In the decades following World War II, the discourse parameters of controlled opposition purporting to be conservative of White interests through American power and patriotism have been set by two poles – one pole of controlled opposition, NeoConservatism, has become quite well known to Whites considering themselves to have rebelled to a dissident position on behalf of their interests
The other pole, PaleoConservatism, has been scarcely understood for the controlled opposition that it is. However, PaleoConservatism remains the fundamental rubric under which the Dissident Right successors of the now defunct Alternative Right (having served its basic function, to undo the Iran Deal through Donald Trump) continue to function – in the controlled advocacy of Whites and White Nationalism in opposition to the “politically correct” liberalization of White national borders and group boundaries. In fact, PaleoConservatism is a more insidious, sneaky form of controlled opposition.
Indeed, none other than Professor Kevin MacDonald has claimed that PaleoConservatism is not Jewish; when in fact, it is Jewish, both in origin and in purpose – as controlled opposition.
PaleoConservatism is controlled opposition and a more cunning, insidious controlled opposition – because of that, ultimately even more destructive to Whites than NeoConservatism as it seeps in more thoroughly to work against potential means of resistance.
Recognizing that forms of leftist advocacy heretofore backed by Jewish interests were getting out of control against them and that new forms of leftism (particularly, ethnonationalist) might effectively emerge beyond and against Jewish control, that there would be a backlash against the obvious destruction of NeoConservatism and Frankfurt School political correctness, in addition to the intersectional confrontation of its coalitions as they came into conflict with Jewish power and influence; and finally, with the broader White populace in particular becoming more aware than ever of the malign effects of Jewish power and influence as it ascended to greater hegemony than ever with the 2008 subprime crisis bail-out, and potentially organizing against it with a concept of White left ethnonationalism, the PaleoConservative, Paul Gottfried of marked concern, felt the need to control this potential – he saw the need for controlled opposition and voiced inauguration of an “Alternative Right.” In fact, the Alt-Right was basically a got-up version of PaleoConservatism, a catch-all tentosphere of reactionary, anti-social and stigmatic positions that added a few tents to accommodate these reactionaries to be controlled along lines of the original PaleoConservative tent; and to infuse it with otherwise disaffected youth, it added hard edged irreverence to appeal to their youthful rebellion – memes cunningly inserted by this marketing campaign against a characterology of “the left” as it intersected, ran contra to Jewish hegemony and its complicit right wingers (albeit, sometimes unwittingly complicit) to give it street cred and the look of authentic rebellion against political correctness.
For the marketing of this project, Spencer was taken under the umbrella, or big tent, as it were, of the Regnery circus, sponsoring a tentosphere of disaffected right wing reactionaries who were an audience for the long time right wing publisher, Regnery; catering to its largely Germanic audience with Germanophilia bordering on Nazism but strangely also catering to right wing Jews.
The failure of Richard Spencer and the Alt-Right project is well known, but the very real concerns of its audience continue, of course, as does their altercasting within the controlled oppositional framework of PaleoConservativatism.
Cultural Marxism and NeoConservatism vs. PaeloConservatism as Cultural Controlled Opposition.
A leading exponent of PaleoConservatism since the demise of The Alt-Right rebranding and the fall of Richard Spencer, has been Nick Fuentes.
Controlled opposition will place unwitting assets like Fuentes, intelligent but not intelligent enough to be fully unaware that they are functioning under controlled opposition or able to function outside of it if they might be aware. They typically come across as your best asset, providing just enough red meat to gain credibility as true opposition. Nevertheless, if you recognize it for what it is and keep it on the radar screen as such, not getting caught up, controlled opposition can have its utility as they are often funded to provide valuable resource, typically enlisting intelligent people and allowing them fine and clear articulation of some important information for WN. As in the instance when Nick Fuentes nicely articulates Israeli Operation Clean Break, a.k.a., “Project for a New America Century.”
Meanwhile, U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman, (((Alan Greenspan))), was applying (((the magic hand))) of conservative American, anti-communist economics, (((Randian “objectivism” – read the red cape, really subjectivism))) and (((Austrian School Economics and Libertarianism))) to fulfill the culmination of the centuries old cycle of horizontal transmission, in which the wealth of a nation magically accrues to Jewish power and interests – as it did with the 2008 bail out.
This NeoConservative and Austrian School controlled opposition ran rough shod over true conservatism through American Federal Reserve Chairman, Alan Greenspan to the 2008 financial crisis; which, again, was the point where Jewish power and interests saw need for a marketing campaign to be inaugurated against “The Left” with a renewed PaleoConservative Right.
Although Fuentes’ PaleoConservatism is not what most people consider to be classic controlled opposition, make no mistake. While we are tossing around the word “culture” of late, adding “cultural capitalism” and “cultural nationalism” on the radar screen with cultural Marxism, it can be said quite accurately that Paleoconservatism is a “cultural controlled opposition”….a bit softer and more flexible perhaps than classic, but undoubtedly allowing the enemies of European peoples to act on key points and exacting a cost – as in the instance of Nick being implicated as a figurehead in the Capitol “insurrection” against Biden’s dubious election to the The US Presidency.
Before going more into the historical pattern of the PaleoCon and NeoCon Controlled opposition, lets come up to date as to where Richard Spencer is now at in this controlled opposition; as he apparently wants to remain public, yet now must function with greater compromise than ever to the parameters of controlled opposition given the pressure he is under from the law and media.
Richard is free to follow his elitist predilections, prance around aloof from the dregs of White Nationalism and still be free to have a voice provided he says things which the Noahide lawyers want him to say – he must denounce White Nationalism and describe it as futile; and as a conciliatory gesture to the PaleoCons whom he failed, he must say that Jesus Christ walked in the flesh; even though in all likelihood, he knows that never happened; but that yoking to Noahide law is a crucial part of the PaleoCon bargain that he is under if he is to be free to pursue his elitist predilections, imperialism, supremacism, which fit better under the rubric of NeoConservative Controlled opposition. And that’s the point, he is going to appear to exonerate himself of WN association under a kind of NeoCon controlled opposition, all Nietzschean and Faustian and all.
Richard Spencer (5:45): We could get into an argument as to whether or not Jesus Christ existed. I generally think that he did exist, he was a real person. …and, of course, became parabolic and mythic in his death.”
What we know of what he was saying.. he was a doomsayer …. literally the end was coming tomorrow, maybe …we are living in end, this doomsday is coming and that was a very important part of his message… obviously the end did not come… when that prophesy failed Christianity became the words and the became the believers much more so than just him … and I think something similar is happening, going to happen with Q.”
Lucius (18:45): “Very recently you wrote a tweet thread on uh, nationalism, where you referred to it as a shit magnet essentially. I think that is entirely accurate.
I enjoy as much as anyone else intellectual exercises, theorizing, philosophizing, etc., but all that is valueless if it can’t be grounded in reality.
It is up to us who have the vision to be honest with people and tell hard truths – like this: White Nationalism was always dead on arrival. What do you think?”
Richard Spencer: “Yes.” I agree. “
Lucius: “I thought you would”
Spencer: I mean …as a Nietzschean … you could say that we have to face the fact that White Nationalism as its been constituted, kind of always has been dead on arrival. …and I think it’s always told itself lies. ..and I think there’s a challenge for us to move beyond this kind of thing (let’s out a great sigh, looks despairing).
Lucius: “I agree … a lot of it does become a shit magnet [Editorial question: who is throwing the shit? Jews and their right wing/liberal minions perhaps?] ..because of the reactionary thought process that’s involved in it. It’s always like, oh, this person said this thing, let’s all explode and react to it in childish ways and never actually develop something. You could say like a White Nationalist, one of the things they’re for is a White country, but there’s no principles.”
Spencer: “Yeah, we had a White country and look how it turned out.”
Lucius: “You made an old expression popular again when you said, ‘become who you are’ – that’s always stuck with me and I think becoming who you are involves like, accepting our history, including the Enlightenment, The French Revolution. …you know, that’s all part of our story: liberalism. So, we can’t just react to our forefathers, we have to progress from them”
Spencer: “Right.” “Yes”… “I mean, while recognizing serious limitations, uh, in ourselves and not just treating the west as some museum that we want to maintain. Which is also a very bad tendency – the Paleo tendency, you could say.
We have to understand where nihilism is coming from and its not all a matter of some mean, lying Jews out there who tricked us.
..even if you want to accept that fact, the idea that we’re so easily tricked is rather disconcerting…. you know, the con man needs a mark and the mark needs a con man (?) much like cattle needs a cowboy (?) and a cowboy needs cattle.”
… a lot of these things amounted to a desire to overcome something and I think they could lead to some bad places and I think they have led to nihilism in our sense; but I think we can admire at least the will to overcome; and not retreat to some earlier thing that we already overcame.”
At this point Spencer emphasizes (over emphasizes) the necessity of modernist side of post modernity, its scientific rationality to overcome lame traditions and “the current, “nihilistic order” and not retreat to something that we’ve already overcome, which is the typical conservative viewpoint.”
Lucius: “One of the books that I’ve recommended to you in the Warhammer 40k series …it’s not called a religion, but its basically a religion of reason.
..as a way to cut through the darkness and get beyond expired ideals.”
Spencer (52:25): ..its just another White Nationalist fantasy, that it’s all going to collapse and it’s not going to happen and I probably don’t want that to happen either. …Planet of the Apes not withstanding.”
….
Now, why would Spencer be saying this, going in the direction of the modernist side of post modernity without White ethnoNationalism? Is it because he is an elitist fuck head taking a pay off or at very least trying to stay out of further trouble? Probably yes.
Before we get lost further in the weeds of current events and figures, the more ephemeral matters of politics, whether Donald Trump’s PaleoCon administration being ousted (to be discarded, his purpose – to undo the Iran Deal – having been served to the powers that be, wink), ousted by maneuvers such as Zuckerberg’s sponsoring of Democrat voter registration, i.e., of inner city blacks; or the smoke of Richard Spencer’s latest effort to not be sullied by his PaleoCon forebears, or Nick Fuentes latest ‘no true Scotsmanning’of PaleoConservatism, or getting winded by bag of books known as Paul Gottfried, closer to the root of the PaleCon matter (in fact, having coined the term) though he is, lets look and make sure to keep sight on the general parameters of controlled opposition, structured with NeoConservatives and their impresarios, Leo Strauss and Irving Kristol on one side and PaleoConservativism, its impresario, Frank Meyer, on the other side.
Long story short, Frank Meyer was another one of these Jewish Marxists who purported see the light, converting to American patriotism. He seized upon its salient characteristic aspects that would serve Jewish interests to concoct an agenda that he called “fusionism.”
Basically, he would promote an ideological fusion of the Enlightenment’s universalism to be found written into the U.S. Constitution, which left Whites vulnerable as group organization became veritably anti-American, and especially as (((weaponized))) in “civil-individual-rights” which actually advocated non-White groups, blacks especially, and prohibited White classificatory freedom from association (as “racism”). In even greater departure from NeoConservatism, this American patriotism would be fused with a stronger advocacy of America’s domestic cultural underpinnings in Judeo-Christianity – thus partaking of the greatest controlled opposition of all: Christianity, to configure Whites under Noahide jurisdiction.
Between Enlightenment universalism and its individual civil rights as imbued by the U.S. Constitution at the expense of group organization and conservation (at the expense of White organization, anyway), and Judeo-Christian universalism – all non-Jews are to be a blended liberal Gentile mass, one in Christ; thus, what is being “conserved” in PaleoConservatism is liberalism – viz., liberalization of White borders and boundaries; with the overbearing weight and fear of their very moral order enforce.
Ronald Reagan was a disciple of Frank Meyer and gained the United States Presidency with the help of Meyer’s mentorship. This effectively installed Reagan as false conservatism to placate White reaction in controlled opposition. At the same time, U.K. (((tribesman))) succeeded in installing Thatcher as false opposition to Political Correct “Leftism” through her adherence to the (((Austrian school))) of Hayek, von Mises and the kindred like of Ayn Rand.
The libertarian strain (an offshoot controlled opposition, more individualism pitted against the left and its Neo and PaleoCon controlled opposition) that inhabited Thatcher was in sync enough with PaleoConservatism by her own Judeo-Christianity to thus carry the two great western nations forward in placation of true conservatism; to where the NeoCon Agenda was ready to take hold through the first George Bush, Clinton and Tony Blair years – as we westerners had taken it long enough! We’d patiently endured until the Soviet Union fell, now it was really time to serve Jewish, Israeli interests since their first attempt at world domination through the Soviet Union hadn’t worked out for them. … some pay off to White Right wing sell outs and added license to White liberals in the offing would help ease the way for the NeoConservative take-over.
With the growing power of female gate keepers to empower liberal leaders in their (short term) interests as they could drive harder bargains with the greater competition of open borders and group boundaries, the NeoCons prepared the way for take over in the background of Clinton and Blair as their philosophy, nihilistic of all non-Jewish nationalism, reached a crescendo of Political Correctness and hyperbolic liberalism with no effective means to answer back, particularly in these days prior to the internet.
The puerile and liberal female gate-keepers that rose to greater power than ever within the disorder of modernity’s rupture of classificatory bounds, their atavistic drive to incite genetic competition worse than ever, more pandered-to than ever, facilitated putting into power two of the biggest scumbags ever as heads of state in The U.S. and Great Britain.
His General for the campaign (((Wesley Clark))), said:
…
NeoConservative Fathers and Sons
It is not conservatism, but rather the pretense through ultra-pragmatic and facile utilization of American exceptionalism and twisting of US Constitutional rules for its ends, nihilistically against anything conservative other than Israel and Jewish interests; otherwise, it’s ongoing revolution.
NeoConservatism is basically an ultra facile pragmatism, beginning with the deception of its name, “conservatism” where in fact it is primarily concerned with the foreign affairs of geopolitics, viz., seeking to use American military might and whatever else might be necessary under the rubric of nihilism to expand Israeli come Jewish interests, placating right wingers with some share in the spoils of its warring, imperialist, expansionary reach.
It’s primary psychology as controlled opposition is to instill a sense of confidence in America by deployment of military might and economic power, thus “conserving” America’s exceptional position as the supposed beacon of democratic liberalism (imposer of Abrahamic yoke).
It is only concerned for unionizations and coalitions thereof that it can control and use to scab the national and ethnonational bounds of others.
As Bill Kristol has made clear, it is opposed to ethnonationalism (for Whites); interestingly, Kristol freaks out if you notice the fact that Jews are not White; and he freaks out if Israel comes under critical scrutiny; hardly the conservatism that George Washington had in mind in his farewell speech at Fraunce’s Tavern, declaring America’s need to avoid foreign entanglements. But hey, we “conservatives” can use US power to bomb and kill people who disagree with interference.
Obamas and Rumors of Obamas
Compulsory Diversity News, Adrean Arlott:
The Obama administration, furthering the NeoCon agenda
“The greatest danger of all is to allow new walls to divide us from one another. The walls between old allies on either side of the Atlantic cannot stand. The walls between the countries with the most and those with the least cannot stand. The walls between races and tribes, natives and immigrants, Christians and Muslims and Jews, cannot stand. These now are the walls we must tear down!”
Gaddafi: “You idiots, I had warned you!”
…
Ukraine, looking every bit like another phase of Operation Clean Break.
If Jewish men are impregnating Ukrainian women and the children don’t have the same Israeli status as they might if their mothers were Jewish, where better to go than Ukraine to gain a foothold in its strategic geopolitical position, valuable farmland and other resource?
Controlled (and Controlling) Opposition Is Not Necessarily Controlling and Controlled In The Way That People Think It Is.
Coming by top down prescription from their seven to ten elite niches or from the bottom up, less consciously, more of their biological patterns, the YKW’s controlled opposition works through the holes, rational blindness to social accountability as created by the objectivism underpinning right wing/liberal world views.
Trump’s ousting created some temporary unclarity as to how the controlled opposition would be playing-out through its useful goyim idiots, but the recent Spencer interview has clarified things .
Before discussing particulars and generality of controlled opposition, it is necessary to discuss how it works in the reality of praxis; i.e., Jewry’s control of opposition, altercasting right wing and “third positionist” identity as it were, isn’t exactly like a puppet master pulling strings, though it is largely deliberate – it isn’t a plan without options, but rather a bit more like casuistry, taking advantage of the best opportunities and options (while the option parameters are themselves articulated by them in the main) in circumstance and presented by them to the public as such, heads we win, tails you lose; at the same time, even those Jews who promote controlled opposition are not necessarily fully conscious ot if – it can be quite simply a matter of their biology to effect a kind of damage control which nevertheless accrues to their interests by way of controlled opposition.
Indeed, one can say that anyone in opposition to the liberal elitist control which runs rough shod over our systemic borders and bounds is controlled to some extent at this point: but by its actual administrators, controlled opposition at one extreme is an expression of those controlling the logics of meaning and action (again, whether largely calculating or largely intuitive); and it runs through a gamut of awareness (or not) from there; from right wingers and liberals disingenuously, cynically taking the payoff and incentives or naively (less consciously) for their individual participation in a group rubric in controlled opposition (such as Christianity); thus “controlled” in destruction of our would-be systemic homeostasis.
Though Paul Gottfried and Richard Spencer aren’t fully conscious that they are controlling and controlled opposition, operating through biological motives, material incentives and disincentives, this lack of self reflection only makes them more convincing of themselves.
Of course the key concern of controlled opposition since 2008 is to orchestrate public reaction intersecting against YKW elite niche power (blocking retribution from among their internationalist coalition and White ethnonationalism both), as a greater YKW hegemony than ever called attention to itself as a key problem, the key instigator in liberalization of our borders and bounds –
thus, while YKW power and influence had not only gained more hegemony than ever, they needed to control ‘leftist’ opposition, its populist appeal to compassion and broad social justice for a group, not just elites. As the broad group might gain power against their hegemony through unionization and coalition building, this potential needed to be quashed and re-directed in favor of trumped-up stories appealing to right wingers and liberals, casting whatever success they might have as coming through sheer “objective facts,” a matter of personal merit scarcely indebted to their social group, little in need of social accountability – nor the YKW, of course.
At the same time a marketing campaign was unleashed depicting a characterology of “the left” as this thing that did not deal with reality, facts, nature, science and so on. They would cite the insane, anti-White PC Cultural Marxists that their people generated in academia as representatives of “The Left” – “Social Justice Warriors” seeking “Equality” became terms of derision hung on them in a world that knows know equality and should not care because the Jews are on top for pure objective reasons of merit, just as the right wing logics of meaning and action that they altercast will script; just as (((Steve Sailer’s))) red cape of “Human Biodiversity” as a matter of I.Q., convenient to the Ashkenazi, would have it.
The likes of Mike Enoch Peinovich were equipped with a portfolio of memes to mock and combat Political Correctness and “The Left”, these “Lefties”, “Social Justice Warriors”, and he was encouraged to be as irreverent and outrageous as need be in order to gain credibility as leadership in opposition to Jewish power and influence: mock the holocaust, name your show the “Daily Shoah”, make gas chamber jokes, express reverence for Hitler, be as anti-Semitic as need be in order to gain control of the opposition.
But not just the more extreme reactionaries, the broader populace had to brought under control as well, assimilating the Alt-Right reaction but not quite as extreme so as not to put off the “normies” in this campaign. They would thus have an “Alt-lite.”
For that end, Steve Bannon had Breitbart assimilate the Alt-Right, enlisting Milo et al. to gain further control of it.
Alt-Right Marketing Memes Galore
Especially through the portfolio provided Mike Enoch Peinovich and TRS, Weev and Anglin at Daily Stormer as they dipped into 4-Chan’s threads, memes were spread of red pills, blue pills, black pills, white pills, social justice warriors, cuckservatives, “normies” who wouldn’t understand the truth and goodness of Hitler and Nazism, therefore require “Optics Cucking” to be discreet with overt displays of Nazism as they wouldn’t understand and appreciate overt displays of Nazism and its symbolism; nevertheless, as this Alt-Right campaign is pushing beyond, a PaleoConservatism2.0, it must move the Overton window among “the red pilled (awakened).”
And it did that until it completed its purpose of getting Trump elected so that he could undo the Iran Deal for Israel. After that, controlled opposition imploded the Alt-Right, Richard Spencer and anyone else who got wrapped up in this false oppositon come Mike Enoch’s prompt to use the Hitler Salute for Richard Spencer when he “Hailed” Trump’s victory! to the Alt-Right’s final demise in the trap known as “Unite the Right” Charlottesville, in which the thing that the Alt-Right and Richard Spencer had best going for them, their ability to avoid being pinned down centrally as an easily targeted movement, was brought together as a target and brought down.
"The Alt Right, White Nationalism, it's losers" - Steve Bannon
“To me,” Bannon said, “the economic war with China is everything.” … “Ethno-nationalism—it’s losers. It’s a fringe element. I think the media plays it up too much, and we gotta help crush it, you know, uh, help crush it more.” …“These guys are a collection of clowns,” he added.
The question of whether the phone call was on or off the record never came up. This is also puzzling, since Steve Bannon is not exactly Bambi when it comes to dealing with the press. He’s probably the most media-savvy person in America. I asked Bannon about the connection between his program of economic nationalism and the ugly white nationalism epitomized by the racist violence in Charlottesville and Trump’s reluctance to condemn it. Bannon, after all, was the architect of the strategy of using Breitbart to heat up white nationalism and then rely on the radical right as Trump’s base.
He dismissed the far right as irrelevant and sidestepped his own role in cultivating it: “Ethno-nationalism—it’s losers. It’s a fringe element. I think the media plays it up too much, and we gotta help crush it, you know, uh, help crush it more.”
“These guys are a collection of clowns,” he added.
From his lips to Trump’s ear. “The Democrats,” he said, “the longer they talk about identity politics, I got ’em. I want them to talk about racism every day. If the left is focused on race and identity, and we go with economic nationalism, we can crush the Democrats.”
The Alt-Right and right wingers generally suggested that Trump was not politics as usual, his money (not bailed out by Russian Jews, or anything) made him independent of politics as usual. He was not part of the “swamp.”
They’d try to say that Jews don’t want Trump to be president, despite all obvious evidence: Ye PaleoCons come Alt-Righters, must see how Jews don’t want Trump to be President, defy them!
Adelson also represented a second tier of Jewish money concerned not only about Israel but also about their real estate and other domestic American interests being affected by the intersection of political correctness and immigration intended to work against their enemies. Thus, they were compelled to share some concern and throw some bones to this authentic White concern. Hispanics are notoriously indifferent to stories of Jewish persecution; while Muslim immigration (a big problem in Europe) is going to be outright hostile. Blacks tent to see Jews as the Whitest and most obnoxious of White supremacists.
Trump Cabinet member, Steven Miller, is said to have been influenced by “Camp of the Saints”.
Largely the same old dog whistling to the White base by the Republicans, perhaps a slightly bigger dog whistle and dog bone thrown this time in a deal to get that Iran Deal undone, but heavily controlled opposition just the same, hardly a draining of the swamp
Right wingers who gain personally through complicitness with YKW elitism running rough shod over accountability to White group interests in particular, are pandered to in the ramped up controlled opposition (presently called “dissident right”) marketing campaign against “the left.”
Pandering and pandered-to at the objectivist basis of their world view, adding a still very successful public relations campaign (even after the demise of the Alt-Right) in polemic against a characterology of “The Left” as The enemy, “The” problem: “the left” does not provide working hypotheses, sufficiently liberated from mere facticity in order to operate in authentic sovereignty, sufficient breadth of functional autonomy and perspective, yet delimited and accountable, thus self corrective and having compassion for those temporarily marginalized as a part in historical social capital, but is rather completely divorced from nature and truth, with only one kind of left at that, anti-White. There cannot be a White Left Ethnonationalism which measures objective truth inquiries for their utility against calibrative working hypotheses of relative group interests, accountable to unionized delimitation thereof, though they cannot explain why that must be.
With the purpose of diverting Whites from organizing, unionizing – facilitating accountability and systemic correctability, thus homeostasis and autonomy, structuring concern and compassion to our own, thus building popular support for our social justice and power, along with coalitions with others for our reasonable basis as we might under a concept of White Left Ethnonationalism, the first requirement of casuistry in the intersectional confrontation of the 2008 super hegemony was a marketing campaign shifting from NeoConservative controlled opposition to Paul Gottfried and useful idiot Richard Spencer’s re-tooling of PaleoConservatism for a 2.0 – the Alt-Right, with a bigger tent, a tentosphere of tents appealing especially to a reactionary youth market, chasing the red capes of Cultural Marxism and susceptible to be marshaled into sheer reaction, juxtaposed to straight Marxist unionization building, nixing altogether the concept of unionization as something for the working class of the world, not for White ethnonationals, nixing unionization and the coalition building it facilitates in favor “objectivity”, “truth” and “science.” …whereas unionization of the Ethnonation as opposed to the working class, let alone international working class is supposedly impossible under the auspices of unionization?
With objectivism as opposed to unionizing of relative interests as White ethnonationalists, social accountability truncated, suffering Whites in reaction gobbled up irreverence to the sacred cows of Political Correctness in a big tentosphere which allowed particular tents for anyone holding right wing views stigmatic and anti social enough to ensure that they are controlled, i.e., would never succeed ultimately as a popular movement in social systemic homeostasis of Whites.
They were given a master lock and key for access to the tentosphere, with confounding oxymoronic code: leftism = liberalism. When in fact, the underpinning of leftism is unionization, which is the opposite of liberalism as it precludes the border and boundary opening of liberalism while conserving what is within the union. True, the Marxist internationalist and Cultural Marxist anti White Left is about liberalizing White group bounds and White National borders, but it is not leftism for Whites – not THE LEFT, it is not our left, not our unionization, let alone an integrative unionization of our genus (race) and species (nations), as opposed to class division amongst.
Again, this controlled opposition doesn’t necessarily operate fully consciously through the controlling; and obviously does not function fully consciously through unwitting traitors or the controlled per se. Right wingers in their conspiracy theorizing have a tendency to look at controlling oppositionists more like puppeteers than they are when in fact they often act more opportunistically, in casuistry, making and taking the best available opportunity, pandering to reactionaries and hedging in damage control where they have it good.
And their victims are not necessarily controlled as puppets on strings, but controlled well enough, incentivized as right wingers by payoffs, as liberals by license and licentiousness, coddled in heady exhilaration of “innocence”, in the pseudo warrant of pure objectivity free of social accountability, or frightened to stay within fixed options – within discourse parameters and logics of meaning and action that preclude the true conservatism, conservationism that unionization facilitates by excluding those whoe are not members and conserving those are members (whether they are best or not by universal standards beyond the union), facilitating accountability to and correctivity of membership – as Left Ethnonationalism could do.
And while this ethnonationalist unionization is precluded, with Whites successfully maneuvered into identifying with right wing or third positionist non accountability, they are presented with options under civic nationalist, come weaponized anti-racist anti- White control; either way the anti-Whites win, whether Hillary Clinton or Donald Trump, Donald Trump or Joe Biden; while they preferred Trump to Hillary in 2016 and preferred Biden to Trump in 2020 as a matter of casuistry.
Of course, the Left Ethnonationalism that would structure ethnonationalist unionization and coalition building against this elitist hegemony which liberalizes our borders and bounds to our oblivion, the Left ethnonationalist unionization that we are focused on in true opposition to this oppression and destruction, as opposed to the red cape “The Left” that our people are duped into chasing against our interests, is White Left Ethnonationalism – not only because we are White but because White is the genus, the race, the social (i.e., left) unionization of which the “anti-racism” of our adversaries, the policy and activism of YKW, is intent on rendering utterly disempowered.
Thus, another detail to clarify, i.e., this matter of what White Nationalism is (and is not). It is not something unrealistic, as unionization is eminently practical, requires no great emotional or psychological, political nor geographical migration to participate, it is not dead on arrival for anti-social stigma, it IS ethnonationalist and anti-supremacist as distinguished from the natural fallacy and other ideology of Nazism which considers itself exceptional, beyond praxis.
By contrast, for our adversaries and their controlled opposition it is crucial to muddle, by disingenuous rhetoric and rule implementation (e.g., as we said, with the oxymoron that the enemy is “the left” and the left and leftist organization is liberalism” or by suggesting conservatism is Christian universalism, the golden rule of universal self sacrifice), or to allow White Ethnonationalism’s true form to be muddied, stigmatized in misdirection (as we’ve discussed, e.g., into Nazi imperialism, supremacism and genocidal corollary).
In their controlled opposition they red cape “the left” as internationalist and anti-White only and also seek to mystify and misrepresent what is meant by White, specifically White Nationalism.
White is simply the practical tag for the genus of the European race; practical as a tag because it would be otherwise confusing to refer to us as European when we are born and citizens of nations outside of Europe. But every nation in Europe (and adjacently of Russians), is a White Nation. And White is all the more important a practical tag to defend as it is indeed our genus of our people, wherever we are, that is under attack by anti-racism.
Richard Spencer’s recent podcast provides more bread crumb trail to this concern of controlled opposition. He goes along with (((Kyle Rowland)))’s proposition that White is a preposterous category and void of participatory incentive, ignoring the fact that all European nationalism is White nationalism and White nationalism is the motivating organization of European peoples for national purpose against the anti-racist (i.e., prohibition of White/European genus and species group classification and discrimination accordingly) prohibition of our oppressors; E. Michael Jones makes a similar argument against “White” as a category based on the controlled opposition of Christianity (universal convertability of souls and and ethnicity as more a tag of parish shepherding) in which he is based; and Jonathan Pohl also argues against White Nationalism as a valid category under the tutelage of controlling oppositionist Paul Gottfried.
Posted by Pohl Poot on Sun, 15 Mar 2020 13:22 | #
Jonathan Pohl (1:33:58): This is the problem with racial problem with racial reductionists. Alright, so, if everything is uh, genetics, then history and culture and language and geography are totally irrelevant.
Who fits this criteria of racial reductionism? Who is recommending it? Certainly not I. Though perhaps Pohl might think so because I do see genetics as one valid and important criteria in stewarding group maintenance.
Pohl continues (1:34:12):
And the first thing is that White people are not going to be at the top of the heap.
Who said it was about being on top?
Human ecology (of which race distinction is a part) is rather about maintaining our kinds in a horizontal sense.
Johnathan Pohl (1:34:20):
The reason Europeans are successful has nothing to do with race and everything to do with culture and history.
Is he serious? Is he just trying to run camouflage in order to work his way into the system – either for his own purposes or perhaps to act as an agent infiltrator? That would be about the best one could grant him, but it really does not seem to be his purpose. He seems to be taking a markedly liberal, anti-racial position.
Jonathan Pohl (1:34:26):
Otherwise we’d be back to the lie of HBD people that high average I.Q. determines everything.
You see Pohl making the false equivalent between race + human bio diversity + i.q. which is a red cape advanced by the (((Sailer))) camp.
We defend our people not because we have high i.q. but because it is our responsibility, we are indebted to our people for centuries and recognize the value of our qualities.
Pohl (1:37:03):
if everyone were White, then Whiteness would mean nothing.
But everyone isn’t White. White is a tag given to people of European extraction, particularly as it would be awkward to refer to them as European in diaspora …it would be awkward to refer to them as European in Europe for that matter.
Pohl (1:37:05):
It would make no sense to study Whiteness in Iceland.
Why wouldn’t it make sense to study Europeans in Iceland?
Pohl (1:37:14):
No, I’m not part Chinese though my daughter is half Kyrgyz
Pohl (1:43:25):
I got to teach a graduate course in race and ethnicity every year (in the six years that he was in Ghana)
Given that, we can presume the emphasis was on European concerns?
Pohl (2:29:58):
(the Pohl position) is super blue pilled.
That might help you get a job at UVA.
Pohl (2:31:27):
I have seen some of Cotto/ Gottfried streams. I like Paul Gottfried.
I’m not particularly impressed with Cotto though.Paul Gottfried should defect to my stream.
I rest my case. Pohl is even worse than I thought. Both Cotto and Gottfried are virulent Jews, with Gottfried been a key misdirection agent behind the Alt-Right.
Pohl (2:41:44)
Paul Gottfried is uh, quite an impressive figure.
Kind of strange, given that his supervisor for his PhD was probably the worst academic in terms of negative influence on society ever. And that’s Herbert Marcuse.
Yeah, Franz (chat commentor), you know that’s my great, great, great grandfather’s name, Gottfried. One of the one’s from around Lodz in Poland, one of these German settlements with Magdeburg law…
Maybe German, but Lodz is notorious for having had a lot of Jews (e.q., Hollywood Mogul Ludwik Meyer was from Lodz).
Not that that small bit of Jewish heritage would be damning, but the rest of this discussion should have advocates of European peoples looking very critically at what Pohl has to say.
Ecce Lux and some other regulars in racial discussion were in the chat to witness this discussion, so they cannot plead ignorance.
Whereas White is the tag for the race of native European peoples, used because it is awkward to refer to our people as European, particularly when in diaspora; while Nationalism represents the delimitation of the European genus and the delimitation of European nationalist species – very important distinctions and distinctions that our YKW adversaries do NOT want us to make (they look for compliant idiots to oppose and muddle these terms).
They have been intent on casting the left as the enemy, to destroy the pro-social implication and group unionization function of its depth grammar – which is a perfectly natural fit for nationalism i.e., White left ethnonationalism. In fact, contrary to what asshole (Guessedworker) says, not only is there such a thing as left ethnonationalism, there is no effective nationalism that is not left ethnonationalism for the border delimitation that denotes social unionization by nationalism.
By controlled opposition they want to promote right wing identity, to instigate its reactionary purity spiral into pure objectivity, seeking warrant of pure innocence, relief from the exploitative rhetoric and casuistry of relativist praxis through universal truth as unshakable foundation.
But this right wing identity which seeks warrant by sheer objective truth is a vain Cartesian quest; in seeking warrant in objective truth beyond praxis it is susceptible for its rational blindness to social accountability for subjective and relative interests where it does not outright rupture the true stability of systemic homeostasis to be found in social accountability and correctivity, through its practical facilitation by the structuring of relative interests in group unionization.
But where failing to get people to identify as right wing, controlled opposition will settle for a “neither right nor left” response (the ‘clever’ conclusion of the midwit is that “the left/right paradigm is completely phony” and this is) a reaction that also facilitates disorganization and non-accountability just as well.
There is still a third option encouraged by controlled opposition, i.e., the retarded third positionist shit, the kind that Irish nationalist Keith Woods would advocate, as it also abets disorganization, providing back doors for infiltration and subversion through its right wing elements where not direct divide and conquer for lack of social accountability and in-group empathy given its inclusion of Christian tolerance and altruism; or for third positionism’s inclusion of its misnomering, “National Socialism”, nominally justified in its inclusion for its reactionary basis supposedly on objective truth, despite the destructive imperialist supremacism of its objectivist “truth”, the natural fallacy of Hitler; but as Woods nation was not in the path of Nazi wrath; he will probably never learn and continue to rationally blind himself to this, always remain unwittingly controlled for the extent of his hubris.. …joined there by the Thampster, who maintains third positionism as it provides a way to wangle in his backward committment to Christianity; and the grotesque Jewish acolyte, Joel Davis – third positionism is condoned in him as it provides a systemic glory hole allowing him to continue to suck Jewish cock.
Speaking of he who burps Jewish sperm, we might ask who is this clown Lucius Lou is, who interviewed Spencer for Imperial Truth, a podcast appropriately named for a grandiose elitist like Spencer agreed with Lucius that White Nationalism is futile, that the elitists must do as the elitists do; where once Spencer fellated a guy named Charles, who told us that (((Lauren Southern))) believed that it was time for Whites to take street action.
Punching a girl in the face in politically stigmatized street activism when you are already under probation after having spent five years in jail for assault: good tact right winger; it is not only Jesus that will judge you.
The Lies Will Try to Live, but They're Not White, They're Jewish.
This clip (courtesy of Stan Hess) emerges most pertinent in light of Jewish crypsis; along with their twisting and corruption of terms by which we might otherwise organize and understand our people’s interests – as opposed to Jewish influence:
This is a crucial distinction to hold-up against the games they will continue to play with our terminology – and an example of those manichean language games comes with the latest Stark broadcast: http://www.starktruthradio.com/?p=1319
With Jewish “Rachel Haywire”
…and Jewish Ruth, Vivian Veritas, a.k.a. “The Truth Will Live”…
Rather, The Lies Will Try to Live …by infiltrating our interests.
These two try to pawn themselves-off as ‘Alternative Right, right-wingers”…with upstart they say that “THE Left is the establishment.”
(the White Left is the establishment? don’t think so):
Jews do not want us to be a White Left. The reason that they do not want that is because it is our best outlook – an orientation which, together with sufficient anarchy, allows for our coordination and strategic evasion of their infiltration. This capacity to evade their infiltration is facilitated by coordination not merely by place but by language – that is why the terms are so important. Shared terminology serves to coordinate our people wherever they might be while at the same time allowing for sufficient anarchy to evade infiltration, counter our enemies and counter corruption – especially tactical in the clear terminological position of a White Left, its eye on elite betrayal and “scabbing” – i.e., any attempted entry into our “union” by non-Whites.
Sure, these Jews are “the Right ..like reading Spengler and Evola”…just so wild and crazy…“but we’re appealing to the ‘New Generation”…
Rachel Haywire says:
“we’re so ‘in touch’ with the new cultural zeitgest of THE RIGHT”, er, Mulatto Supremacism
“The Left is the establishment”…Jews are just such rebellious trend setters..
“I was at a conference with Richard Spencer and Paul Gottfried”..
…I’m really not interested in race…
I want to create a ‘new species” – read, Mulatto Cyborg…
To note, Greg Johnson banned me from Counter-Currents because I had the nerve to question Dyal’s veracity in advocacy of Whites (and question the extent of his actual Whiteness or mixture, thus motives in fact); this was one example among others where fudgy Johnson’s elitist, vertical discrimination (as opposed to horizontal, qualitative, racial discrimination) leaves him susceptible to infiltrators. Vox Day and Mike Enoch Peinovich are among others; while fudgy even gave a sincere interview to Rachel Haywire.
Haywire continues ibid:
“I’m not really into the race thing, ‘race’ is a mental thing…
..it’s about people who are on like the same wave length..
…people coming together to form new species..
….it’s psychic, like Evola”…
Vivian (Ruth) adds, “I don’t think religion should be about your people (race)”…
The Lies Will Try to Live, but they’re not White, they’re Jewish.
Posted by Millennial Woes on Wed, 03 Jun 2015 17:27 | #
Ruth, who has the channel “The Truth Will Live”, is a close friend of mine. She and I speak regularly about the key issues of the alt-right, including the JQ, and she is on-board with all of it. In particular, residing in a Somali-heavy area of the US, she has to deal with their shit just like the rest of us do, and she hates it and opposes immigration from the Third World as wholeheartedly as any of us do.
To repeat, she is a close friend of mine and I know that she is a good, kind, decent person. I think it is wrong of you to besmirch her unless you have some evidence that she is a fake.
PS. And no, she didn’t ask me to write this post! AFAIK she doesn’t even know about this article.
Posted by Millennial Woes on Fri, 05 Jun 2015 16:41 | #
DanielS,
I understand your position, and I do understand the danger. However, I cannot stand by as my close friends are bad-mouthed when they have done nothing wrong whatsoever. (Note that you conflate Ruth’s statements with Rachel Haywire’s, when they are two very different people.)
Though I am grateful to your site for linking to my channel this last year or so, I ask you to remove that hyperlink now. I do not want to be associated with a site, however worthy it might be, that insults and dismisses my own friends.
Thank you,
MW.
I, DanielS, do not conflate Ruth with Rachel Haywire.
And she has repeatedly taken a position against “the left”, joining the false op that is the atl right as such, and when it failed was ahead in enthusiasm for promoting the term “dissident right” because it “sounds cool.”
She is also a cohort of Melchy Zedek in trying to convert people to Christianity, the Jewish yoke.
Is it really too much to ask of Collett and Enoch to plainly reject Hitler? Forward all Europeans.
The epistemic grounds to reject Hitler should be clear enough to anyone proposing that they are qualified for a leadership role in WN. But these two are apparently carrying-on as if they are pragmatists. How do they propose that their explicitly unapologetic Hitler/Nazi coddling will be anything but terribly divisive of White Nationalism in addition to being epistemologically unnecessary?
If one is to exercise 20/20 hindsight, why not wish that Hitler didn’t attack other European nations; putting efforts instead toward cooperative deportation of non-Europeans?
This is not so much addressed to Enoch-Peinovich, as he has already been quarantined from this platform as an eminently dubious actor. However, Collett…
I won’t elaborate on this much here, as I have an article coming up regarding apparent triangulation against WN in the appeal to Hitler/Nazism, but to address a few absurdities by Collett in this podcast…
First of all, Collett invoked this rule that WN bandies about, which does not make perfect sense: i.e, “never apologize.”
Well, what if you’re terribly wrong? I remember people from the White Voice (guest Heimbach high-fiving host Adams for) refusing to apologize when they mistook Elin Krantz with the actor who posed mounted on top of a black in the mock Swedish National Anthem commercial: therefore “she got what she deserved”. Why not apologize for Elin’s sake?
But this is different. Not asking for an apology from Collett but rather for signs of intelligence enough (or honesty enough) that he can see things better – particularly with 20/20 hindsight.
Carolyn Yeager once described this image (of a Polish woman killed by a Luftwaffe strafing) as “a wounded Polish woman.”
Collett invokes the long ago BBC ambush report to now confirm that he’d still rather his daughter be born in 1930s Germany than some parts of England as she would be “more safe.”
But would his daughter be more safe still, in 1940s Germany, once the Nazi regime got through with murdering millions of people, including millions of civilian women and children, thus provoking revenge and violent retribution upon her?
Would it not be a better idea to find a way to move to a safer part of England while fairly assured that your parenting would give your daughter a better chance to not be groomed, and that you’d have some time for community activism, the kind you engage now, to root-out the problem?
Adding to the foible that he’d rather his daughter be born in 1930’s Germany, while that remark was initiated a long time ago, this one wasn’t: Listing his three favorite books – firstly Mein Kampf. Was that long ago Mark? Sure as reliable Mike Enoch set in motion the whole stiff arm thing that made Richard Spencer Fuhrer for a day…
Now you’ve got Enoch (who thinks he’s proved that he deserves to participate in European advocacy – he thinks so), running interference for you. He says that he’s not going to apologize for his admiration for certain figures of the Nazi era, “they’re going to call everyone Nazis anyway.”….“and look at the gun shows”, how the Nazi memorabilia is snapped up (therefore, it’s really ok to see Hitler’s as just another voice in our round table).
He challenges any of us “optics cucks” (the marketing campaign that Enoch is part of calls for him to suggest that there is no profound reason to reject Hitler, that the argument boils down to how Nazi imagery will look to the “brainwashed” normies), he believes that he can out-verbalize any of us in terms of winning over the “normies.” …confident in his kosher verbal skills, he is.
“…but in terms of who is going to be a part of this movement, it’s got to be White people and really, Jews should be excluded; and, and if you’re going to let in a mixed Jewish person then they really have to have done something to earn that – you know, and I think that in my case, I did.” – Michael ‘Enoch’ Peinovich
Germanophilia encouraged to point of Nazi redemptionism as divide/conquer triangulation against WN
Triangulation
One of the advantages that Jews have in altercasting White identity as right wing or somehow in response/reaction to “the left’s social concerns”, is that they can take advantage of the inherent instability of right wing reactionary rigidity, its quest for pure warrant beyond social accountability and correctability, whether in Nazism’s natural fallacy or Christianity’s otherworldly nonsense (kosher diversion). It has been apparent for some time that some Jewish perspectives are using a triangulation strategy against White identity and solidarity, by encouraging singularly focused Germanophilia in WN, even to the point of encouraging ostensible WN advocates to roll around in Nazi redemptionism and Holocaust well, if not denial, then downplaying with “humor”, etc. With White America being largely German, there is going to be enough of a true believers market, people desperate enough given the onslaught of PC liberalism and lacking in time, energy and concern to see beyond an overly German sympathetic perspective (with its background of Jewish interests) – wanting to believe rather that they are in sheer defiance of the anti-White, PC narrative – such that they will go along with this angle, not particularly concerned that they are playing into a divide and conquer triangulation
Jesus freak Thamster is joined b Josh Neal, with his unfortunate psychologistic background and Jefferson Lee with his newbie foils. Quite articulate of liberalism’s rupture of the organic whole, but what they haven’t figured out is that Hitler and Jesus are not what is needed to keep it together. The day before Richard Spencer’s NPI channel was taken down from Youtube, he was in conversation with these guys extolling the virtues of Mussolini and Hitler (David Duke was doing the same thing the same day and his channel was also taken down after he went on about all the “peace offerings” that Hitler had made. lol). Jefferson Lee invokes the absurd, “they’re going to call you a Nazi anyway” argument (i.e., so may as well prove them right?). When unavailable for a show, Josh says that Jefferson Lee is busy planning revival of The Prussian empire (so funny)
See also, Do Joel Davis and Richard Spencer Want to Suck Jewish Cock?
…or would they prefer to take it up the ass?
The observation of this misdirecting pattern is the important issue at this point. There is no urgent need to trace this pattern to a single or few sources, though there are some of the usual suspects, like Regnery publishing and some of its Alt-Right/Dissident Right/ come Third Positionist/ (((Alt-Lite))) orbiters…
While he is apparently innocuous, David Cole Stein’s Holocaust revisionism has been enough to ingratiate himself in this Jewish sponsored Germanophilism; a proud German-Jew, he is not above coddling Nazism a bit, apparently for the sake of re-routing animus against other Europeans. Cole-Stein uses the revisionist cred and attention that he gets to promote The Institute of Historical Review and “true historians, ‘Mark Weber and David Irving.”
“Hey! quit fuckin around, come on, we’re trying to teach the people something.”
“So this is the denier side.”
“Here we have the three stooges on the denier side (Faurisson, Graf, and Mentionio).”
“This side is the actual historian side. Mark Weber which is represented by the Journal of Historical Review that he edits. David Irving…and then you got me. So, here we have me, Irving, Weber. We represent real history.”
Comments:
rollo clevich
Why did you ignore Arthur Butz?Daniel Sienkiewicz
It seems to me (Cole-Stein ignores Butz) because Butz is a German name (even if a German American). The classic, shifty pivot. David’s classic shifty pivot is apparently to coddle Germans as much as possible, including Nazi apologists, “true historians” Mark Weber and David Irving, to play divide and conquer against Slavics, especially Russian Slavics, including Russian Jewish Slavics who David Cole Stein admits to disliking.
…
While Greg Johnson’s “New Right/Old Right” has denounced Hitler and the Nazi project as counter to current WN interests, of late he has returned to performing rim jobs on overly Nazi sympathetic perspectives. In a recent podcast featured by Counter-Currents, Frodi Midjord goes along with Mark Weber’s (IHR) endorsement of Patrick Buchanan’s dubious, “The Unnecessary War,” to set in motion a perverted line of “reasoning” that blames everybody but Hitler, but especially Churchill for WWII. Of course David Irving’s pro-Hitler slant also works well enough for them. In fact, there are two recent podcasts with Mark Weber featured at Counter-Currents, here is one, “The War That Destroyed The West”. Here is another.
Besides the pandering of Greg Johnson and Counter-Currents, Regnery Publishing has long been suspect, showing signs of promoting this Jewish/German, Germanophilic perspective to the point of soft peddling Nazism. Along with Germanophilic Regnery, there are apparently Jews involved in its executive decision making. The Regnery circus, as we might call it, was pivotal in orchestrating the Alt-Right Tentosphere, a paleoconservative 2.0 which featured tents not only for Christians and right wing Jews, but also for atheistic Nazophiles.
I post this picture a lot, but it remains central, and telling as these paleocon right wingers (and Spencer derivative), double down on their bullshit. Left, Patrick Buchanan, half Irish and half German with a corresponding bias that panders to the bulk of White American demographic reaction. Center, Paul Gottfried, (((paleocon))) maven and leading exponent of “THE Left” as the problem, a Germanophilic, German Jew, he is wont to distinguish Slavic Jews where Jewish culpability is to be acknowledged at all.
Many people orbiting White advocacy, like Jonathan Pohl, Right Ruminations and “Terminal Philosophy” a friend of queer Pilleater, cite Paul Gottfried as a reliable leading light. While Gilad Atzmon is another Jew who tends to pander to the Germanophilic perspective; and will get some endorsement from the likes of David Duke, as such.
The latest means of introducing Nazi triangulation has been through the promotion of “Third Positionism”….
Mark Collett and Keith Woods have been a party to this, sadly along with Morgoth (who should know better, but I already tried and failed to dissuade him). I initially took a disliking to Angelo John Ganucci because he was both popular and taking the line that the most intellectually penetrating of WN were “National Socialists” (Nazis). Typical of right wingers, he demonstrated the inherent instability of the right by becoming a defacto liberal rebounding into “Third Positionist” anti-Zionist (while diaspora Jews can be fellow nationalists with him). Just before he was disgraced, Millennial Warts made a statement that “World War II shouldn’t have happened” and added, to paraphrase, that ‘anybody who can’t accept that Britain made a mistake in entering World War II, that they took the wrong side, is just going to have to step aside, sorry.’ How about Hitler not attacking other European nations if you want to exercise 20/20 hindsight? Warts is soon to be resurrected by Fudge Johnson for an interview over there at Counter-Currents.
Johnson can be a bad judge of character; recall that Warts was indignant with me and Majorityrights when I criticized his (self admitted) confidante (((Vivian Veritas))) for attempting to define terms for White nationalism, and Warts demanded that his link be removed from our site. the_lies_will_try_to_live_but_theyre_not_white_theyre_jewish
Some flaming asshole going by the name of Tom Anderson is a definite gate keeper – he has a wrench on several podcasts and is decidedly against me for my stance against Nazophiles in particular; but strangely, he will join Christians, such as Melchy Zedech when they antagonize me, even when they side with Jews, such as Vivian Veritas.
Church of Entropy joined Wll2PWR and Ovfuckyou to attack me for not adopting a right wing position when I began talking with Ecce Lux; in CoE’s case (and she has no business in WN circles) her motive might have been a bit different, but she was joining Wll2PWR who was attacking me mainly because I’m not Germanophilic to the point of Nazism and Ovfuckyou, decidedly against me because I maintain a platform which rejects Nazism.
I lost confidence in Ecce Lux not as much because of his Christianity, but because he let Ov attack me for rejecting Nazism, trying to say that I was too sensitive because I didn’t want to entertain it; that he’d “been through that” – “brainwashed” into thinking that “the Nazis were bad.”
Ecce Lux and Faustian Spirit (who I talked to and also should know better) apparently go along with this Right Wing/Third Positionist angle encouraged by Tom Anderson; while Dennis Dale tags along, unwilling or unable to get out of the kosher discourse box.
Idiotic Chinese woman, Claire Khaw, panders to Nazophiles with the absurd line that she just wants to promote “real nationalism” and “Hitler just wanted his day in the sun.” To demonstrate the innocent integrity of Nazi Germany, she brought an Israeli onto her show to talk with Nazi ovfuckyou, and he agreed that the “Nazis were really Ok”, apparently the argument being that if that’s what it takes to sort people to their nations (and take care of ‘Jewish traitors’ of Zionistm?).
In penchant for the laconic and incisive, GW observed the “triangulation” that inspired this article.
The epistemic grounds to reject Hitler should be clear enough to anyone proposing that they are qualified for a leadership role in WN. But these two (Mark Collett and Mike ‘Enoch’ Peinovich) are apparently carrying-on as if they are pragmatists. How do they propose that their explicitly unapologetic Hitler/Nazi coddling will be anything but terribly divisive of White Nationalism in addition to being epistemologically unnecessary?
If one is to exercise 20/20 hindsight, why not wish that Hitler didn’t attack other European nations; putting efforts instead toward cooperative deportation of non-Europeans?
If you are able to articulate public relations manipulation so well, how did you wind up altercast?
27 July 2020:
The Absolute State Of Britain #62: The Kosher Sausage-Roll (With MORGOTH)
Morgoth (136:14): I’ve done a few videos on this where the government and every relationship to public relations departments that they use to manage public mood.
In The Home Office, you can even see The Home Office website, they call it the nudge strategy; and what they mean is that first they’ve got contingency plans for everything that can happen; and then they’ve also got PR departments which roll out PR campaigns in order to get the people thinking the way that they want, so that the population is like being permanently managed by the government itself via these PR departments; and they call it the nudge…
..and nudging people in “the right way” so all those tick-tock videos from the pandemic I mean it’s fascinating because…it, I feel like a fucking guinea pig because we’ve just been in the full lock-down thing .. it’s easing up a bit now; and then it’s as if we’ve been like…you get whiplash where you’re whisked into this now, this whole Black Lives Matter thing…just one straight after the other and I’m like you think that I’m, I, are we like a mouse in a proper maze here.
It’s somehow about how we react and how the population is managed because you know what….
Because here’s the thing and I’ve never seen the kind of individualists like Spike take this on. But the problem that you have (I know it’s a joke, but), in theory, we’re a liberal society and that’s supposed to be made up of a mass of individuals who are all able to get to the truth and formulate their own opinions and then they will vote for the party on that [knowledge] and so on and so on…that’ll be how they view the world.
The problem is, if you’re then in the business of managing, macro-managing the entire population, and we’re seeing that right now with Black Lives Matter, then what does that actually say about your individualistic society?
Because what’s happened is, they’re not able to get to any kind of truth, they’re not able to formulate any kind of opinions because all the information that they’re being fed is bullshit and according to a larger agenda.
So this kind of makes a complete mockery out of the individualist because what are you basing all of this on?
And you can see the results of it. I mean, we spoke about it all night here – the middle chunk, who are the most conformist will all, at the individual level, think of themselves as being individuals who make up their own minds.
And yet they agree with the government PR campaigns. It’s not even a conspiracy. All of these different PR companies have got flashy websites and when you go on the websites they’re all like a bunch of millennial bug-men, with target-charts; and all of that kind of thing.. all right out in the open… they’re just managing the public mood…. and to me, it’s this really dire critique of the liberal society; where everybody is an individual who makes up their own mind, because they’re obviously not.
[…]
Yuro (200:56): “See ya Kyle” (a “funny” way of saying “Seig Heil”, because we all think that’s such a cool salutation, don’t we?).
Now, “The Absolute State of Britain” airs over at Mike Enoch’s TRS Network – which I have long recognized as the main distribution outlet for the kosher marketing campaign devised to take White reaction against neo-conservatism, PC and increasing Jewish power and influence circa 2008, and to direct (nudge) it into a revised (((paleoconservatism))) 2.0 called the Alt-Right (now dissident right/ or neither left nor right as “increasingly meaningless terms” or third positionism) against a characterology of the left.
That is, they were nudging the reaction to stay on the right (anti social, stigmatic, disruptive and divisive of organizational power) and providing voice to White reaction, alt-right tents among the tentosphere (Christians, Nazis, the scientistic, the nutty conspiracy theorists and yet another tent for right wing Jews as proposed allies) if they went along and manifested some anti-social stigma, maintained identity as right wing reaction against hyperbolic inernationalist/anti-nationalist Marxist and Cultural Marxist (anti-White) organization/ coalitions characterized as “THE” Left, characterized as didactically repulsive and absurd so that Whites didn’t get the idea of White Left Ethnonationalism and its concept of broad unionization to delimit and protect the bounds of White people – because then they’d begin to organize their power and set sights on the pervasive pattern of kosher folks who naturally advocated for liberal scabbing of their borders and bounds as a rule; and then they’d look up and see who was on top, fucking them over: Kosher folks in 7-9 power niches in tandem with White right wing elitist sell outs, purity spiralists and Liberals taking the license, licentiousness offered them in the disordered circumstance of their borders and bounds having been flung wide open.
I have elaborated in many places about how and what it means to be right wing and liberal (objectivism at its base as an excuse with ever narrowing, “more pure” warrant as its source of power; minimizing accountability to borders and bounds of one’s people, indebtedness and responsibility thereof) and why the kosher folks want Whites to maintain that identity. Also, a characterology of “The Left” with all the absurdities of the exaggerated abuses of group organization, individual agency and activism, associated even at its base, organizational essence, as something only for anti-Whites.
…a dozen memes perhaps (red pills, normies, optics cucking, social justice warriors, etc) provided by some NY PR firm and placed in the portfolio of a Mike Enoch to deliver to the goyim with an instruction, “Be as anti-Semitic and pro-Hitler as you need.” …“call your show the ‘Daily Shoah’ and make ‘oven’ jokes… you’ll establish the ‘vanguard’ and tell people that the ‘normies’ don’t understand like we do, nor do the ‘optics cucks’, so for the most part we’ll have to wink and nod, knowing that “our Uncle” (Enoch literally refers to Hitler that way in the show below) had it all right, but they won’t understand, so keep it cool, “See Kyle!” (lol) until enough of them are ‘red pilled’, especially given the ‘lefties’ out there, who might not want us to deny ‘the holahoax’….you know how unreasonable and anti free speech THE LEFT is.”
The Absolute State Of Britain #61: Black Riots Matter (With MIKE ENOCH)
Meanwhile we’ve got other tents working the other right wing reactionary angles to direct them against our characterology of “The Left”. We’ve got the Christian tents to keep the goyim yoked under Noahide law.
We’ve got Keith Preston to help them, e.g., Todd Lewis and Right Ruminations to maintain the left as the demon.
Where audience turns for something else, we’ve got a tent for people who say “neither left nor right” so that Whites don’t get any idea of the organizational power of White Left Ethnonationalism.
And if they begin to get the idea, we can subvert it with another tent to appeal to newbies with “Third Positionism”..served up by useful idiots Keith Woods (with Cultured Thug, who was singing the virtues of third positionism, Hitler and Mussolini with Richard Spencer et al, the day before Spencer’s channel got taken down), Thamster, Jefferson Lee and Eric Striker (Mike Enoch there to help, of course), promoting it to provide a back door and means to maneuver our people by exploiting its no account, non socially corrective rigid reaction against our social systemic homeostasis/ self corrective, self governing autonomy (specifically subverted by introducing to this left cover, an option for Christianity, or the rational blindness of scientism and objectivism, which dovetails with Hitler adulation).
To shore up this reactionary position against the left, cooler heads will be directed from that horror show back to the home base Gottfried tent where it all started for good old fashioned paleoconservatism; and now that Richard Spencer took the nudge a bit too far at Mike Enoch’s prompting, we have the still edgy, but not too edgy new paleocon, Nick Fuentes, to retain the Christian, Noahide jurisdictional yoke.
Of Course, Christianity is the Biggest PaleoCon of all ... the Largest Expression of Controlled Opposition.
Gottfried's continued "defense" of White Christians as "persecuted" by "the left" and the suggestion that they should "rebel" into their Christianity as an expression of PaleoCon controlled opposition.
Paul Gottfried continually talks about the PC oppression of White Christians and makes it seem like an act of rebellion for them to “rebel” into fervent Christianity, rather than recognizing it as the Abrahamic, Nohahide yoke of controlled opposition that Christianity is.
Under Pressure, it appears that Richard Spencer has begun to favor the NeoCon side, it’s imperialist supremacism being a more natural fit to his personality and interests, his Nietzschean / Faustian overman bullshit and so on, but he is compelled to a Paleocon hat tip to Christianity, disingenuously claiming that Jesus existed as a historical figure in the flesh, when there is no good evidence for that what-so-ever.
Richard is free to follow his elitist predilections, prance around aloof from the dregs of White Nationalism and still be free to have a voice provided he says things which the Noahide lawyers want him to say – he must denounce White Nationalism and describe it as futile; and as a conciliatory gesture to the PaleoCons whom he failed, he must say that Jesus Christ walked in the flesh; even though in all likelihood, he knows that never happened; but that yoking to Noahide law is a crucial part of the PaleoCon bargain that he is under if he is to be free to pursue his elitist predilections, imperialism, supremacism, which fit better under the rubric of NeoConservative Controlled opposition. And that’s the point, he is going to appear to exonerate himself of WN association under a kind of NeoCon controlled opposition, all Nietzschean and Faustian and all.
Richard Spencer (5:45): We could get into an argument as to whether or not Jesus Christ existed. I generally think that he did exist, he was a real person. …and, of course, became parabolic and mythic in his death.”
What we know of what he was saying.. he was a doomsayer …. literally the end was coming tomorrow, maybe …we are living in end, this doomsday is coming and that was a very important part of his message… obviously the end did not come… when that prophesy failed Christianity became the words and the became the believers much more so than just him … and I think something similar is happening, going to happen with Q.”
Lucius (18:45): “Very recently you wrote a tweet thread on uh, nationalism, where you referred to it as a shit magnet essentially. I think that is entirely accurate.
I enjoy as much as anyone else intellectual exercises, theorizing, philosophizing, etc., but all that is valueless if it can’t be grounded in reality.
It is up to us who have the vision to be honest with people and tell hard truths – like this: White Nationalism was always dead on arrival. What do you think?”
Richard Spencer: “Yes.” I agree. “
Lucius: “I thought you would”
Spencer: I mean …as a Nietzschean … you could say that we have to face the fact that White Nationalism as its been constituted, kind of always has been dead on arrival. …and I think it’s always told itself lies. ..and I think there’s a challenge for us to move beyond this kind of thing (let’s out a great sigh, looks despairing).
Lucius: “I agree … a lot of it does become a shit magnet [Editorial question: who is throwing the shit? Jews and their right wing/liberal minions perhaps?] ..because of the reactionary thought process that’s involved in it. It’s always like, oh, this person said this thing, let’s all explode and react to it in childish ways and never actually develop something. You could say like a White Nationalist, one of the things they’re for is a White country, but there’s no principles.”
Spencer: “Yeah, we had a White country and look how it turned out.”
Lucius: “You made an old expression popular again when you said, ‘become who you are’ – that’s always stuck with me and I think becoming who you are involves like, accepting our history, including the Enlightenment, The French Revolution. …you know, that’s all part of our story: liberalism. So, we can’t just react to our forefathers, we have to progress from them”
Spencer: “Right.” “Yes”… “I mean, while recognizing serious limitations, uh, in ourselves and not just treating the west as some museum that we want to maintain. Which is also a very bad tendency – the Paleo tendency, you could say.
We have to understand where nihilism is coming from and its not all a matter of some mean, lying Jews out there who tricked us.
..even if you want to accept that fact, the idea that we’re so easily tricked is rather disconcerting…. you know, the con man needs a mark and the mark needs a con man (?) much like cattle needs a cowboy (?) and a cowboy needs cattle.”
… a lot of these things amounted to a desire to overcome something and I think they could lead to some bad places and I think they have led to nihilism in our sense; but I think we can admire at least the will to overcome; and not retreat to some earlier thing that we already overcame.”
At this point Spencer emphasizes (over emphasizes) the necessity of modernist side of post modernity, its scientific rationality to overcome lame traditions and “the current, “nihilistic order” and not retreat to something that we’ve already overcome, which is the typical conservative viewpoint.”
Lucius: “One of the books that I’ve recommended to you in the Warhammer 40k series …it’s not called a religion, but its basically a religion of reason.
..as a way to cut through the darkness and get beyond expired ideals.”
Spencer (52:25): ..its just another White Nationalist fantasy, that it’s all going to collapse and it’s not going to happen and I probably don’t want that to happen either. …Planet of the Apes not withstanding.”
….
Now, why would Spencer be saying this, going in the direction of the modernist side of post modernity without White ethnoNationalism? Is it because he is an elitist fuck head taking a pay off or at very least trying to stay out of further trouble? Probably yes.
The Horowitz Angle…
David Horowitz and Paul Gottfried occupy two axial points of Jewish motivation to promote a marketing campaign against “the left” and characterology thereof, while altercasting manipulable right wing reactionary positions for Whites given intersectionality with the (((progressive stack of PC victim groups))) against their Jewish interests, their need to get ahead of the reaction to NeoConservatism’s Operation Clean Break / Wars for Israel and reaction to the 2008 financial meltdown/ bail-out.
While I have called attention to David Horowitz as a leading Jewish figure in advancing the marketing campaign – in Jewish interests, obviously – against “THE Left” and indeed, he has contributed to exposing the Cultural Marxist/PC Anti-White Left, I have focused more on Paul Gottfried in terms of posing “The Left” in opposition to White identity and nationalism by definition. Nevertheless, both conveniently ignore the possibility (and necessity) of a White Left Ethnonationalism, instead altercasting any White identitarianism which might respond as some kind of Right –
Alt-Right in Gottfried’s case, with flunkey Richard Spencer figure-heading the addition of new tents, more youthful, flagrantly rebellious and anti-social, secular, along with Paleoconservative and Jewish right wing (Alt Lite) tents – moving to “Dissident Right” after Charlottesville and “Hail Trump”, Spencer then falling to the wayside in favor of a more streamlined but still edgy/ ironic Paleoconservatism (Christianity being what it cannot deviate from) and Third Positionism (includes right wing elements, obviously) – But I haven’t talked much about Horowitz’ part in the marketing campaign, positioning White identity against “The Left” and altercasting White Nationalism as some kind of Right (come Third Positionism, or neither left nor right populism, susceptible to infiltration and ineffective if not self destructive right wing reaction).
Related:
J.F. Gariepy talks with Thomas Goodrich, whom he refers to as a “major historian.”
This attempted redemption of Nazi propaganda has already…
J.F. Gariepy gives Roosh V. a B.J.
But Roosh V. is someone I have the highest respect for.
And it is the most honor I’ve ever felt about a guest coming here!
Related:
Though J.F. Gariepy claims to be thinking independently in his terminological deployment, the discourse parameters he follows are within the altercast box prescribed by Jewish interests and serving them; as ever, a caveat thus in regard to Gariepy’s use of the term “The Left” and its “characterizations;” while this usage and characterology is fairly true when looked upon as a Marxist Internationalist or Cultural Marxist Left, assailing White national, group and personal boundaries, absent the delimiting working hypotheses of the White Ethnonational Left, viz., unionization to structure accountability and gauge correctivity for Whites, Gariepy’s advice is more free floating (and, he admits, nihilistic) than it should be – providing feedback looking toward the more objective facts irrespective of our subjective and relative interests, but lacking the radical orientating context without the centering calibration of White Left Ethnonationalism’s relative, systemic interests.
JF Gariepy discusses recent Youtube bans, including Red Elephants: (6:31)“But then, lets not fool ourselves into thinking that the current order is a liberal one. We don’t live in a liberal society. In a liberal society, you can’t lose your channel like Vincent James just lost it today. That is bullshit. These people are not liberals.”
in regard to his assessment given the recent Youtube bans, viz., of Vincent James, actually, Gariepy is off the mark. The internationalist Marxist, anti-White Cultural Marxist agenda is about liberalizing White National borders and boundaries to the extreme completion – to where we can conserve nothing (not even a Youtube channel with the aim of conserving any vestige of White human ecology).
The discussion below, from NPR Fresh Air, does well to place David Horowitz in the scheme of things. However, it only provides a semblance of explanation of his motivation for terminological and conceptual misdirection of White interests in order to serve Jewish interests as they’ve been intersected by their former client advocacy positions….
All text except for images and captions are from NPR, Fresh Air:
…..
It’s impossible to understand the Trump era, with its unparalleled polarization, without tracing Stephen Miller‘s journey to the White House. That’s what my guest, Jean Guerrero, writes in her new book, “Hatemonger: Stephen Miller, Donald Trump, And The White Nationalist Agenda.
[…]
GROSS: So David Horowitz, who we’ve been talking about, who became a mentor, a far-right mentor to Stephen Miller – you know, Horowitz started off as as a leftist. He was one of the editors of the leftist magazine Ramparts. He, I think, was, you know, an ally of the Black Panthers. Like, what do you know about why and how he changed so radically? He moved from, like, one pole to the other.
GUERRERO: Yeah. I mean, David Horowitz had recommended his friend Betsy (Van Patter) to work on the accounting for the Black Panthers. She’s a white woman. And she ended up being murdered. And the murder was never solved, but David Horowitz blamed the Black Panthers Party and became convinced that they had murdered her. And after that, you saw David Horowitz go through this transformation where he became convinced that the movement that he had been a part of, the left, had waged a unfair war on whiteness – is what he called it. He felt that whiteness was actually something that needed to be preserved.
And, I mean, he tries not to write about it outright as whiteness being preserved. But he talks about how the only important racism in society is racism against white people and that racism against Black and brown people is a figment of your imagination. And it really goes back to the murder of his friend Betty, who he blamed on the Black Panthers.
And it really started to lean into these, you know, misleading statistics that are put out by publications like American Renaissance, this white supremacist publication that paints brown and Black people as innately more violent than white people. And David Horowitz is the one who introduced Stephen Miller to websites like American Renaissance. He describes the founder of American Renaissance, Jared Taylor, to me, as a very smart man, who he claims has a perverse ethnic view because, again, David Horowitz, you know, tries to distance himself from the white nationalist movement because he knows how important it is to launder these ideas through the language of heritage and national security if you want them to appeal to the mainstream.
GROSS: This is FRESH AIR. Let’s get back to my interview with Jean Guerrero, author of the new book “Hatemonger: Stephen Miller, Donald Trump, And The White Nationalist Agenda.” She is a former investigative reporter for KPBS, the public TV and radio station in San Diego. She’s now freelance and continues to report for public media. She previously covered Mexico and Central America for the Wall Street Journal and Dow Jones Newswires.
So we’ve been talking about how David Horowitz mentored Stephen Miller. And Horowitz helped Stephen Miller launch his career. He first got him a job with Michele Bachmann when she was elected as a congressperson, and she was very conservative. So what job did he get working with Michele Bachmann?
GUERRERO: He was hired as a press secretary for Bachmann, and that was his first job. And that’s kind of where Stephen Miller starts to learn about, you know, how to write these very hyperbolic press releases. And he starts to, you know, bombard reporters late into the night with his press releases and links and FYIs.
GROSS: So David Horowitz first gets Stephen Miller a job withCongressperson Michele Bachmann. And then from there, Horowitz gets Miller a job with Jeff Sessions when Jeff Sessions was a senator from Alabama who, like Stephen Miller, was very anti-immigration. So what was the relationship like between Sessions and Miller when Miller was working for him?
GUERRERO: So Miller – you know, he really helped to turn Jeff Sessions into sort of a very combative personality. He – I mean, Sessions was already a leading nativist on Capitol Hill when Stephen Miller joined. But Stephen Miller started to model Jeff Sessions, his remarks, after the far-right, combative media personalities that Stephen Miller had been familiar with his entire life – so really pulling, you know, talk radio talking points onto Capitol Hill and having Jeff Sessions, you know, talk about how too much immigration is going to, quote, “decimate” this country and how anyone who supports immigration reform is part of a globalist elite who wants to destroy the country through limitless importation of cheap labor in the form of mass migration. So these ideas of demonization Stephen Miller really incorporated into Jeff Sessions’ rhetoric.
GROSS: So he becomes Jeff Sessions’ press secretary, and then Sessions and Miller end up in the Trump administration. And Steve Bannon helped get Stephen Miller into the Trump administration, and Bannon was another one of Stephen Miller’s mentors. What was Bannon’s role in Stephen Miller’s life before Bannon was pushed out of the Trump administration?
GUERRERO: So Bannon, you know, gives Stephen Miller a platform on Breitbart while Stephen Miller was working for Jeff Sessions. Basically, Stephen Miller was given free reign over a lot of the writers at Breitbart to just kind of shape their stories and provide them with ideas that they were expected to turn into stories. And during this time is when Stephen Miller was feeding, you know, articles from white nationalist and white supremacist websites to Breitbart and having them do stories about them, you know, painting immigrants as an existential threat.
So Bannon – you know, he gives him a platform on Breitbart and helps connect him with the people on the Trump campaign, where Stephen Miller was initially providing free labor for the Trump campaign, you know, sending over talking points and memos and then eventually gets himself hired in 2016 as the senior policy advisor and top speechwriter for President Trump.
[…]
GROSS: The book “The Camp Of The Saints.”
GUERRERO: “The Camp Of The Saints,” yeah. It demonizes people of color. But it also demonizes their allies. It demonizes anti-racists as agitators and anarchists and as mobs, which you then now see Trump using that exact same language to talk about anti-racist protesters ever since, you know, the police killing of George Floyd. So Stephen Miller is really drawing – whether he’s doing so consciously or not, I mean, Stephen Miller read this book. He promoted this book. And a lot of the language in this book you are now seeing Trump using.
GROSS: Well, among the many riddles surrounding Stephen Miller is – you know, he’s Jewish. His grandparents were immigrants. And he espouses some views that are espoused by white supremacists. White supremacist hate Jews.
GUERRERO: Mmm hmm.
GROSS: They would like Jews to, like, leave the country or at least live in a separate space on their own. How does he reconcile that? I’m sure you don’t know the answer to that. But don’t you wonder?
In line with the synthetic concern of PaleoConservatism to promote America’s Enlightenment based principles in a package with Judeo-Christianity, Paul Gottfried continually signals the victimhood of White Christians, suggesting the controlled oppositional angle that they should “rebel” into their Judeo-Christian yoke.
In fact there is a big push of this PaleoCon angle to assert that accepting Christianity is a necessary and integral part of White Nationalism. To name a few salient examples of this push:
Richard Spencer has been forced to profess absurd belief in the historical reality of a Jesus who lived in the flesh.
Recently Patrick Casey has made the argument with Joel Davis that WN arguing against Christianity is wrong because it is just too popular. But the fact is that most Whites do not believe in Christianity, especially not in Europe.
The Thampster is a similar Christian advocate.
Obviously E. Michael Jones is one as well, taking it a step further in denying “White” as a legitimate category.
Melchyzedek has tried fervently to obstruct my voice because I am not Christian.
Over at Majorityrights, Thorn harassed me for a year because I have sense enough to realize what misdirecting bullshit that Christianity is and sought to banish it from the platform finally when his and other Christian’s trolling was just too obnoxious and counter-productive.
Even Roosh V. (former Manosphere advocate of R Selective Strategy to exploit White women) of all people, is trying to get into the act of promoting Christianity. He’s largely been welcome in the Alt-Right come Dissident Right tentosphere.
And the Paleocon Noahidization agenda is working hard on and through the “TradThots”
Those who think we should be careful about THOT leaders, Trad or otherwise, are correct.
Black Pidgeon Speaks Blond in the Belly of the Beast
She says that she “hates White Leftists most of all.”
… but does she hate White Left EthnoNationalists?
This is one among many articles I’ve written and talks I’ve given distinguishing White Left EthnonNationalism only to have asshole (Guessedworker) try to say that that I have “always talked only in terms of a white left!” Yes, and asshole added to the exclamation point to his complete inaccuracy.
I’ve known for some time now that since about 2011 or 2012 that the Chinese have unfortunately adopted the “White Left” as a slur term for White (or what they perceive as White) cultural Marxists and corollary liberals.
However, I’m not really worried about the Chinese smear “White Left” for a couple important reasons.
White Left (ethno) Nationalism is internally consistent in its position. And in its rule structure, it is not only totally different from cultural Marxism and liberalism, it is in fact closer to the opposite in its disposition to White (European descent) boundaries and borders, regarding rather a serious concern to curate our history, to maintain our inheritance and lineage. This internal consistency of White Left definition is immediately verifiable as such and can be referred to at any time – the application of the term has been consistent in its call for an effective genetic unionization of our peoples – recognizing in and out groups – genetic group(s) called “our” people as opposed to genetic friends and enemies – this provides for accountability to human ecology, historical social capital; and crucially, among the important reasons to retain the moniker “left”, accountability against potential elite betrayal (as they are in key positions to do most damage from limited positions); along with safe guarding not only the interests of rank and file, it ensures criteria (“union rules”) that provide for their accountability as well, against any propensity which they, as rank and file, may have toward over-liberalization of national/group bounds, viz. significant transgressions of bounds and borders.
White Left (ethno) Nationalism is Nationalist – therefore it is not liberal, it speaks of ecological delimitations of peoples, not universal liberalism as the Chinese smear term would describe, or similarly, as our smear term “Red Left”, i.e., Jewish left, would be descriptive of – a “universal leftism” – i.e., a universal liberalism which the Chinese call White Left and what I call “Red” or “Jewish Left”, is prescribed by Jewish interests and their internationalist right wing cohorts, prescribed for others and instigated of them to participate in activism toward a withering away of the state in favor of an arbitrarily composed and controllable international proletariat.
Whereas our Class, the White Class, corresponds to the whole delimited ethno Nation, rich, poor, private property and business owners, whomever, innocent until proven guilty – as a rule, accounts requested should be kept to a minimum.
But because we are accountable as nationalists, of our rank and file while maintaining a vigilance on elite betrayal and liberal internationalism, we are therefore able to cooperate with our left nationalist friends, such as the Chinese and other left nationalists, against right wing / liberal imperialism as it would be imposed by Jewish interests along with their right wing/liberal White cohorts and their Muslim and black shock troop enforcers.
Finally, the Chinese term, White Left, that has been in vogue in China since about 2011 to label White/Jewish Cultural Marxists/liberals, is a word spoken in Chinese; while we speak English and take full advantage of our capacity to define White Left Nationalism as we see fit, and have done that, consistently.
It is entirely different from liberalism and cultural Marxism. Rather it is true security in what is most important and true liberation for our people, our sovereignty as such.
If anything, the Chinese use of the term “White Left” as a smear only confirms Jewish hegemony over prevailing and pervasive discourse – with cultural Marxism reaching its apex during the final days of television’s pre-eminence (a horrible situation where this TV box issued propaganda and you could not talk back, interact and correct what it was saying) in the early 1990’s after the fall of The Soviet Union and before the advent of the internet. The dialectic between Jewish left and Jewish right began a slow, controlled evolution away from the Marxist culture of critique following the fall of communism; and went into full swing in the other direction of Jewish controlled dialectic, with the sub-prime crisis of 2008, as Jewish consolidation of power niches made criticism of “the right” no longer to their advantage, now that they were on top of seven power niches – critique of the right began to “intersect” against their interests – i.e., a continued critique of the right and popularization of a friendly disposition toward a left perspective would highlight their unjust power and influence; as such would call for unionized alliances against them. Hence, they have marshaled the hegemony of discourse more and more against “the left”, with the spearhead “Alternative Right.” At this point, they have so successfully hoodwinked the masses it seems the YKW have everybody constantly ranting against “the left” …how convenient, what a Cohencidence!
Of course they rattle on with a bunch of cliches – typically accusing us of trying to apply artificial concepts to nature, of being anti-nature, being on an impossible quest for “equality”; and they constantly interpose straw men as opposed to what we are really saying – saying cultural Marxism and liberalism are “the left” – when, in fact, these “movements” are the opposite of left activism, the opposite for White unionization, anyway – i.e., anything but a “White Left.”
But they carry on with these cliches and ridiculous distortions that cultural Marxism has promulgated, oblivious to the fact that we are not guilty of the theoretical errors, gross distortions of hermeneutics and social contructionism, the flagrant violation of scientific fact that they point to as examples of “our perfidy” in advance of their newly (((consecrated))) heroic bastion of truth and anti-PC, the “Right” and “Alt-Right.”
And so I say to my Left Nationalist Chinese comrades, with a wink at that term, comrade, what you are calling “White Left” is not a White left at all, but cucked Whites and cucking Jews who are imposing liberalism and cultural Marxism upon the west, opening its bounds and boundaries with the aim now of aligning its right wing reaction against Muslim “extremists”, “Hispanics” and Asians.
The Left as liberalism is an oxymoron that the regular right and Alt Right slavishly partakes of, as their Jewish flank does and would have them do. A White Left (ethno) Nationalism observes the principle of unionization, its recognition and maintenance of in and out groups, which is the opposite of liberalism and its arbitrary doing away with any such provision for accountability to unionized bounds and borders.
To repeat in sum, the Chinese slur ‘White Left’ as a designator of Cultural Marxism and its liberal activism shows Jewish discourse hegemony and influence, its diversion from true White Left Nationalism. It is a testimony to Jewish hegemony in discourse heretofore and how much they don’t want a true White left.
It is a reflection really, of how much the YKW and their right wing cohorts, sell outs, loyalists to their elitist ilk, whatever, don’t want us to have a concept of a proper White Left, unionization of our peoples to provide for social accountability and vigilance on elite betrayal as such, in a way that right wing, objectivist and otherworldly criteria do not provide – they propose disingenuous and naive avoidance of social accountability.
It just goes to show how comprehensive that the Jews have been in denying a White left, in cucking the very notion, that they have the vast nation of China calling White liberals and cultural Marxists, “the White Left”
Maybe Black Pigeon Speaks isn’t Jewish, but I’d want to see a DNA test to prove that, both for reasons of what he says and for how he looks – seems quite Jewish on both counts. And yes, he fits well, even if ad hoc, with the Jewish marketing campaign of Jewish hegemonic interests against “the left” – particularly in this propaganda piece to promote the Chinese slur of liberalism and cultural Marixism as “White Left.”
Along with the deception of hegemonic Jewish discourse, one by which they are doing all they can to align White advocacy with their Jewish interests against “the left”, one must also take into account the fact that if Jewish crypsis can fool White people into not making a distinction between Whites and Jews, think how much more their crypsis would fool Chinese!
And the White protests and push back against Jewish sponsored activist/violence has been nothing by comparison.
“They’re not gonna stop and they should not let up, beware!” – Kamala Harris on support for BLM riots
Conservative News Daily, Youtube, 27 August 2020:
Clip of Kamala Harris speaking to Stephen Colbert in June is going viral again, as the party attempts to pivot away from their support of the violent riots.
Stephen Colbert: I want to be clear that I know that there are still “protests” that are happening in major cities across The United States…
Kamala Harris (smiles enthusiastically) Yeah!
Stephen Colbert: …we’re just not seeing the reporting on it…that I had for the first few weeks
Kamala Harris: Right, that’s right… but they’re not going to stop! They’re not going to stop! This is a movement I’m telling you! They’re not going to stop. And everyone beware! Because they’re not going to stop… it is gonna … they’re not gonna stop before election day in November and they’re not going to stop after election day. And that should be, everyone should take note of that, on both levels. That this isn’t, they’re not going to let up, and they should not, and we should not!
Biden Responds to a Jewish man’s hyperbolic concerns, having been “shaken” by he Trump protestors entry into the Capitol and the “White supremacism” of these people’ by saying that he is treating White supremacy as the greatest domestic terror threat and that he can speak some Yiddish with the questioner.
Note how Red Ice presents Breitbart as a sage:
That’s because they were never able to get out of the box.
And we might ask, rather, is Biden going to renegotiate The Iran Deal to set them up for infraction and attack by “consensus”?
“Considering that Joe Biden – an avowed “Zionist” whose three children all married Jews and raised his grandchildren as Jews – has been a long time loyal supporter of the foreign state of Israel, it would seem ridiculous for the “conservative, far-right” Breitbart.com to accuse Biden’s cabinet, with nearly all the important positions filled by Zionist Jews, of being “anti-Israel” and even “anti-semitic.”
“But they will” – Banned Hipster
HOW JEWISH IS THE BIDEN CABINET? – by Daniel Barge
His Vice Presidential pick, Kamala Harris – husband, Jewish
Here are Biden’s existing appointments and nominees for these 21 positions and their ethnicities:
Secretary of State (Antony Blinken – WHITE-JEWISH)
Secretary of the Treasury (Janet Yellin – WHITE-JEWISH)
Secretary of Defense (Lloyd Austin – BLACK)
Attorney General (Merrick Garland – WHITE-JEWISH)
Secretary of the Interior (Deb Haaland – MIXED RACE (Red Indian + Norwegian))
Secretary of Agriculture (Tom Vilsack – WHITE-CATHOLIC)
Secretary of Commerce (Gina Raimondo – WHITE-CATHOLIC (Italian American))
Secretary of Labor (Marty Walsh – WHITE-CATHOLIC (Irish American))
Secretary of Health and Human Services (Xavier Becerra – HISPANIC (Mexican American))
Secretary of Housing and Urban Development (Marcia Fudge – BLACK)
Secretary of Transportation (Pete Buttigieg – WHITE-CATHOLIC)
Secretary of Energy (Jennifer Granholm – WHITE-CATHOLIC (Scandinavian + Irish))
Secretary of Education (Miguel Cardona – HISPANIC (Puerto Rican))
Secretary of Veterans Affairs (Denis McDonough – WHITE-CATHOLIC (Irish American))
Secretary of Homeland Security (Alejandro Mayorkas HISPANIC-JEWISH)
Trade Representative (Katherine Tai – ASIAN (Chinese American))
Director of National Intelligence (Avril Haines – WHITE-JEWISH)
Director of the Office of Management and Budget (Neera Tanden – ASIAN (Indian-American))
Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (William Burns – WHITE CATHOLIC (Irish-American))
Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (Michael S. Regan – BLACK)
Administrator of the Small Business Administration (Isabel Guzman – HISPANIC-JEWISH)Out of the 21 positions:
- Seven are Whites with a Catholic background (33%)
- Six are Jewish (28.5%)
- Four are Hispanic (19%)
- Three are Black (14.3%)
- Two are Asian (9.5%)
- Zero are White with a Protestant ethnic background.
The main group in sheer numbers are Catholic Whites, but the Jews are extremely well represented. In fact it is hard to deny that Jew obsessives have a case here (28.5% of the cabinet posts with only around 2% of the US population). They will also insist that the more important positions are dominated by Jews, and point to other posts not included in the 21 cabinet position listed by Wikipedia, such as the White House Chief of Staff, etc.
The Biden Plan:Democrat ‘Justice’ Bill Would Seize Farmland And Give It To Blacks.
The Biden Plan will move blacks/people of color to places of White flight; provide a hotline to snitch on resisters.
Joe Biden on Apartheid South Africa
Joe Biden, Whites will be an ABSOLUE minority in America… that’s a source of our strength.
“Not only our Muslim communities, but our African American communities, Asian communities, Hispanic communities …and the wave still continues. It’s not going to stop; nor should we want it to stop. As a matter of fact, it’s one of the things that we can be most proud of. … so there’s a second thing in that black box: an unrelenting stream of immigration – Non-Stop. Non-Stop. Folks like me who were Caucasian of European descent for the first time in 2017 will be an ABSOLUTE minority in The United States of America. Absolute minority. Fewer than fifty percent of the people in America from then and on will be White European stock. That’s not a bad thing. That’s a source of our strength.”
When reflecting the mess that Victoria Nuland’s operation made of Ukraine, of course Joe Biden’s son, Hunter’s antics there, also come to mind.
Operation Clean Break comes to Ukraine.
…
William F. Buckley, figure of American Conservatism after World War II, defined largely by America’s triumph and the challenge of Soviet communism which would indeed, be brought to an end following the economic pressure of the Reagan administration. In part for faithfulness to Americanism – conservatism of which is conserving liberalism – but decidedly for purging any criticism of Jewry and their weaponization of Americanism, Buckley was controlled opposition.
Leading predecessor of Richard Spencer in the PaleoConservative trajectory, Sam Francis is criticized by WN as he diverts the Jewish question into a critique of “the managerial elite” – the idea of James Burnham (another Marxist convert to Americanism) as to THE problematic group, much the way “THE LEFT” is altercast as the problem nowadays. Attuned to “the managerial class” as the problem, Francis’ brilliance served in the false opposition of PaleoConservatism.
Despite his brilliance, Joe Sobran’s PaleoConservatism facilitated retention of some bad ideas; for example, his support of the Vietnam War and more broadly, his Catholicism. Fellow Catholic and most prominent PaleoConservative, Pat Buchanan, might be shown a book with a counter thesis to his “The Unnecessary War”, responding, take it to Hitler and his war mongering if you want to exercise 20/20 hindsight about who started an unnecessary war.
Sobran, a brilliant writer and early adoptee of PaleoConservativism, is famous in WN circles for his wry angle on Jewry and winding up destitute for that, ousted from his job at National Review by William F. Buckley. Sobran piqued truth and popularity with his remark that “It used to be that an anti-Semite was someone who hated Jews. Now an anti-Semite is someone that Jews hate.”
I never listened to or watched him much at all (never liked him, but sort of below contempt, like fellow 80’s guy, Donald Trump) but all Rush Limbaugh had to do was to conclude a Christmas episode of his 1990s TV show featuring an interracial couple kissing, the shot framed by a vignette heart that closed on them to end the show apparently as if a gift to his critics who accused him of racism. I never watched or listened to him again.
But Limbaugh, despite his being obvious controlled opposition, is remembered by several WN orbiters with surprising fondness – one noted his affinity with PaleoConservatism, Rush having read a Sam Francis article on air in 2017.
Sam Francis deployed the framework of James Burnham, yet another former Marxist, like Leo Strass, Kristol and Meyer. Francis offering the red cape of the “managerial class” as the crucial oppositional group which diverts critical attention from Jewish power and influence and their scattered right wing and liberal minions… whereas it is the Jews who set the agenda, take the initiatives and grease the palms.
A liberal, like Bill Clinton, rests on the same objectivist basis as right wingers. As such he is a pliant tool on behalf of Jewish interests against European Nationalism, as Secretary Albright and General Wesley Clark saw fit. Clinton, just like Joe Biden, maintained that that Whites becoming a minority in The United States is a good thing.
Neoconservatism is much more than just pragmatic political thinking. It is a systematic philosophy with deep philosophical roots. At the core of my book is the claim that the political philosopher Leo Strauss was the most important influence on Irving Kristol’s intellectual development. Neoconservatism reveals for the first time the importance of Kristol’s 1952 review of Strauss’s Persecution and the Art of Writing. Strauss, according to Kristol, had “accomplished nothing less than a revolution in intellectual history, and most of us will—figuratively, at least—have to go back to school to learn the wisdom of the past we thought we knew.”
What did Kristol learn from Leo Strauss?
- There is an unbridgeable chasm between theory and practice, philosophy and the city, the wise few and the vulgar many. That is, there is a radical disjunction between the “realm of theoretical truth” (i.e., the realm inhabited by philosophers) and the “realm of practical moral guidance” (i.e., the realm inhabited by nonphilosophers). What this meant for Strauss is that Platonic idealism is compatible with Machiavellian realism.
- The West is in a state of intellectual and moral decline as seen by the rise of philosophic nihilism. Strauss identified the source of modern nihilism with Enlightenment liberalism—the liberalism of John Locke and Thomas Jefferson. Strauss was a trenchant critic of modern rationalism and science, natural-rights individualism, and laissez-faire capitalism, all of which, he argued, turned man away from a supranatural reality to nature, from faith to reason, from community to the individual, from duty to rights, from inequality to equality, from order to freedom, and from self-sacrifice to self-interest. The result is that man and society have come unhinged from the natural order and from the religious faith necessary to sustain moral and political unity.
- Platonic political philosophy is a necessary antidote to the maladies of modern society. Classical natural right was defined by four principles. First, the political community is the primary unit of moral value, which means the “common good” is the end of the regime and coerced “unity” is the means to that end; second, a truly just political order should mirror the “hierarchic order of man’s natural constitution,” which means that some men are more fit to rule than others; third, that which is naturally right for any given society is always changing depending on necessity and circumstances, which means that philosophic statesmen should not be hampered by conventional morality or the rule of law; and fourth, virtue and the public interest represent the end or purpose of the city, which means that wise statesmen must use “benevolent coercion” to make their citizens virtuous.
- Platonic statesmen should ground the regime on certain ancestral pieties and political myths. The cardinal virtue for the vulgar many is self-sacrifice
PaleoConservatism is actually even worse than NeoConservatism in the long run, because NeoConservatism becomes didactically repugnant in its ‘anything-for-Jews-and-Israel’ ultra pragmatism and nothing-for-Whites hard line; while PaleoConservatism’s fusionism adds a soft peddling of “the traditional moral order”, i.e., the Jewish red cape of our very moral order which is leading to our annihilation.
Related:
Do Joel Davis and Richard Spencer Want to Suck Jewish Cock?
…or would they prefer to take it up the ass?
Tracking Asshole-Head Joel Davis for Complicitness with Jewish power, influence and misdirection.
Speaking of Asshole-Head Joel Davis, he has recently (Sept. 2021) been teaming up with Keith Woods to argue in Justification for Hitler and the Axis against the Marxists and other Allies.
Addendum:
I probably should have included “Neo-Reaction” (NRx) and The Dark Enlightenment” to controlled opposition; but in addition to having always been such obvious (((controlled))), it had been getting less promotion and foolish adherence in the past few years. But with its impresario (((Curtis Yarvin))) making a promotional comeback with an appearance on Tucker Carlson, it bears discussion again. The self proclaimed (((Intellectual Dark Web))) of the (((Weinstein Brothers, Dave Rubin))), et. al. also belongs in this realm – against “The Left”/ for (((objectivity))).
(((The Controlled Opposition of Mencius Moldbug/Curtis Yarvin's Neo-Reaction, NRx))))
14 September 2021
(((Curtis Yarvin))), a.k.a. Mencius Moldbug is back; of “Dark Enlightenment” and “NeoReactionary” (((false opposition))) notoriety, Yarvin has recently appeared on Tucker Carlson and has even had a podcast posted at Mike Enoch Peinovich’s TRS (surprise, surprise – Not).
14 September 2021
(((Curtis Yarvin))), a.k.a. Mencius Moldbug is back; of “Dark Enlightenment” and “NeoReactionary” (((false opposition))) notoriety, Yarvin has recently appeared on Tucker Carlson and has even had a podcast posted at Mike Enoch Peinovich’s TRS (surprise, surprise – Not).
Annoyed by the rather obvious controlled opposition, I never delved deeply into Mencius Moldbug (((Curtis Yarvin))). Fortunately, he’s made his strategy clear, albeit not deliberately, but with a not very clever means of obfuscation.
Like all people following the script of the (((marketing agenda))) against “The Left”, as it serves Jewish power and influence in tandem with White right wing sell outs and liberals eager to take the license of pseudo objectivism, Curtis Yarvin is purporting to be objective and honest in his analysis of history and philosophy. It is basically the same angle generated by (((David Horowitz))) and particularly by (((Paul Gottfried))), as “the Left” that their (((tribe))) had been stewarding into a myriad of anti-White hyperbole, was intersecting potentially disastrously for them if Whites could figure out a White Left Ethnonational position in war of position against them and their right wing and liberal cooperators.
((Curtis Yarvin (mencius moldbug)))’s whole “Dark Enlightenment” was effectively an op against STEM types, to misdirect them as they were in the dark as to how White Post Modernity was supposed to work and were thus susceptible to the (((red caped))) misdirection of Post Modern ideas, wanting to grasp white knuckle to “scientific objectivity” in reaction, “neo reaction.”
It’s a bit of a digression as I was fighting with Al Ross, a Nazi sympathetic commenter at Majorityrights, who, when I corrected him about the misrepresentation/misunderstanding of Poles on horseback to take on Nazi tanks at the beginning of WWII having been the result of American media playing staged Nazi propaganda footage time and again to depict “the beginning of WWII”, turned around in his determination to portray Germany on the right side of the World Wars, and changed the topic to World War I.
Posted by Al Ross on Tue, 14 Sep 2021 04:17 | # Yes Daniel S . My mea culpa , mea maxima culpa . Lethargic Pole yokelry v Germanic IQ was WW 1
Response from DanielS
Ah yes, lethargic Poles and Belgians too, just let the high I.Q. Germans burn down their ancient libraries, cities and kill civilians, etc. Poor Germans, the eternal victims… so aggrieved in the condition of their I.Q., they, the others just cannot understand.. a good selling point if one wants to pander to the predominant White demographics of the USA, anyway.
(((Curtis Yarvin))) will give you an “unbiased” perspective that The Germans were just doing what they had to do, what was normal, or so his German wife, blonde mischling kids, and divide and conquer strategy of kissing German ass would have it (Yarvin, who claims to be White, quotes A.P. Taylor as if a credible historian; Yarvin also quotes Goebbels who said “the truth is the best propaganda”, while Goebbels was never averse to a big lie himself. Nor A.P. Taylor who quotes, as if true, Goebbels vast lie that Poles killed 53,000 German civilians interwar; an exponentialized figure that Hitler proposed); a divide and conquer strategy of Germanophilic (((pandering))) shared by (((Paul Gottfried)))(Mr. “we need an Alternative Right” to counter “The” left (i.e. to disorganize and divide would-be White Left Ethnonationalism in its potential war of position against Jewish hegemony and complicit White right wingers and liberals); (((David Horowitz))) (Mr. I am no longer one of those horrible “Leftist” Cultural Marxists); (((David Cole Stein))) (((Mr. I am a proud German Jew and I hate Slavic Jews; and there is no Prussian blue colors on the walls at Auschwitz) and to some extent (((Gilad Atzmon))) (Mr. I hate Israel, sympathize with Germans and basically think the world should be a borderless liberal jazz fest against a veneer of pseudo Heideggerism).
But you know, (((Yarvin))) “proves” that he is unbiased in his take by suggesting that Hitler was gay, and that he has nothing to gain in taking that “bold’ position.
It is rather the case that Hitler’s idol, Frederick the Great, was a homo… maybe sought to prove his manhood by stealing the Polish land that Hitler was aggrieved to have seen returned by the Versailles treaty; while an entire Jewish media, operating in an indifferent market abets the myth that Germany necessarily suffered injustice in the way Versailles drew the borders; veritably always beginning history at 1919.
Yes, the lethargic Poles, it took their cryptographers until sometime in the early 1930s to crack Enigma, the Nazi secret coding machine.
Milo panders to Richard Spencer’s right wing altercast, later makes clandestine recording of the would-be Fuhrer
This old post that I published at Majorityrights in 2013 goes to show how intransigently stupid in their clinging to the (((red cape))) of the left and altercast to right wing reaction that right wingers have been – it should have been obvious that long ago: https://majorityrights.com/weblog/comments/david_mamets_fraud_conservatism
