of Jewish nepotism, exploitation, abuse and genocide even, from these perches in tandem with right wing/liberal traitors? They wouldn’t want-to; and now that the useful idiots of their “left coalitions” have hit upon the intersection where it calls attention to the nine power and influence niches wielded by Jewish interests to vast destruction of others, consciousness of which might threaten them with social unionization and coalition building, with social justice warriors indeed, arrayed against them to bring them down, to righteously secure reparation for some measure of compensation for their vast crime …that is when they want to promote the right, anti-social, objective “facts” for their “merit’ in coming into these power and influence niches; but if selling the Whites on that materialistic objectivism doesn’t work, their paleoconservatism prescribes cultural fellowship with them through Abrahamic worship of the King of the Jews.
They need to maintain the falsehoods that they’ve promulgated, distortions and misrepresentations of post modernity, incommensurate cultures, social constructionism, left unionization, hermeneutics, diversity, multiculturalism, marginals etc., all represent “the left” – a cooler sounding “synonym” for “liberalism” as something to be against ….diverting from the fact that a White left would be a union, and thus by definition the antithesis of liberalism, i.e., NOT open to non-Whites and those who’d facilitate scabbing of them, that the concept is perfectly conducive to ethno-nationalism and the national scale; and with that, most of all, it is conducive to accountability to the full groups of White/ ethnonationals, including to disincentive those marginals who would be inclined to facilitate scabbery, incentivizing rather, their loyalty; but especially it is conducive to a vigilance on accountability of our elites, or, our would-be elites, those in position to do the most damage by betraying our group interests; also a vigilance on those elites of non-White groups who are most capable of preying upon susceptibilities of those among us who would betray us; further, a vigilance against those non-Whites with the biopower to impose scabbing on us, the “lowly” kind of non-White that we are not supposed to be concerned about compared to the real “problem” – “leftism”. But “the” left that they and their right wing lackeys dutifully talk about, nerd themselves away from, is a universalized coalition of any facile groups that will ultimately serve only one union, YKW against the goyim firstly, viz., ordinary White people and their would-be White left union(s).
No, no, this is anti-nature, they say. (((Hayek))) told Margarete Thatcher to say that there is “no such thing as society”…. and some boomers cleaned-up, made good money in the disarray. With confirmation bias, these boomer types are the types to go along with and train those in the millennial internet bubbles that “the left is the problem, that objectivism, scientism and Hitler are the answer.”
They didn’t tell Margaret that it is not only a problem that the unions have a propensity to be all too powerful, and they need accountability of themselves, at their parameters with the rest of society’s interests, but that the problem was that these unions were not a union of the people, the White people, but rather in protection of obsolete businesses and business practices.
It is not that unions are wrong, leftism is “anti-nature” and that pure objectivism (whether its naive White variant or is disingenuous YKW prescription) and the invisible hand is correct, but rather that social organization is something that needs to be conducted with the true sophistication, but not overly complicated understanding, of White post modern philosophy.
Toward a promotion of that sophistication and understanding of what we are up against, lets take a more specific, though still abstract enlisting of the power and influence niches that the YKW have hegemony in – from whence they lord themselves over and confuse the ordinary goyim; and wield as a power source to bribe the disingenuous un-conscientious White of middling intelligence, or to flatter others, a JF Gariepy, or what-have-you.
For the sake of White left activism and union organization for social justice warring against the nine niches of elite YKW hegemony; to hold accountable those right wingers complicit with them, taking the deracinating pay-off in whatever form, usually objectivism or Christianity, and for our coalition partners, certain non-White unions we may ally with, it would be helpful to have an acronym ready-to-hand for easy recall to guide attention to the power centers we need to position ourselves against and eventually maneuver against.
By analogy, there is an acrynomal sentence which allows one to easily remember the nine planets:
My (Mercury)
Very (Venus)
Elegant (Earth)
Mother (Mars)
Just (Jupiter)
Served (Saturn)
Us (Uranus)
Nine (Neptune)
Pizzas (Pluto)
Another acrynomal sentence might be proposed to facilitate quick recall of the seven nine choke points of YKW power:
My Religiously Polite Mother Always Buys Courtley Assistance to Negotiate Good Organized Union Coalitions & Crime
My (Media – which has extended from times of Judeo-Christian bible (as Bowery observed) to Internet choke points and advanced interactive and mobile technology – a branch of imperialism , e.g., to be used in cyber warfare).
Religiously (Religion – The Abrahamic religions beginning with the monotheistic Judaism and “evangelizing” its monothestic, imperialistic Noahide law through Christianity and Islam).
In finance, the boom-bust cycle they’ve marshaled with “democratic socialist outreach” – like Fannie Mae (low interest, risky loans required to be given to blacks; while investment mediums of “guaranteed insurance of these loans” were sold on top of them!)/ followed by “objectivist austerity” through Reagan, Thatcher and following through the 2008 bail-out (the biggest theft in history), getting behind coalitions with right wing, recently “alt-right” propaganda against “the left” – which might otherwise ensconce consciousness to see them in their power niches, and provide for activism against them, to marshal social organizational power to do something about their niche occupation and its abuse.
Related Story: Orthodox Jewish boys go secular, reap compound fortune in another Jewish tradition – loan sharking.
Always (Academics: as (((Frame Games))) has acknowledged and my experience bears-out, the YKW are always determined to have hegemony in academics, since that’s where top-down power and influence is established; as demonstrated through their nepotistic, unmerited hegemony at Harvard and other Ivy league colleges. The Ivy league colleges are the gate way to the professions, political and public influence. The big academic business of selling talk to undergraduates is a way to connect empathically with youthful anxieties and aspirations, to direct them by selling them on talk that serves YKW interests, creating phony “movements” and ‘rebellions”, “social justice activism” (if only against Whites) that they can be a part of…
Buys (Business, international and domestic – in this part of the cycle, securing US real estate with Russian (((mafia))) money bailing out Trump’s domestic assets and helping him to advance to the presidency. US domestic (((business))) has emerged as a “concern” to bolster (((conservative))) backing of Trump in order to garner bible belt, evangelical sympathy for the Zionist agenda and its operation clean break implementation in Iran) … Plenty of other shady (((business))), ranging from H1b Visas, cheap business loans for Indians to buy-up convenience stores and motels, in order to gain Indian connection and cooperation …then there is the off-shore money laundering schemes through shell companies revealed in the Panama Papers, etc.
Related Story: The Sackler Family, Pushers of Opioids, profiteers on created addiction in vulnerable peoples.
Related story: 3 of Them Defraud London Olympics Investors of £80 million.
Courtly Assistance (Courts and Attorneys – to influence law and its implementation, as in the example of “Brown vs.Board of Education”, “Disparate Impact”, the “Civil Rights Act”, the “Rumford Fair Housing Act”). Even Trump had his kosher legal mentorship and advocacy against “the” left, in the person of attorney Roy Cohn.
So where do NGO’s – like The Jewish Community Relationship Council – and Unions (including make shift “unions”/ and coalitions thereof) – fit in? hmmm …we’re going to have to add that in; should have long ago:
Negotiate Good Organized (NG0’s)
Union Coalitions (Social group organizations – literal or make shift unions and coalitions thereof – liberal social groups, liberal in the sense of denying and scabbing White social unionization. These are social communitarian groups primarily devised by Jewish interests in coalition building of anti-White organization).
Unions, especially of the internationalist labor kind…
..but also organized crime.
In this episode of JF Gariepy’s “Public Space”, referenced in the main post, he talks with (((Frame Games))) who goes through a solemn tour of how White dispossession plays out in five examples, including, Detroit, Washington D.C., Rhodesia, Haiti and of course, Iran!
Now then, as adumbrated above, (((Frame Games))) proposes that despite these catastrophic results to the areas of White dispossession, there remains “a white pill” (cause for optimism), that is the possibility for Whites and Jews can take advantage of lowered property value to gentrify these places – of course, Whites and Jews can “gentrify” Iran too …. Donald Trump can put a Trump tower hotel there lol – The Trump Taj Mahal-Tehran!
He can have Madonna, (((Barbara Streisand))), Kanye West and (((Roseanne Barr))) as opening night entertainment….
It is becoming clear that the acrynomal phrase of niche power points occupied by YKW has to be extended, or somehow understood to extend “Media” into IT, Internet and Military Technology; and “Money” and “Business” into not only “NGOs” and “Unions” but also Corporations (and their relation to politics) in a web with the Military Industrial Complex.
…
IHRA definition of anti-Semitism
(((Frame Games))) disclosing: IHRA’s efforts to impose a universal definition of anti-Semitism
Strategy for imposing a universally criminalizing definition of anti-Semitism:
Posted by Law & Courts on Wed, 17 Oct 2018 08:53 | #
Toronto Superior Court throws-out Faith Goldy Campaign law-suit
Posted by 5 of 10 wealthiest Americans are YKW on Wed, 17 Oct 2018 17:37 | #
Realist Report, “5 of the 10 Wealthiest Americans Are Jewish”, 6 Oct 2018:
According to the organized Jewish community and professional Jewish ethnic activists, anyone claiming that Jews are over-represented in key aspects of American political, cultural, and economic life are “irrational, paranoid, hateful, anti-Semitic conspiracy theorists.”
Making basic, factual, and easily verifiable statements about the reality of Jewish power and influence in America – pointing out their domination and control of the mainstream mass news media, Hollywood and entertainment industry, for example, or their influence in the Federal Reserve banking system, Wall Street, and corporate America – is considered “anti-Semitic” and “hateful,” according to Jews, despite how obvious it all is.
Here we have even more proof of the total Jewish domination of our society: according to a recent report published by The Times of Israel, 5 of the top 10 wealthiest individuals in America are Jewish.
That means that 50% of the richest people in the United States are ethnically Jewish, despite Jews representing less than 5% of the total U.S. population.
Think about that for a moment. And think about why we are prevented from openly and honestly discussing these basic facts, despite them being reported in mainstream publications, including explicitly Jewish publications like The Times of Israel.
Jews Wealthiest Americans
Forbes published its 2018 roster of America’s wealthiest this week, and five members of the tribe made the top 10 list.
Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg leads the Jewish pack at number 4, with a net worth of $61 billion. He is followed by software giant Oracle’s Larry Ellison at #5 with $58.4b and Google co-founder Larry Page at #6 with $53.8b.
Fellow co-founder Sergey Brin falls a bit behind with $52.4b, leaving him at #9. Finally, former New York mayor Michael Bloomberg closes out the top 10 with a respectable $51.8b. […]
The simple fact of the matter is that Jews do in fact largely run our country.
They own and control the mass media, allowing them to essentially control the narrative, especially on key issues that are central to their insidious international agenda to subvert and destroy traditional Western civilization. They own and control our banking system and much of corporate America. They own and control some of the top internet giants, including top social media companies like Facebook. They play a huge role in American politics, and essentially control the U.S. Congress and executive branch, and thus American foreign and domestic policy.
And it’s easy to demonstrate all of this. It’s not some crazy “conspiracy theory” – it’s openly reported and documented, often by explicitly Jewish media outlets. We’re just not allowed to honestly discuss this reality and what it means for our nation and world – that would be “anti-Semitic,” after all.
Posted by mancinblack on Wed, 17 Oct 2018 18:41 | #
No shit Sherlock moments like “5 Jews make Forbes list” are the reason why I read the Jewish and in particular, the Israeli press. For example, Times of Israel reporters did a great job in exposing a derivative scam operating out of Israel, which had cost European investors billions and didn’t stop hammering home the immorality of the financiers after the practice was banned in Israel. They kept the pressure on until those responsible were shut down completely. With that in mind, here’s the American Jewish take on affirmative action, particularly when it comes to university admissions…
Not being American, I can’t comment on it but it may be of interest to those who are.
BLM Supporter Tells Whites Eating At A Taqueria That They Are NOT WELCOME In NYC – Whose City Is it? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jB9Tkaj-T04
A classic and prescient episode of Adrean Arlott’s “Compulsory Diversity News”
Obamas and Rumors of Obamas
http://www.dnanations.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/04/CDN_20081107.mp3
(((Frame Games): Spilling Beans:
The Perplexing Case of Starbucks Pt III w Frame Games, TPS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h5XCJAZwIhE
The Perplexing Case of Starbucks Pt II w Frame Game TPS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vPFpVLGnn0g
The Perplexing Case of Starbucks w Frame Game, TPS #55
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NpV4ebZVqwI
The Story They Burned Pt II w Frame Games, TPS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1xXEH1p0Rpg
The Story They Burned w Frame Games, TPS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1pwVhmaUL6c
What To Do Next w Frame Game, TPS #46
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jTAjdeiAnrc
JF A Web of Lies w Frame Game, TPS #39
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_eE_1mnm17k
What’s to Come w Frame Game TPS #31
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kOgPrN1Z6BU
JF Behind The Curtain w Frame Game TPS #24
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ecyhPGdfh60
JF The End of White Civilization w Frame Games, TPS #12
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m9O3SQzc0UU
Frame Game Radio – Outlawing Words and Symbols
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WSFMrlhVcW8
Frame Game Radio – Livestream The Diversity Tourist
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MzMxrTEbOLM