O.J. Simpson’s Giddy Parole Board Hearing
Connie Bisbee is Chairman of the Nevada Board of Parole. She addressed killer O.J. Simpson with giddy smiles at his parole hearing. In this moment (22:48 of the clip) she fawns over Simpson after accidentally citing his age as “90” – she gushed gleefully toward the murderer, Simpson, “that he looks great for 90.” Is it any surprise that killer O.J. got parole with the likes of her presiding?
Simpson should not have been able to touch Nicole Brown in the first place.
The story of Simpson beating Nicole because she was disturbing him with complaints about Simpson having sex with another woman in another room in the house is a particularly graphic example of black hyper-assertiveness. And a problem with White women in that regard – the allure of sheer confidence to them, which, overweening in blacks, apparently can become like a drug to some women; causing them to ignore if not forgive all manner of destruction in order to have that fix.
Black women’s hatred of White women, especially when they take their black men:
WN ought to take advantage of the reality and make it known to mudsharks that they will be on their own when confronted by this hatred from black women. No White knighting, good riddance to you when YOU face the consequences of black hyper-assertiveness. We do not generally seek to join you in reciprocal race betrayal, depriving black men of their natural partners.
People who know about Stacy Abrams understand that she hates Whites – won’t even bother trying to pick up White liberal votes anymore; said that was what caused her to narrowly lose the Georgia election. Next time she won’t make that mistake and she’ll win (because blacks don’t vote like Whites, they vote strictly for their own kind irrespective of issues, if the choice is between a black and White candidate).
Only White women are deluded enough to believe that their universal “sisterhood”, including with black women, is a stronger bond than with their brothers, fathers, cousins and extended racial family. The O.J. Simpson jury which acquitted Simpson of murder is a classic example. The black women on that jury had no loyalty to the “White sisters.” In fact, they typically hate White women especially when they take black men, and especially when taking wealthy and accomplished black men like O.J. Simpson, as Nicole Brown did.
Attorney Holly von Roark referred to this in discussion with Dennis Dale. She observed that Christopher Darden should have told Marge Clarke that having black women on the Simpson jury would work decidedly against their prosecution.
O.J. Simpson & Nicole Brown’s Alleles Combined
Irrefutable trail of blood: Vincent Bugliosi vs. O.J. Simpson (“ABSOLUTELY 100% GUILTY”) (1999)
(Part 2) (Bugliosi’s “FINAL SUMMATION” to the jury).
O.J. Simpson, typical black behavior and typical Jewish facilitation.
NPR, “The Perfect Perversity of the O.J. Simpson Case”, 14 June 2016:
There is no doubt that OJ Simpson committed the murders.
There were signs from the very first date he had with the 18 year old Nicole Brown that OJ Simpson was violent.
Brown’s friend had noticed signs that Simpson had forced himself upon her in the first date..he had ripped open her pants…
The series reveals many other facts not previously well known about the case:
Another 9-11 call from Nicole has a policeman arrive. Brown tells the policeman emphatically that Simpson is going to kill her. Brown has a bruise on her face and Simpson tells the policeman that he doesn’t care, he doesn’t want her in his bed, he has two other women.
The policeman tells Simpson that he is under arrest for domestic violence. Simpson goes into his house, ostensibly to get dressed, but races away in his car via a rear exit. The police pursue, but don’t catch him and don’t pursue him afterward.
This is one of the surprising elements of the series: The L.A. Police Department was not eager to prosecute Simpson. They treated him with kid gloves.
The detective who interviewed Simpson after the murder did not ask him to provide a time line of his day – which would have caught him in several lies – basically, because the detective was following The L.A. P.D.‘s tendency to treat Simpson and his celebrity with deference.
In fact, detective on the case, Mark Fuhrman, in being racial himself, was an outlier to this culture. He actually had sued the L.A. Police Department for early retirement, claiming psychological disability because he could not stand having to deal with blacks.
The L.A.P.D. won the case against Fuhrman, was not compelled to accept his claim, and told him to get back to work.
Unfortunately for the case against Simpson, Fuhrman was the one who collected Simpson’s glove left at the scene of the murder.
Simpson was advised to stop taking his arthritis medicine so that his hands would swell up. When the glove didn’t fit Simpson’s hand in a demonstration before the jury, it added to the suggestion that Fuhrman’s racism might motivate him to set-up Simpson – a Negro man in an interracial relationship which Fuhrman was known to not like – prosecuting him unjustly by planting the glove as fake evidence.
Allowing Simpson to try-on the glove was one of black prosecuting attorney Christopher Darden’s blunders; the other mentioned before, allowing the jury to be populated by black women.
“If it doesn’t fit you must acquit” was Simpson’s black defense attorney, Johnny Cochran’s famous line, but what was most important in the acquittal was the way he successfully pandered to a majority black jury, Jewish legal system and zeitgeist, by diverting them from the obvious evidence against O.J. Simpson, into “juicestice” instead, presenting the case as an indictment of Furhman and the L.A. Police Department’s early stage ‘Hitleresque’ will to genocide, racism and cover-up of its racism – a particularly effective argument in L.A. following the Rodney King incident.
Reginald Denny, beaten FAR worse in retaliation for the Rodney King beating.
Key excerpts from Johnny Corchran’s closing argument:
Stop this cover-up. Stop this cover-up. If you don’t stop it, then who? Do you think the police department is going to stop it? Do you think the D.A.‘s office is going to stop it? Do you think we can stop it by ourselves? It has to be stopped by you. And you know, they talked about Fuhrman, they talked about him in derisive tones now, and that is very fashionable now, isn’t it? Everybody wants to beat up on Fuhrman, the favored whipping boy in America. I told you I don’t take any delight in that because you know before this trial started, if you grow up in this country, you know there are Fuhrmans out there. You learn early on in your life that you are not going to be naive, that you love your country, but you know it is not perfect, so you understand that, so it is no surprise to me, but I don’t take any pride in it. But for some of you, you are finding out the other side of life. You are finding out—that is why this case is so instructive. You are finding out about the other side of life, but things aren’t always as they seem. It is not just rhetoric, it is the actions of people, it is the lack of courage and it is a lack of integrity at high places. That is what we are talking about here.
[Ibid. Johnny Corchran’s closing argument] I don’t know how this subject was raised but officer Fuhrman says that when he sees a Nigger, as he called it, driving with a white woman, he would pull them over. I asked what if he didn’t have a reason and he said that he would find one. I looked at the two marines to see if they knew he was joking, but it became obvious to me that he was very serious.” Now, let me just stop at this point. Let’s back it up a minute, Mr. Harris. Pull it back down, please. If he sees an African American with a white woman he would stop them. If he didn’t have a reason, he would find one or make up one. This man will lie to set you up. That is what he is saying there. He would do anything to set you up because of the hatred he has in his heart. A racist is somebody who has power over you, who can do something to you. People could have views but keep them to themselves, but when they have power over you, that is when racism becomes insidious. That is what we are talking about here. He has power. A police officer in the street, a patrol officer, is the single most powerful figure in the criminal justice system. He can take your life. Unlike the supreme court, you don’t have to go through all these appeals. He can do it right there and justify it. And that is why, that is why this has to be routed out in the LAPD and every place. Make up a reason because he made a judgment. That is what happened in this case. They made a judgment. Everything else after that is going to point toward O.J. Simpson. They didn’t want to look at anybody else. Mr. Darden asked who did this crime? That is their job as the police. We have been hampered. They turned down our offers for help. But that is the prosecution’s job. The judge says we don’t have that job. The law says that. We would love to help do that. Who do you think wants to find these murderers more than Mr. Simpson? But that is not our job; it is their job. And when they don’t talk to anybody else, when they rush to judgment in their obsession to win, that is why this became a problem. This man had the power to carry out his racist views and that is what is so troubling. Let’s move on. Making up a reason. That is troubling. That is frightening. That is chilling. But if that wasn’t enough, if that wasn’t enough, the thing that really gets you is she goes on to say: “Officer Fuhrman went on to say that he would like nothing more than to see all niggers gathered together and killed. He said something about burning them or bombing them. I was too shaken to remember the exact words he used. However, I do remember that what he said was probably the most horrible thing I had ever heard someone say. What frightened me even more was that he was a police officer sworn to uphold the law.” And now we have it. There was another man, not too long ago in the world, who had those same views who wanted to burn people, who had racist views and ultimately had power over people in this country.
People didn’t care. People said he was just crazy, he is just a half-baked painter. They didn’t do anything about it. This man, this scourge, became one of the worse people in the history of this world, Adolph Hitler, because people didn’t care or didn’t try to stop him. He had the power over his racism and his anti-religion. Nobody wanted to stop him, and it ended up in world war ii, the conduct of this man. And so Fuhrman, Fuhrman wants to take all black people now and burn them or bomb them. That is genocidal racism. Is that ethnic purity? What is that? What is that? We are paying this man’s salary to espouse these views? Do you think he only told Kathleen Bell whom he just had met? Do you think he talked to his partners about it? Do you think commanders knew about it? Do you think everybody knew about it and turned their heads? Nobody did anything about it.
Reaction to the “innocent verdict”: O.J. Simpson, typical black behavior (dindu) and typical Jewish enabling. The glove trick was the idea of Shapiro (in background). F. Lee Baily, O.J. Simpson and Johnny Corchran, react in foreground.
In what is supposed to be prosecuting attorney Marcia Clark’s “closing argument” against the eminently guilty O.J. Simpson (who is merely one expression of pervasive black hyper-assertion, social irresponsibility and violence that needs to be defended against), Clark instead makes it a key point to condemn and condemn ultimately, Mark Fuhrman, a dedicated, competent and fair, career police detective:
Let me come back to Mark Fuhrman for a minute. Did he lie when he testified here in this courtroom saying that he did not use racial epithets in the last ten years? Yes. Is he a racist? Yes. Is he the worst L.A. P.D. has to offer? Yes. Do we wish that this person was never hired by the L.A. P.D.? Yes. Should L.A. P.D. have ever hired him? No. Should such a person be a police officer? No. In fact, do we wish there was no such person on the planet? Yes.
This “closing argument” by Marcia Clark is unbelievably perverted – she devoted 41 seconds (1/4th) of her 2:44 second long closing argument to condemning, and condemning ultimately, Mark Furhman, for the innate and necessary capacity that all species have to discriminate on behalf of their own survival – she even explicitly denounces Furhrman’s very existence.
Marcia Clark’s lawyering efforts were thoroughly co-opted by Jewish, anti-White purposes of destroying Whites.
Anti-racism is a Jewish construct that capitalizes on Cartesianism’s rational blindness to prejudices, to the fact that its prescribed universalistic way of treating the world is not innocent, that it is hurting and it is killing people – it is a disingenuous weaponization that targets Whites, heir naïve complicity to forego their capacity to classify social group patterns and discriminate as necessary, accordingly, in their defense.
29 April 1992, during black riots: Blacks pulled Reginald Denny from his truck passing through the riot areas, and then celebrate after having thrown a brick full force, point blank into his head. This was far worse than the incident which sparked the riots, a baton beating that police administered to physically resistant Rodney King, who had been apprehended after a dangerous, high-speed car chase.
I could spend the rest of my life citing cases of the destruction that comes about when “our team” is composed of universal mercenaries, from any racial group, let alone from another town, region, city or nation…
The only thing to do in address of this problem then, is to continue to cite salient examples…
“Do you like white women? Because we have a lot of them at Baylor, and they love football players.”
Washington Post, “Baylor moves to dismiss lawsuit alleging 52 rapes by 31 football players”, 29 March 2017:
Baylor moved Tuesday to dismiss a federal lawsuit filed in January filed by a former student who claimed to have been gang-raped by a pair of football players in 2013. In addition, her complaint alleged 52 “acts of rape” committed by the school’s football players between 2011 and 2014.
Those numbers were far higher than the eye-opening figures cited by school regents from the report of an outside law firm, which found that 17 women had reported 19 incidents of sexual or domestic assault by Baylor football players since 2011. However, in its court filing Tuesday, Baylor said it “does not agree with or concede the accuracy of Plaintiff’s 146-paragraph complaint and its immaterial and inflammatory assertions.”
“Baylor moves to dismiss Plaintiff’s assault, failure to investigate, and negligence claims because they are barred by the two-year statute of limitations,” stated the document, filed with a U.S. District Court that includes Baylor’s home of Waco, Tex., in its jurisdiction. The move to dismiss also claimed that the allegations of the woman, referred to as Elizabeth Doe, “do not rise to the level of ‘deliberate indifference.’ ”
Doe alleged in her complaint that on April 18, 2013 — an annual date known as “Diadeloso” (“Day of the Bear”) at Baylor and marked by a lack of classes and an encouragement of social interaction — she was raped by two freshman football players, Tre’Von Armstead and Shamycheal Chatman, and that Baylor ignored the situation. She also claimed that her position as a member of the school’s female recruiting team, called the Baylor Bruins, contributed to the incident.
“Baylor’s recruiting policies and practices, along with the Baylor Bruin football hostess program, directly contributed to the creation of a culture of sexual violence that permeated Baylor and from which Ms. Doe would soon suffer,” the lawsuit stated.
The lawsuit also contended that Kendal Briles, a former assistant football coach and son of former head coach Art Briles, told a recruit, “Do you like white women? Because we have a lot of them at Baylor, and they love football players.”
[Art Briles says he ‘did not cover up any sexual violence’ at Baylor]
“While broadly and needlessly impugning the integrity of the many female students who honorably participated in the Bruins organization, Plaintiff does not allege that she herself was ever asked by any Baylor official, directly or indirectly, to participate in the ‘good time’ recruiting policy that she claims to have existed,” Baylor said Tuesday, “nor does she claim that her alleged assault occurred in conjunction with any recruiting activity.”
More broadly, the lawsuit claimed that “Baylor football players were responsible for … the most widespread culture of sexual violence and abuse of women ever reported in a collegiate athletic program,” adding, “Baylor football under Briles had run wild, in more ways than one, and Baylor was doing nothing to stop it.”
“Although Baylor appreciates the sensitivity and seriousness of the issue of sexual assault — a fact demonstrated by its voluntary release of the Pepper Hamilton investigation findings in May 2016 — Plaintiff’s inflammatory and immaterial allegations must be disregarded when evaluating whether Plaintiff has stated a claim,” the university said in Tuesday’s filing.
Former Baylor football player Tre’Von Armstead arrested on sexual assault charges.
Armstead and Chatman were arrested last week and indicted in connection with the 2013 incident. Another former Baylor football player, Sam Ukwuachu, had a sexual-assault conviction overturned last week by a Texas appeals court, with the case remanded for retrial. Two other ex-Bears, Tevin Elliott and Shawn Oakman, have been convicted of and indicted on rape charges, respectively, in an ongoing scandal that has cost the jobs of Briles and other senior Baylor officials and spawned numerous lawsuits.
On Friday, lawyers for 10 women (in addition to Doe) who are suing Baylor for its alleged indifference to their rapes by football players filed notice to subpoena materials from Pepper Hamilton’s investigation into the school. “It’s long past time for the truth of how senior administrators discouraged and retaliated against the young women for reporting sexual assault,” Jim Dunnam, one of the lawyers, said Monday (via the Waco Tribune-Herald).
“We’ll never have transparency until they stop saying this was just a football problem,” he added. “Every time they say it is just a football problem is further victimization of the over 100 young women who were wronged that had nothing to do with football.”
Baylor’s Kim Mulkey: “Knock Parents Concerned About Sexual Assault Scandal ‘Right In The Face.”
DeadSpin, “Baylor’s Kim Mulkey: Knock Parents Concerned About Sexual Assault Scandal ‘Right In The Face”, 25 Feb 2017:
Today was senior day for the Baylor women’s basketball team, and rather than spending her time at the mic focused solely on her soon-departing players, head coach Kim Mulkey took a different route.
The storied coach decided to share a few choice words for parents voicing concern over sending their daughters to a place currently being sued for allowing and enabling football players to commit an alleged 52 sexual assaults in four years. Or rather, she shared some instructions for the fans—who cheered her both during and after her speech—telling them that if a parent tells them they won’t let their daughter attend Baylor, they should “knock them right in the face.”
NBCDFW, “Baylor Football Player Convicted of Sexual Assault in Waco”, 21 Aug 2015:
Sam Ukwuachu sentenced to 180 days in jail and 10 years of probation
Ibid: A jury in Texas district court found 22-year-old Sam Ukwuachu guilty Thursday of one count of sexual assault. The one-time All-America who transferred to play football at Baylor University has been sentenced to 180 days in jail and given 10 years of probation Friday for sexually assaulting a fellow student athlete in 2013.
Prosecutors said Ukwuachu sexually assaulted a former Baylor women’s soccer player at his Waco apartment. Ukwuachu has said the encounter was consensual.
Daily Beast, “Baylor Football’s Shawn Oakman Investigated for Rape”, 17 April 2016:
Police are investigating sexual-assault allegations against Shawn Oakman, a former Baylor defensive end and NFL draft hopeful.
Police are investigating sexual assault allegations made against NFL draft hopeful and former Baylor University football player Shawn Oakman, after a woman reported that he raped her over the weekend.
[…]
Two other former Baylor football players, Tevin Elliott and Sam Ukwuachu, have both been convicted—in 2014 and 2015, respectively—of sexual assaults on female students in separate cases. In his trial, Elliott was convicted on two counts of sexual assault and sentenced to 20 years in prison, and witnesses during his trial claimed that he may have assaulted as many as four women, according to the Waco Tribune. The other women’s cases were not independently reported or tried in court. After Ukwuachu’s conviction, he was controversially only sentenced to six months in jail, with 10 years of probation to follow.
[…]
BlackSportsOnline, “Victim’s Photos of Shawn Oakman’s Alleged Domestic Violence Released”, 6 June 2016:
Shawn Oakman is currently accused of raping a woman, but back in 2013 he was accused of domestic violence against his girlfriend at the time.
She never pressed charges and Oakman wasn’t punished by Baylor.
TMZ has obtained photos of her injuries from the alleged attack. She accused of Oakman of shoving up up against walls and cabinets in the apartment.
CBS, “Ex-Baylor University player Shamychel “Myke” Chatman arrested on sexual assault charges”, 27 Mar 2017:
…
Erica's Story
…
Worst seats at The Final Four
….
How to Fight Anti-Semitic Trolls and Bigotry Online
..another example. Someone Tweeted at me, ‘why are Jews so weak, and bad at sports?’
Now, does this guy actually believe it? I doubt it. He just thought that it would get me angry. uhmm. but..
What it actually was a fastball down the middle.
And so, I just excerpted his Tweet and said, well, of course Jews don’t really participate in athletics – that’s what we use to divert the energy of the gentiles while we take over the systems of power.
The message to take away from the Buffalo shooting. Get out of the right! Get out of its futile reactionary tactics! Don’t sacrifice your life!
Here is what the ultra anti-White bigots of (((NPR))) have to say:
https://www.npr.org/2022/05/15/1099028397/buffalo-shooting-what-we-know
16 Aug 2021
Duke and Flattery show
Correcting Tucker Carlson’s deflection from Jewish power and influence as a cause (in relation to news stories of late):
http://renseradioarchives.com/archives/dduke/081621.mp3
To date, Tulsi seemed as if she was at least not joining in the program of hating White people.
Blacks celebrate guilty, guilty, guilty verdict.