Kosher Chutzpah & White Hubris: Dialectical Metapolitik Over Ethnonational Coordination
Putin cleaned up the Jewish oligarchs, did he? Or did rather those who facilitated his ascent to power remain in tact, like Roman Abramovich, who was in fact instrumental in Putin’s take-over.
Some 80% of the “Russian Oligarchs” are Jewish (an investigation of the “Russian mafia” would likely find a similar Pareto rule of Jewish vast over representation).
Yaroslav Trofimov @yarotrof 21 April 2022
To the chants of Allahu Akbar, the city once founded by Greeks fleeing the Ottoman Empire was “liberated” of its inhabitants by Putin’s Chechen militias. What a twist of history.
@maxseddon
Russia’s “liberation” of Mariupol looks like this for Ramzan Kadyrovhttps://twitter.com/yarotrof/status/1517205508775723008
Video corroborates the hypothesis that the Eastern regions of Ukraine were inhabited by Ukrainians before the Holodomor, after which Russians moved in to populate and man the industrialization of the area.
15 March update:
It has been the position here, from the onset of Putin’s attack on Ukraine, that Zelensky should be called upon to step down or taken out and Putin be humored by being allowed to install his puppet regime – similar as Lukashenko in Belarus.
This would have, would still, save lives, infrastructure and national treasure while not engaging the danger of escalating destruction that could bring other nations into greater cataclysm.
The Ukrainian people would survive to fight over the long haul, with the world now galvanized behind their ethnonational cause, modeling the liberation of our cause, not just theirs specifically.
Zelensky, apparently an expression of “Operation Clean Break” (a.k.a., PNAC), is not acting the careful, organic way that a Ukrainian man would act, in the interests of Ukrainian people, but rather calling upon them to fight to the death in hopes of exhausting Russia’s army in a way that Hitler’s armies could not. Zelensky is not acting like a Ukrainian man because he is Not a Ukrainian man.
His best chances at victory would drag the west into the war – war, a Jew harvest, it’s been said.
None of this excuses the imperialist kleptocratic Putin what so ever; what he is doing is evil, i.e., he does not have to do this; in true right wing reaction he has sold out, been manipulated by kosher ideology and interests, swept along with fellow oligarchic travelers flattered in hubris to betray ethnonational coordination in favor of his kleptocratic imperialism.
However, especially with his hand exposed and the world against him, the Ukrainian ethnonational cause is positioned to play a long term game to re-take its sovereignty; whereas following the Neo-Con and Neo-Liberal call for hot war, or the ever expanding franchise of “liberal democracy”, will not increase the chances of Ukraine’s ethnonational and democratic homeostasis; on the contrary, it will vastly increase its chances of destruction.
Temporarily enduring the indignity and the martyrdom of few in a Lukashenko-like fiasco is a small price to pay in order to save lives, the Ukrainian people in tact, as a people, pubic and private property in tact, remaining to do things the right way, the left ethnonational way, over the long haul: to establish Ukrainian ethnonational correctivity, thereby homeostasis, thus autonomy and sovereignty through this paradigmatic conservatism, i.e. the correctively of democratic-like feedback process delimited and structured by its ethnonational bounds and accountable as such to coordinate with other nations in human and pervasive ecology.
We ethnonationalists, left ethnonationalists, can begin to conceive of negotiating the contraction of Russia into a coordinating ethnonationalism, rather than an imperialist kleptocracy, by working not just with those of the west who truly care about European genetic interests, but also with the East, markedly Japan and Korea, to make purchases of the Russian Federation’s eastern territories; and to help Russia in developing its autonomous manufacturing base.
Update: Fr. Raphael Johnson, “The Orthodox Nationalist”, claims that Western supported forces, markedly Ukraine’s Azov Battalion has targeted civilian populations in the Russian populated eastern provinces of Ukraine, over the better part of a decade killing some 14,000 people, in addition to imposing measures against Russian language and culture. Furthermore, he claims that the development of bio-weapons and the continual creep toward NATO and NeoLiberal alliance in western Ukraine justifies Putin’s war against the entirety of Ukraine. Johnson is wrong. At most, Putin should have moved troops into the two western provinces; and the Russian case made from there.
But even worse for Johnson’s (and Putin)’s case, is that the death toll that Johnson cites is apparently over 90% military combatants, not civilians; and apparently collateral victims of bombardments in the main, where civilian, not deliberate targets. True, these figures come from (((Wikipedia))), so need a doubling down in verification, but if remotely true, it greatly mitigates against Putin’s already dubious case for entering Ukraine beyond these provinces.
While not tending to illustrate the obnoxious assertiveness of the Russian separatists, right wing media adjacent with WN’s anti-American bias, does argue for the obnoxious escalatory response of the Ukrainian side (1:07), the anti-Russian separatists, from impractical efforts to enforce Ukrainian language in the day-to-day to the occasional atrocity committed (and officially condemned of their own leadership) by anti-Russian zealots.
| Breakdown | Fatalities | Time period | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| TOTAL | 13,100–13,300 killed | 6 April 2014 – 31 January 2021 | United Nations[9] |
| TOTAL | 14,000 killed | 6 April 2014 – 13 May 2021 | Ukrainian government[10] |
| Civilians | 3,393 killed (312 foreign) | 6 April 2014 – 30 September 2021 | United Nations[11] |
| UAF, NGU and volunteer forces | 4,641 killed[note 1] | 6 April 2014 – 23 February 2022 | Museum of Military History[7][12][13] |
| DPR and LPR forces | 5,795 killed | 6 April 2014 – 23 February 2022 | United Nations, DPR & LPR[9][14][15] |
| Russian Armed Forces | 400–500 killed[note 2] | 6 April 2014 – 10 March 2015 | US State Department[16] |
…
The significance of the Donbas
The Donbas is Ukraine’s industrial heartland. But its coal-based economy is a heavily-subsidized millstone for Ukraine, not a powerhouse, no matter how important its arms exports might be to the Russian military.
This video presents motivations for war for the perspective of Russian populations under siege, in particular in the Eastern Ukrainian provinces and coming from Azov Battalions (Neo Nazis).
As such, there are a couple of issues to be teased apart, observing the culpable, which this platform, dnanations, does clearly better than any other.
The NeoNazi Banderas, Azov Battalion troops, are operating as all neo Nazis do, under natural fallacy, “might makes right”, “life is war” world view with a deficiency of accountability to praxis and correctivity as such. Rigidly reactionary and lacking the means of corrective homeostasis, they are used, deployed as it were by a tandem of right wingers who do not care much about the broad praxis (neither Russian nor Ukrainian), but rather their self serving ideals; and Jewry facilitates this pugnaciousness, for its own interests and uncaring of European praxis. Thus, a Viktoria Nuland will, indeed facilitate the Azov pugnaciousness toward the Russian majority provinces and it is wrong.
However trite as it may sound, two wrongs don’t make a right; and Putin, in right wing, might makes right reaction himself, facilitated himself by his own Kosher Oligarchy, political and religious minions, is not right to perpetrate a war against the rest of Ukraine. His most legitimate move would have been to move overwhelming Russian troops into the Eastern provinces and then undertake procedures to prosecute those responsible for the reckless violence against the break away regions. /With the exception of the Odessa incident in 2014, The Ukrainians, Azov or other, were not attack Russians; therefor it has been largely a territorial dispute, which Russia may have resolved simply by taking control of the eastern regions as a new part of Russia.
The whole incident of the war illustrates the importance of this platform, dnanations, in parsing out Jewish power and influence and no account, right wing reactionaries, who will take bribes with little regard for the broad praxis (fomenting their Neo Nazi elements, easily instigated to go over the top, as it were) and liberals/neoliberals, personally short on accountability and concern for the deep human ecologies that would be protected by ethnonationalism (the liberals are easily diverted and placated with license and licentiousness to open our borders and bounds).
It is the working hypothesis on this platform that the kosher folks have evolved expertise at maintaining group organization and advocacy and disrupting that of others. With particularly good verbal skills in that end, they have often been able to put forth compelling arguments that captivate vast audiences, as in the case of Marxism. Its group advocacy was held to be the workers of the world, unionized and in coalition to prevail over a withered away state and taking over the means of production. For all its rhetoric against imperialism then, its ideology set forth an imperialist kleptocratic logic of meaning and action; for all of communism’s fancy talk of “nascent polycentrism”, centralized planning by the way of the supreme Soviet maintained brutal control over ethnonational independence where it could extend its power and influence.
Directly on its Western flank, the distinct history of Belarusian ethnonationalism was crushed. It’s fledgling independence upon the dissolution of the Soviet Union was short lived, before NeoSoviet Puppet, Aleksander Lukashenko was installed. Ukraine was, if anything, even more important to the Soviet Union, for its fertile lands and strategic seaports via the Black Sea. It was doing better than Belarus in terms of its independence following the dissolution of the Soviet Union, though not able to join the EU or Nato, despite the wishes of some of its up and coming figures against the fears of the Russian imperialist (Neo Soviet, in respect of his imperialist spheres of interest), Vladimir Putin – a KGB agent insider, steeped in Soviet ardency, he was stationed in its Western most buffer-zone, East Germany, during the times just before and ending with the dissolution of the Soviet Union to his dismay.
“The collapse of the soviet union was the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the 20the century”
Now then, while this platform maintains that the kosher folks are the best organized and group attentive to set the agendas, grease the palms and take the initiatives – markedly in the case of Ukraine, Victoria Nuland and her husband, Robert Kagan, they are a small group numerically, which depend upon Whites (in the case of White nations) who will take the payoffs in the case of rightwing/neoliberal pandering or the license and licentiousness in the case of more straight forward liberal incentivization (but while taking for granted the flattered objectivist underpinnings, either way, as right wingers/neoliberals or more straight forward liberals, they are conveniently short on social accountability to ethnonational bearing and coordination : enter Putin and Biden.
In order to help make sense of the causes of this war, and chart a potential course to navigate out of it in ethnonational remedy, I provide this brief history in overview of the, lets call it “dialectical metapolik,” of these elitists, who believe that they are above the human and pervasive ecology of ethnonationalism and its coordination.
“PEARL OF PRZEMYSL”
Restaurant at the Przemysl train station that’s been in the news so much lately as it transits Ukrainian refugees from Putin’s war.
28 February 2022
On February 24 Russia’s Vladimir Putin launched an attack on Ukraine to bring it under control of the imperial Russian Federation, for fear that it’s security and vital sphere of interests would be threated by Ukraine becoming a new member of NATO, falling under the antagonistic influences of Western NeoLiberal and NeoCon influences as well as Ukraine’s ultra-nationalist, radical NeoNazi element.
I will not exaggerate this NeoNazi element as Putin certainly has in his speech to justifying the invasion ot “liberate Ukraine from the Nazis, though a Nazi element does exist in legacy of Bandera, unashamed of his mass murder of whole Polish villages, men, women and children, let alone opposition to Russia, particularly with its own manifestations of mass murder. That’s just to note that there is this Nazi element among Ukrainian ultra Nationalists, particularly in the West of Ukraine; and while it is small in number, its rigidity and fervor, like all right wing reactionaries, can and has been exploited as shock troops, by the kosher folks and those right wingers/ neoliberals happy to take the pay off in their wake: war is a Jew harvest, but not only.
Gennady Nikolayevich Timchenko; born 9 November 1952) is a Russian oligarch and billionaire businessman.[2] He founded and owns the private investment group, Volga Group. Previously he was a co-owner of Gunvor Group.
Timchenko has been close friends with Russian leader Vladimir Putin since the early 1990s.[3][4] In 1991, Putin gave Timchenko an oil export license.[3] Timchenko subsequently founded Gunvor, which would go on to export billions of dollars-worth of Russian oil.[3]
He serves on the board of trustees of the Jewish Museum and Tolerance Center in Moscow[75] and the Board of Trustees of the Russian Geographical Society.[76]
Irish Times, 29 Aug, 1998, Russia Bows to the ‘Rule of Seven Bankers”
The link between power and finance grew tighter in 1995, when Yeltsin approved a project called “loans for shares,” which involved a swap: The bankers loaned money to the cash-strapped government in exchange for shares in some of Russia’s lucrative enterprises. If the government failed to pay back the loans, the bankers could sell off the companies, and they did – to themselves. Many of the auctions were rigged from the inside.
Potanin was one of the biggest winners. His bank, Uneximbank, got Norilsk Nickel, one of the world’s largest producers of nickel, cobalt and platinum group metals. He also won an oil company, Sidanko, and the Novolipetsk Metallurgical. Khodorkovsky snared Yukos, Russia’s second-biggest oil company. Berezovsky got Sibneft, another large oil company. Separately, over the next two years, the moguls also gained control over most of Russia’s mass media.
In the run-up to the 1996 election, the tycoons contributed millions of dollars to Yeltsin’s re-election campaign, spurred on by Berezovsky, who later boasted that the seven members of the club controlled half of Russia’s economy. It was an overstatement but reflected their hubris.
After the election, according to several sources, the tycoons met and decided to insert one of their own into government. They debated who – and chose Potanin, who became deputy prime minister. One reason they choose Potanin was that he is not Jewish, and most of the rest of them are, and feared a backlash against the Jewish bankers.
Sechin has been a confidante of Russian leader Vladimir Putin since the early 1990s. Sechin was chief of staff to Putin when he was the deputy mayor of St. Petersburg in 1994. When Putin became President in 2000, Sechin became his deputy chief of staff, overseeing security services and energy issues in Russia.[3][4] Putin appointed Sechin as chairman of Rosneft, the Russian state oil company in 2004.[5][4] He was as Deputy Prime Minister of Russia in Vladimir Putin‘s cabinet from 2008 to 2012.[6] He is currently the chief executive officer, president and chairman of the management board of Rosneft.[5]
Rosneft has played a major role in the history of Russia’s oil industry. The first use of the name Rosneft dates back to the late 19th century, when exploration of oil fields in Sakhalin began in 1889. Most of Rosneft’s current assets were established during the Soviet era.[4]
Rex Tillerson, the businessman picked by Donald Trump to be the next US secretary of state, is the long-time director of a US-Russian oil firm based in the tax haven of the Bahamas, leaked documents show.
Tillerson – the chief executive of ExxonMobil – has been a director of the oil company’s Russian subsidiary, Exxon Neftegas, since 1998. His name – RW Tillerson – appears next to other officers who are based at Houston in Texas; Moscow; and Sakhalin, in Russia’s remote Far East.
The leaked 2001 document comes from the corporate registry in the Bahamas. It was one of 1.3m files given to Germany’s Süddeutsche Zeitung by an anonymous source. The registry is public but details of individual directors are typically incomplete or missing entirely.
Though there is nothing untoward about this directorship, it has not been reported before and is likely to raise fresh questions over Tillerson’s relationship with Russia ahead of a potentially stormy confirmation hearing by the US senate foreign relations committee.
ExxonMobil’s use of offshore regimes – while legal – may also jar with Trump’s avowal to put “America first”.
Tillerson’s critics say he is too close to president Vladimir Putin – and that his appointment could raise potential conflicts of interest.
ExxonMobil is the world’s largest oil company and has for a long time been eyeing Russia’s vast oil and gas deposits. Tillerson currently has Exxon stock worth more than $200m.
If Japan were in control of Sakhalin, an island to its north, and a logical extension of its homeland, its ethno-state, and if Japan and its closely related Asian relatives were in control of their native lands of Kamchatka and Eastern Siberia, not only would Japan and its Asian relatives be in rightful control of lands that are a natural part of their ethno-states; instead of these territories being of the vast imperial aggrandizement of The Russian Federation; but instead of The Russian Federation extending its practice of aggrandizement and parasitism of the resources of aggrandized territories, Japan would have the natural gas resource that goes with its rightful north island, which could largely solve immediate critical problems of its energy requirements – resources so urgently needed, alleviating options heretofore so limited by the territorial impingement, that it was forced to take extra risks with nuclear power precisely as it was deprived of traditional fossil fuel sources; but persevered in its characteristic self reliance to place the Fukushima nuclear reactor within its constrained and populated national territory despite that obviously being far from optimal. Disaster betrayed that pattern of self reliance while the imperialist parasitism of Putin’s Russian Federation has been ramped-up with outrageous chutzpah, in alliance with Trump and Netanyahu – against Asian ethno-nationalism and its emerging alliances with European ethno-states.
If Vladimir Putin has a man crush on anyone in business, it’s probably Rex Tillerson, the ExxonMobil chief executive Rex Tillerson Trump just nominated to head the State Department.
Aljazeera, ‘New US state chief a perfect fit for Russia’, 14 Dec 2016:
Friendship between Putin and Rex Tillerson dates back to 1990s when the Texas oilman established a US energy presence.
As to the reason why, all you need to do is look at Sakhalin, a windswept, earthquake-prone island off Russia’s Pacific coast where temperatures can fluctuate 110 degrees throughout the year. It’s this forbidding territory that Exxon (xom, -0.28%), under Tillerson, has turned into one of Russia’s most lucrative oil provinces, affording Russia a crucial entry into the fast-growing oil markets of Asia, generating nearly $5 billion in tax dollars and other revenue for the government to date, and generally being, by Moscow’s lights, a good corporate citizen.
Indeed, if Japan and its relatives native to the habitat of eastern Siberia were in control of territories reasonable for ethno-statism, as opposed to these territories being under the control of the Russian Federation’s imperial aggrandizement, Japan and its close Asian relatives would have access to vital natural gas resources desperately needed, and could have/might still place any supplementary nuclear reactor projects in regions remote from human populations, essential habitat and tectonic fault lines.
From what I gather, The Russian Federation’s economy is based on this unjust territorial aggrandizement, resource parasitism and its raw materials sales. This is in marked contrast to the strategy of the world’s third largest economy—Japan—which builds its GNP through labor, manufacturing and technological innovation.
But it is not only Japan and natives of East Asia that the Jewy parasitism of The Russian Federation’s aggrandizement impacts—it impacts all neighbors of its vast imperial overstep, an overstep of anything remotely like a Russian ethno-state. The Russian Federation and its forerunners have done so historically, it is doing so now, in a new Jewy alliance with Trump and Tillerson, and it will continue to do so, so long as the elephant in the room is not recognized: The Russian Federation is not an ethno-state!
Haaretz, “Tillerson’s Sacking Will Shock America and the World – but Delight Israel”, 13 Mar 2018:
The secretary of state’s cardinal sin was that he didn’t kowtow to Trump to the degree that the president craves and requires.
Israel and its right wing American supporters will rejoice in the unceremonious sacking of Secretary of State Tillerson and his replacement with CIA Director Mike Pompeo.
[…]
“Mike Pompeo’s impending move to secretary of state is sure to result in a much more hawkish and confrontational U.S. policy towards Iran,” John Glaser, director of foreign policy studies at the Cato Institute, told FOX Business. “Tillerson had reliably, if unsuccessfully, pushed back against President Trump’s more aggressive instincts on Iran … Pompeo, by contrast, joined President Trump in his deep hostility to the Iran nuclear deal.”
On Tuesday afternoon, Trump mentioned the Iran deal when asked by reporters about the high-level shakeup: “When you look at the Iran deal, I think it’s terrible; I guess [Tillerson] thought it was OK. I wanted to either break it or do something, and he felt a little bit differently.
Trump fired Tillerson less than 24 hours after the Secretary fingered Russia in a murder attempt by means of chemical weapons deployment in Salisbury, England, afflicting more than 20 people.
Update 30 March 2022:
Visegrád 24 @visegrad24
Ukraine’s intelligence service reports that many of the thousands of Ukrainians who have been forcibly deported from Mariupol to Russia, have been sent to Sakhalin, near Japan.
After filtration camps, the Ukrainians are offered public jobs in Russia’s poorest regions.
DanielS: Good. Japan needs/wants that island for its gaz resource, deserves it for its indigenous peoples, hates Russia for its imperial kleptocracy of that island and Asia. Thus, Ukrainians can join forces with Japan & the west in insurgent uprising against Russia’s imperial over-reach.
Igor Shuvalov; born 4 January 1967) is a Russian politician. Since May 2018 he became the Chairman of State Development Corporation VEB.RF (Ex-Vensheconombank). From May 2012 to May 2018 he was First Deputy Prime Minister in Dmitry Medvedev’s Cabinet. Previously, he served in the same capacity in Vladimir Putin’s Second Cabinet
Government projects
Vladivostok APEC Summit 2012
In 2008, Igor Shuvalov became head of the organizing committee on preparation for the summit of the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum, which was held in Vladivostok in September 2012. Preparation for the forum involved revamping of the city’s infrastructure. The main construction sites were the cable-stayed bridge across the Eastern Bosphorus Strait to Russky Island, the cable-stayed bridge across the Zolotoy Rog Bay, and the new campus of the Far Eastern Federal University. The construction project for facilities for the summit was subjected to public criticism because of the high costs. Igor Shuvalov stated that none of the facilities built in Primorye were akin to a “Potemkin village”. According to the First Deputy Prime Minister, facilities “for the show” and “Potemkin villages” were instances of an external facade with nothing behind, while, with the facilities built in Primorye, one could “come and see for yourself – you can either work or study here”.[6]
After completion of the summit, the director of the Center for Support for Regional Initiatives for the HSE NRU (Higher School of Economics National Research University) Ivan Ognev referred to Ivan Shuvalov as the “organizer of Putin’s victories in Vladivostok, including the APEC summit of 2012, which drastically changed the city and the local mentality”.[7]
Socio-economic development of the Far East
In 2008, the Russian government established a state commission on the socio-economic development of the Far East, the Republic of Buryatia, the Transbaikal Krai, and the Irkutsk Oblast. The commission was headed by the First Deputy Prime Minister, Igor Shuvalov.[7]
In 2013, the government raised the question of whether or not the existence of the Ministry of the Russian Federation for the Development of the Far East, formed in 2012, served a useful purpose. The proposed plan for socio-economic development of the Eastern Territories prepared by the agency had not been approved by any of the key ministries, while the amount of requested appropriations was more than 5.7 trillion roubles, which was beyond the resources of the Treasury. The government returned to the idea of consolidating the faculties for the development of the Far East region within a specialized state corporation. Igor Shuvalov, who oversaw the construction of facilities for the APEC summit in Vladivostok, was among the potential candidates considered for the position of Agency Chief.
On 31 August 2013, Vladimir Putin signed a decree dismissing Viktor Ishaev from his posts as Plenipotentiary Envoy of the President of the Russian Federation to the Far Eastern Federal District, and Minister for Development of the Far East. By another decree, the head of state appointed Yuri Trutnev as both Deputy Prime Minister and Plenipotentiary Envoy of the President to the Far Eastern Federal District. The media referred to Trutnev’s appointment as a “strategic success” for Igor Shuvalov.
In April 2013, the Prime Minister of Russia, Dmitry Medvedev, signed a program covering up until 2025, for the socio-economic development of the Far East and the Transbaikal Krai. In the next 12 years approximately 10 trillion roubles will be invested in the program implementation from both the state budget and the funds of private investors.
Financial Mega-Regulator
In 2012, Igor Shuvalov proposed the idea of creating a regulator of the Russian financial markets based in the Central Bank of Russia (CBR). According to Shuvalov’s plan, the strengthened Federal Financial Markets Service that is charged with the supervision, including that of insurance companies, would be merged into CBR. The concept of creating a mega-regulator proposed by Shuvalov was approved by the Russian President, Vladimir Putin, in January 2013.[10]
Extravagant lifestyle
The press regularly covers Shuvalov’s extravagant lifestyle. The Times wrote that he “uses a £38 million private jet to transport his wife’s corgis to dog shows across Europe”.[17] In February 2018, Transparency International reported that lawyer and activist Alexei Navalny has claimed that Shuvalov owns two apartments in London’s Whitehall Court worth £11.4 million.[18] The Washington Times has covered the controversy surrounding Shuvalov’s alleged ownership of an enormous $9.4 million apartment in Moscow.[19]
Clouds over Merkel’s legacy as Russian invasion lays flaws bare
It is far worse than that. She cast clouds over the very genome of European peoples as her legacy. Vulnerability in reliance on Russian gas, naivete with regard to Putin himself, destruction and ultimate threat to the species and genus of the European genome with her migrant/ immigration policy.
Wikipedia: The Republican-controlled Senate Intelligence Committee concluded in August 2020 that Manafort’s ties to individuals connected to Russian intelligence while he was Trump’s campaign manager “represented a grave counterintelligence threat” by creating opportunities for “Russian intelligence services to exert influence over, and acquire confidential information on, the Trump campaign.”[35]
Ibid.
In August 2016, Manafort’s connections to former Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych and his pro-Russian Party of Regions drew national attention in the US, where it was reported that Manafort may have received $12.7 million in off-the-books funds from the Party of Regions.[59]
….While Victoria Nuland and PNCAC Co. would installed their western puppets, genuine Ukrainian ethnonationalists have the winds of fate against Putin’s puppets, in this case, Yanukovych.
On August 17, 2016, Trump received his first security briefing.[60] The same day, August 17, Trump shook up his campaign organization in a way that appeared to minimize Manafort’s role. It was reported that members of Trump’s family, particularly Kushner, who had originally been a strong backer of Manafort, had become uneasy about his Russian connections and suspected that he had not been forthright about them.[61]
Ibid. Manafort’s involvement in Ukraine can be traced to 2003, when Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska hired Dole, Manafort’s prior campaign candidate, to lobby the State Department for a waiver of his visa ban, primarily so that he could solicit otherwise unavailable institutional purchasers for shares in his company, RusAL. Then in early 2004, Deripaska met with Manafort’s partner, Rick Davis, also a prior campaign adviser to Bob Dole, to discuss hiring Manafort and Davis to return the former Georgian Minister of State Security, Igor Giorgadze, to prominence in Georgian politics.[88]
By December 2004, however, Deripaska shelved his plans in Georgia and dispatched Manafort to meet with Akhmetov in Ukraine to help Akhmetov and his holding firm, System Capital Management, weather the political crisis brought by the Orange Revolution.[88] Akhmetov would eventually flee to Monaco after being accused of murder, but during the crisis Manafort shepherded Akhemtov around Washington, meeting with U.S. officials like Dick Cheney.[86][87][88] Akhmetov introduced Manafort to Yanukovych, to whose political party, the Party of Regions, Akhmetov was a contributor.[89]
Lobbying for Viktor Yanukovych and involvements in Ukraine
Manafort worked as an adviser on the Ukrainian presidential campaign of Yanukovych (and his Party of Regions during the same time span) from December 2004 until the February 2010 Ukrainian presidential election,[89][90][91] even as the U.S. government (and U.S. Senator John McCain) opposed Yanukovych because of his ties to Russia’s leader Vladimir Putin.[51] Manafort was hired[by whom?] to advise Yanukovych months after massive street demonstrations known as the Orange Revolution overturned Yanukovych’s victory in the 2004 presidential race.[92] Borys Kolesnikov, Yanukovych’s campaign manager, said the party hired Manafort after identifying organizational and other problems in the 2004 elections, in which it was advised by Russian strategists.[91] Manafort rebuffed U.S. Ambassador William B. Taylor Jr. when the latter complained he was undermining U.S. interests in Ukraine.[72] According to a 2008 U.S. Justice Department annual report, Manafort’s company received $63,750 from Yanukovych’s Party of Regions over a six-month period ending on March 31, 2008, for consulting services.[93] In the 2010 election, Yanukovych managed to pull off a narrow win over Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko, a leader of the 2004 demonstrations. Yanukovych owed his comeback in Ukraine’s presidential election to a drastic makeover of his political persona, and—people in his party say—that makeover was engineered in part by his American consultant, Manafort.
Ibid.
At Manafort’s trial, federal prosecutors alleged that between 2010 and 2014 he was paid more than $60 million by Ukrainian sponsors, including Akhmetov, believed to be the richest man in Ukraine.[45]
In May 2011, Yanukovych stated that he would strive for Ukraine to join the European Union,[96] In 2013, Yanukovych became the main target of the Euromaidan protests.[97] After the February 2014 Ukrainian revolution (the conclusion of Euromaidan), Yanukovych fled to Russia.[97][98] On March 17, 2014, the day after the Crimean status referendum, Yanukovych became one of the first eleven persons who were placed under executive sanctions on the Specially Designated Nationals List (SDN)
Ibid.
According to leaked text messages between his daughters, Manafort was also one of the proponents of violent removal of the Euromaidan protesters, which resulted in police shooting dozens of people during 2014 Hrushevskoho Street riots. In one of the messages, his daughter writes that it was his “strategy that was to cause that, to send those people out and get them slaughtered.”[120]
Manafort has rejected questions about whether Kilimnik, with whom he consulted regularly, might be in league with Russian intelligence.[121] According to Yuri Shvets, Kilimnik previously worked for the GRU, and every bit of information about his work with Manafort went directly to Russian intelligence.[122]
Ibid. Manafort’s work in Ukraine coincided with the purchase of at least four prime pieces of real estate in the United States, worth a combined $11 million, between 2006 and early 2012
Russia investigations
FBI and Special Counsel investigation
The FBI reportedly began a criminal investigation into Manafort in 2014, shortly after Yanukovych was deposed during Euromaidan.[150] That investigation predated the 2016 election by several years and is ongoing. In addition, Manafort is also a person of interest in the FBI counterintelligence probe looking into the Russian government’s interference in the 2016 presidential election.[10]
On January 19, 2017, the eve of Trump’s presidential inauguration, it was reported that Manafort was under active investigation by multiple federal agencies including the Central Intelligence Agency, National Security Agency, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Director of National Intelligence, and the financial crimes unit of the Treasury Department.[151] Investigations were said to be based on intercepted Russian communications as well as financial transactions.[152] It was later confirmed that Manafort was wiretapped by the FBI “before and after the election … including a period when Manafort was known to talk to President Donald Trump.” The surveillance of Manafort began in 2014, before Donald Trump announced his candidacy for President of United States.[153]
Connection to the Trump campaign
Through numerous regular email exchanges, Kilimnik conferred with Manafort after Manafort became Donald Trump‘s campaign manager in April 2016 and requested that Manafort give “private briefings” about the Trump campaign to Oleg Deripaska, a Russian billionaire and close ally to Vladimir Putin.[19][36][37] On 2 August 2016, Kilimnik met with Manafort and Rick Gates at the Grand Havana Room at 666 Fifth Avenue.[38] The encounter which, according to prosecutor Andrew Weissmann goes “very much to the heart of what the special counsel’s office is investigating,” included a handoff by Manafort of internal polling data from Trump’s presidential campaign to Kilimnik.[39] Gates later testified the three left the premises separately, each using different exits.[39]
Ibid.
According Mueller’s court filings, Kilimnik was still working with Russian intelligence when, during September and October 2016, he was known to be communicating with the Trump campaign. Both Rick Gates and Paul Manafort were in contact with him at the time.[14] Manafort has said that he and Kilimnik discussed the Democratic National Committee cyber attack and release of emails, now known to be undertaken by Russian hacker groups known as Cozy Bear and Fancy Bear.[30]
Ibid. In January 2019, Manafort’s lawyers submitted a filing to the court, in response to the Special Counsel’s accusation that he had lied to investigators while supposedly co-operating with them. Through an error in redacting, the document accidentally revealed that while he was campaign chairman, Manafort met with Kilimnik, gave him polling data related to the 2016 campaign,[20] and discussed a Ukrainian peace plan with him. Most of the polling data was reportedly public, although some was private Trump campaign polling data.[a] Manafort asked Kilimnik to pass the data to Ukrainians Serhiy Lyovochkin and Rinat Akhmetov.[42][43] Manafort also asked Kilimnik to pass polling data to Oleg Deripaska who is close to Putin.[20]
Ibid.
The United States Senate Select Committee on Intelligence concluded in its August 2020 final report that as Trump campaign manager “Manafort worked with Kilimnik starting in 2016 on narratives that sought to undermine evidence that Russia interfered in the 2016 U.S. election” and to direct such suspicions toward Ukraine. The report characterized Kilimnik as a “Russian intelligence officer” and said Manafort’s activities represented a “grave counterintelligence threat.”[166] The investigation found:
Manafort’s presence on the Campaign and proximity to Trump created opportunities for the Russian intelligence services to exert influence over, and acquire confidential information on, the Trump Campaign. The Committee assesses that Kilimnik likely served as a channel to Manafort for Russian intelligence services, and that those services likely sought to exploit Manafort’s access to gain insight [into] the Campaign…On numerous occasions over the course of his time of the Trump Campaign, Manafort sought to secretly share internal campaign information with Kilimnik…Manafort briefed Kilimnik on sensitive campaign polling data and the campaign’s strategy for beating Hillary Clinton.[167][168]
Not only ingratiating himself with Merkel and Trump, the lightweights of the Alt-lite, Alt-Right and “Dissident Right”, but Putin would back any candidate that would destabilize and weaken significant western opposition to his aims. Thus, he would back some of the candidates brooking the anti-racist stigma on our behalf, troubling European Union power, such as Salvini and Le Pen, and so they got unfortunately, maybe tragically (regarding our stake), associated with Putin.
https://www.spectator.co.uk/article/-putin-s-brain-what-alexander-dugin-reveals-about-russia-s-leader
‘Putin’s brain’: What Alexander Dugin reveals about Russia’s leader
When the former president of Russia Dmitry Medvedev warned in recent days that Putin’s ambition in invading Ukraine was to ‘finally build an open Eurasia from Vladivostok to Lisbon’, he too was aligning himself with Ilyin and his successors. This includes men like Alexander Dugin, a former lecturer at Moscow State university, who has been labelled ‘Putin’s brain’.
In an interview with the Los Angeles Times in 2008, Dugin recalled his initial reservations about Putin. He criticised him for being ‘encircled by pro-Western, pro-liberal politicians and advisors and experts’ and condemned Putin’s support of the United States in the aftermath of 9/11. However, he also saw that, after the 2008 invasion of Georgia, Putin had passed an ‘irreversible point’. He declared that his support of Putin was ‘now absolute’.
For Dugin, the West – and the United States, in particular – is ‘the kingdom of the antichrist’. He believes the West wants to destroy Russia, to submerge it in ‘the abyss of chaos and corruption’. Fighting the West is more than a political necessity: it’s a divine calling.
Ensuring the absorption of Belarus, Kazakhstan and Ukraine into Russia then is merely the temporal part of Dugin’s vision. The more dangerous vision is of an apocalyptic battle between the forces of good (Russia) and evil (the West). The meaning of Russia is defined by this struggle where the ‘last thought of God’ will be realised through the Russian people. That thought is ‘the thought of the End of the World’. This vision of politics will not come about of its own volition. It will come about through war, which Dugin calls ‘the father of things’.
Seen in this light – and given Dugin’s influence over Putin – Russia’s aggression against its neighbors hardly comes as a surprise. When faced with this apocalyptic ideology, it’s as absurd to blame NATO for Putin’s war as it is to blame American foreign policy for radical Islamist ideology: religious fanaticism plays by its own rules.
While I had not been paying attention, this war has apparently been brewing and in conception for a number of years now. I had not been paying attention to statements made by Aleksander Dugin and find them hard to believe; someone please correct me if they are not true.
The BBC reported in July of 2014:
A prominent Russian ultra-nationalist philosopher has told BBC News that war between Russia and Ukraine “is inevitable” and has called on President Vladimir Putin to intervene militarily in eastern Ukraine “to save Russia’s moral authority”.
[…]
The centrepiece of his geopolitical theory is that Russia’s mission is to challenge US domination of the world, with help of Iran, as well as Eurosceptic parties currently on the rise in Europe.
He has been labelled the brains behind President Putin’s wildly popular annexation of Crimea.
The next step, he proclaims, is military intervention in eastern Ukraine, which he regularly calls Novorossiya (New Russia). It is a name that has also been used by President Putin.
Dugin believes the “Russian spirit” has been re-awakened by the separatist struggle there, which he calls the “Russian Spring”.
[…]
Speaking on the phone from Moscow, in clear English and with a sense of urgency in his voice, Dugin fears that the “Russian Spring” is about to lose its momentum: “It is a real mess.
“The liberals are against Putin, and the patriots support him, but only if he continues with his patriotic policies. While he is hesitating, he is losing the support of both sides. It is a dangerous game. But maybe he has a solution?”
Alexander Dugin called for the annexation of Crimea as far back as 2008, during Russia’s war with Georgia.
He travelled to the disputed region of South Ossetia, where he was photographed with a rocket launcher.
Ibid: Back then, he thinks Russia should have taken its troops all the way to the Georgian capital, Tbilisi. They should have then overthrown President Mikheil Saakashvili and moved to take over Crimea, “which is part of Russia anyway”.
Such views will offend most in Ukraine and elsewhere in the former Soviet Union. At the time, many Russians would have found them extreme. But not any more.
[…]
“The liberals are against Putin, and the patriots support him, but only if he continues with his patriotic policies. While he is hesitating, he is losing the support of both sides. It is a dangerous game. But maybe he has a solution?”
Alexander Dugin called for the annexation of Crimea as far back as 2008, during Russia’s war with Georgia.
“The liberals are against Putin, and the patriots support him, but only if he continues with his patriotic policies. While he is hesitating, he is losing the support of both sides. It is a dangerous game. But maybe he has a solution?”
Alexander Dugin called for the annexation of Crimea as far back as 2008, during Russia’s war with Georgia.
Now, with Ukrainian forces on the offensive against rebels in the Donetsk and Luhansk regions, Dugin blames “the liberals” for President Putin’s reluctance to send troops.
The “liberals”, in his view, are mainly businessmen who made their fortunes in the 1990s. If further economic sanctions are applied to Russia, they are the ones who stand to lose most because they are “integrated into the world economy”.
President Putin’s apparent hesitation, in Dugin’s view, is due to an internal struggle in the Russian government – and in President Putin’s own mind.
“This is the struggle between the patriotic, Orthodox, conservative forces – and the liberal forces, which are also very strong,” he says.
In effect, he thinks, there are two conflicting sides of Vladimir Putin
EMPR.media 1 Jan 2015:
New Greek foreign minister associated with Ruscism* ideologue
Ex-professor of Lomonosov Moscow State University Aleksandr Dugin is well-known for his position towards Ukraine and its citizens: “Today’s Ukrainians are a race of degenerates that crawled up form sewage, Genocide is in order”.
On 6 May 2014, in an interview to Anna-News information agency, Dugin clearly expressed his attitude towards Ukrainians: “To kill, to kill, to kill. There’s nothing to discuss here. This is my professor’s opinion.”
Aspen Review, 2017, On “The Wrong” and “The Right” of Ukrainans
Aleksandr Dugin, a Russian fascist philosopher and, unsurprisingly, professor at the respectable Moscow State University, has recently offered a radical recipe for a resolution of the pending Russo-Ukrainian conflict. “We should clean up Ukraine from the idiots,” he wrote on his Facebook. “The genocide of these cretins is due and inevitable… I can’t believe these are Ukrainians. Ukrainians are wonderful Slavonic people. And this is a race of bastards that emerged from the sewer manholes.”
And so Putin has overcome his “liberal” forbearance, perhaps not with the genocidal aim of Dugin, but with no doubt that there will be collateral damage and enough causalities in his war to take over Ukraine.
While Russia is apparently “winning” this war, its long term prospects would appear to be having to control and suppress genuine Ukrainian nationalism in a way that Belarus has been, but with even more bitter conflict and resistance in the long term than in Belarus. And with more support for Ukraine of that resistance from the West, which has already embarked upon sanctions that could hamper Russia significantly.
On a positive note, this over reach of the Russian Federation breathes life world wide in support of the cause for nationalisms and their sovereignty as opposed to the internationalists and their crass disregard for human ecology.
In reverse order, from most recent, I will provide a chronology of how I see events unfolding that led up to this war:
“Once KGB always KGB”
“The collapse of the soviet union was the greatest geopolitical catastrophe of the 20the century”
Former KGB agent stationed in U.S.S.R. controlled East Germany during the fall of the Soviet Union, Putin was dismayed by its collapse and the oligarchic pilfering of Russian resources during the Yeltsin years thereafter. While that NeoLiberal exploitation was real, along with NeoCon threats to deliver NATO to his doorstep in Ukraine, nor does it justify Putin’s imperialist kleptocracy and his war on a sovereign nation, another brother’s war, no less; taking the right wing kosher payoff as he would.
And Putin is able to tar the US with Israeli/Jewish tainted ops:
Clean Break, the color revolutions, Nuland’s Ukrainian Maidan initiative, etc.
That is good news for the arms industry! Dealers in death on both sides…
Klaus Schwab
Good news for the arms industry! Dealers in death Lockheed Martin, Boeing, BAE, all partners of the WEF, run by the sinister character whom Putin calls “dear Klaus” weforum.org/partners#search
And of course, he has not burned all bridges with kosher oligarchs, such as Roman Abramovich.
Roman Abramovich
Roman Arkadyevich Abramovich ( Hebrew: רומן אברמוביץ׳; born 24 October 1966)[2] is a billionaire Russian oligarch and politician.
Abramovich enriched himself in the years following the collapse of the Soviet Union, obtaining Russian state-owned assets at prices far below market value in Russia’s controversial loans-for-shares privatization program. Abramovich was a confidant of former Russian president Boris Yeltsin and current Russian leader Vladimir Putin.
Family
Abramovich’s family is Jewish. His mother, Irina Vasilievna Abramovich (née Mikhailenko), was a music teacher who died when Roman was 1 year old.[7] His father, Aron (Arkady) Abramovich Leibovich (1937−1969), worked in the economic council of the Komi ASSR.[8]
Roman’s maternal grandparents were Vasily Mikhailenko and Faina Borisovna Grutman, both born in Ukraine. It was in Saratov in the early days of World War II that Roman’s grandmother on the maternal side, Faina Borisovna Grutman, fled from Ukraine. Irina was then three years old.[9]
Roman’s paternal grandparents, Nachman Leibovich and Toybe (Tatyana) Stepanovna Abramovich, were Belarusian Jews.[9] They lived in Belarus and, after the revolution,[which?] moved to Tauragė, Lithuania,[10][11][12] with the Lithuanian spelling of the family name being Abramavičiu
Abramovich was the first person to recommend to Yeltsin that Vladimir Putin be his successor as the Russian president.[51]: 135 When Putin formed his first cabinet as Prime Minister in 1999, Abramovich interviewed each of the candidates for cabinet positions before they were approved.[34]: 102 Subsequently, Abramovich would remain one of Putin’s closest confidants. In 2007, Putin consulted in meetings with Abramovich on the question of who should be his successor as president; Medvedev was personally recommended by Abramovich.[51]: 135, 271
13:43 on Wed, 20 Nov 2019 08:20 | #
Have you seen th Russian high-tech industry?
I’ve been there. It’s in Tel Aviv.
And the reason is because the Russians do not have a civilian high-tech industry.
They do nothing but hemorrhage intellectual capital. Their intellectual capital is everywhere but Russia. Some of it is sitting right here in this room. And their high-tech industry is in Israel.
So, once again, is it Putin’s information wars? He doesn’t have a civilian high-tech industry.
He’s got some military high-tech. But nothing, compared to what The United States has, and that he’s using.” – Stephen Kotkin
Interesting Freudian slip there, on Kotkin’s part, seamlessly blending The U.S. and Israeli high-tech industry that Putin is reliant upon.
NeoSoviet puppet, Lukashenko, has presided through false elections over Belarus since a coup of Belarus’s one and so far only legitimately elected post Soviet President, Shushkevich.
Now Lukashenko is offering to help with the NeoSoviet war and oppression of Ukraine.
Lest I be accused of saying “its all the kosher folks”, their misdeeds depend on right wingers who take a payoff / liberals who take license and licentiousness.
Ukraine’s Gas executives golfing with Hunter and “Big Guy 10%” Biden. Hunter’s $83,000 a month. #Hunterukainegasdeal
Volodymyr Zelensky
Former actor and comedian who has been serving as the president of Ukraine since 2019
Early life
Volodymyr Oleksandrovych Zelenskyy was born to Jewish parents on 25 January 1978 in Kryvyi Rih, then in the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic.[14][15][16][17] His father, Oleksandr Zelenskyy, is a professor and the head of the Department of Cybernetics and Computing Hardware at the Kryvyi Rih State University of Economics and Technology; his mother, Rymma Zelenska, used to work as an engineer.[18][19][20] His grandfather, Semyon (Simon) Ivanovych Zelenskyy, served in the Red Army (in the 57th Guards Motor Rifle Division)[21] during World War II; Semyon’s father and three brothers were murdered in the Holocaust.
TOO, Jewish Subtexts in Ukraine, by Andrew Joyce, PhD:
Ihor Kolomoyskyi
If Putin was in fact looking for a mega-rich, influential cabal-operating Ukrainian Jew guilty of perpetrating violence against Russians, he wouldn’t have to look much further than Ihor Kolomoyskyi. It didn’t surprise me when I read a couple of days ago that the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation (Russia’s FBI) has initiated more than 400 criminal cases targeting Ukrainian officials, military servicemen, and volunteer fighters, and that Kolomoyskyi was on the list.
Russia has been trying to get it hands on Kolomoyskyi since 2014. Kolomoyskyi, who owns Ukraine’s biggest bank, plus airlines, huge stakes of Ukrainian media, and other companies, was accused in July 2014 of founding and funding Dnipro-1 Special Tasks Patrol Police Battalion. The unit was held responsible by Amnesty International in December of the same year for blocking food aid, and attempting to starve the Russian-speaking populations of the separatist “republics” of Donetsk and Luhansk. Operating under the mask of Ukrainian patriotism, Kolomoyskyi, who offered bounties of thousands of dollars for Russian separatists, was in fact trying to stem the separatist movement so that it wouldn’t expand to the heartland of his business interests, his home city of Dnipropetrovsk. Together with fellow Jew Hennadiy Korban, who was later investigated for embezzlement and exiled to Israel, the pair “not only made political capital by saving [Dnipropetrovsk] from war, but used this emergence of Dnipropetrovsk as a ‘pro-Ukrainian’ city to protect [Kolomoyskyi’s] business interests.”
Kolomoyskyi’s Ukrainian “patriotism” and anti-Russian attitudes had already been significantly inflamed by the 2014 seizure of his assets in Crimea by the new Russian authorities. In 2016, RT reported that the authorities would sell the assets in order to compensate residents of Crimea who had been exploited by Kolomoyskyi’s PrivatBank:
Twenty businesses formerly owned by Ukrainian oligarch Igor Kolomoisky will be sold by the Crimean authorities. The region’s government is seeking to compensate people who lost money in Ukrainian banks, mostly Kolomoisky’s PrivatBank. Crimea’s Deputy Speaker Konstantin Bakharev says the oligarch’s assets will be sold by year-end for 2 billion rubles (about $30 million). “The money will be transferred to the depositor protection fund for compensation payments to residents of the Crimea, whose deposits in the Ukrainian banks exceeded 700,000 rubles ($10,500),” he said.
When then-President Petro Poroshenko nationalized Kolomoyskyi’s PrivatBank (which was also operated by fellow Jew Gennadiy (Zvi Hirsch) Bogolyubov) in 2016, Kolomoyskyi threw his influence behind fellow Jew and popular actor Volodymyr Zelenskyy, now a hero and darling of the Western media. Zelenskyy’s campaign, strangely enough, began with his appearance on Kolomoyskyi’s media channel as the star of the television series Servant of the People, where he played the role of the president of Ukraine. In the series, Zelenskyy’s character was a high-school history teacher in his 30s who won the presidential election after a viral video showed him ranting against government corruption in Ukraine. In retrospect, the show was a masterwork of social engineering and life imitating art. Reuters later reported:
One of Ukraine’s most popular TV channels 1+1, owned by oligarch Ihor Kolomoisky, has given Zelenskiy a powerful platform in recent months during his meteoric rise to the brink of the presidency. On Saturday, a day before Zelenskiy won the first round of the presidential contest and set up a run-off with the incumbent Petro Poroshenko, 1+1 filled its schedule with back-to-back shows by the comedian and actor.
There was initially some unease that the whole thing might be too obvious. “There are legitimate reasons to worry about the future of Ukrainian Jewry,” said Vladislav Davidzon, the editor-in-chief of the magazine Odessa Review. “Having a Jewish president, who is also backed by a picaresque Jewish oligarch might cause any failings to be directed at the Jewish community.” He needn’t have worried. Zelenskyy sky-rocketed to prominence, and one of his earliest measures was to nominate fellow Jew Volodymyr Groysman as Prime Minister and target Poroshenko, setting in motion a sequence of events that would result in the reversal of the nationalization of PrivatBank and the return of the bank to Kolomoyskyi. Although posturing as an anti-corruption populist, Zelenskyy’s links to Kolomoyskyi have continued to dog him, and in October 2021 it was revealed via the Pandora Papers that Zelenskyy, who constantly denied that he was a “puppet” of the Jewish oligarch, and his associates had received $40 million into offshore accounts from funds linked to Kolomoyskyi.
Kolomoyskyi and his creation
Most of this money has been bled from the Ukrainian people. Kolomoyskyi, who acted as President of the United Jewish Community of Ukraine, generously shared his wealth with Jews worldwide, and founded the European Jewish Union with Vadim Rabinovich, has been investigated for years by both the FBI and America’s Justice Department, in particular for pursuing a “vast scheme to steal millions of dollars from Ukraine’s largest bank and move the money into the U.S. to buy steel mills and skyscrapers.” In a special investigation, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette reported last week that Kolomoyskyi’s efforts to launder stolen Ukrainian money in the United States, via his Jewish associates in South Florida Mordechai “Motti” Korf and Uriel Laber, left a wake of economic devastation:
One of the richest men in Ukraine, the 59-year-old oligarch is accused of setting up shell companies, cleaning the money through U.S. properties and ultimately leaving a trail of boarded-up buildings, failed steel facilities, and millions in unpaid property taxes, court records show. While money was transferred into the country for one of the oligarch’s companies, his operators shut down Warren Steel in Ohio in 2016, owing millions in property taxes, utility bills and supplies. For weeks, workers were left without medical coverage because the insurance premium wasn’t paid, records and interviews show. “A lot of people left here very angry,” said Nancy Waselich, a former IT manager for the factory. “People bled for this place.” Though no one so far has been criminally charged, prosecutors have filed legal actions to seize properties that they allege were bought with money stolen from the Ukraine bank, where Mr. Kolomoisky was a major shareholder.
Fedin Shandor, a professor at Uzhgorod University and adviser to the government on tourist development, has described Kolomoyskyi as “a leech who sucks our blood here and puts it in Switzerland.” This “leech” has also made a game for years of poking Vladimir Putin, stating publicly in 2014 that Putin was “a schizophrenic shorty. He is completely inadequate. He has completely lost his mind. His messianic drive to recreate the Russian empire of 1913 or the USSR of 1991 could plunge the world into catastrophe.”
Video: pro-Russians vs. pro-Ukrainians upon Russia’s Crimean take-over.
2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine
On 25 February 2022, amid the 2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine, Poroshenko appeared on TV with a Kalashnikov rifle together with the civil defense forces on the streets of Kyiv. He also stated that he believed that “Putin will never conquer Ukraine, no matter how many soldiers he has, how many missiles he has, how many nuclear weapons he has… We Ukrainians are a free people, with a great European future. This is definitely so.
Petro Poroshenko, Ukrainian President, 2014 – 2019
Billionaires lists rankings
In March 2012, Forbes placed him on the Forbes list of billionaires at 1,153rd place, with US$1 billion.[34] As of May 2015, Poroshenko’s net worth was about US$720 million (Bloomberg estimate), losing 25 percent of his wealth because of Russia’s ban of Roshen products and the state of the Ukrainian economy.
According to the annual ranking of the richest people in Ukraine,[36] published in October 2015 by the Ukrainian journal Novoye Vremya and conducted jointly with Dragon Capital, a leading investment company in Ukraine, president Poroshenko was found to be the only one from the top ten list whose asset value grew since the previous year’s ranking. The estimate of his assets was set at US$979 million, a 20% growth, and his ranking increased from 9th to 6th wealthiest person in Ukraine. The article observed that Poroshenko remained one of the only two European leaders who owned a business empire of such scale, with Silvio Berlusconi of Italy being the other.
Poroshenko actively and financially supported the Euromaidan protests between November 2013 and February 2014,[26] leading to an upsurge in his popularity, although[26] he did not participate in negotiations between then President Yanukovych and the Euromaidan parliamentary opposition parties Batkivshchyna, Svoboda and UDAR.[26]
Presidency
When it became clear he had won the election on election day evening (on 25 May 2014) Poroshenko announced his “first presidential trip will be to Donbas“, where armed pro-Russian rebels had declared the separatist republics Donetsk People’s Republic and Luhansk People’s Republic and control part of the region.[81][90] Poroshenko also vowed to continue the military operations by the Ukrainian government forces to end the armed insurgency claiming: “The anti-terrorist operation cannot and should not last two or three months. It should and will last hours.”[91] He compared the armed pro-Russian rebels to Somali pirates.[91] Poroshenko also called for negotiations with Russia in the presence of international intermediaries.[91] Russia responded by saying it did not need an intermediary in its bilateral relations with Ukraine.[91] As president-elect, Poroshenko promised to return Crimea,[91] which was annexed by Russia in March 2014.[90][92][a] He also vowed to hold new parliamentary elections in 2014.
According to Poroshenko (and Rothschild Wealth Management & Trust) since becoming President of Ukraine he has relinquished the management of his businesses, ultimately (in January 2016) to a blind trust
Roshen Owners and management
Participating in the 2014 presidential election in Ukraine, Petro Poroshenko announced his intention to sell Roshen after the victory, in the avoidance of any conflicts of interest. At a press conference on June 5, 2015 in Kyiv, Petro Poroshenko assured that he intends to transfer his stake in the confectionery corporation “Roshen” to the management of a private investment banking company N M Rothschild & Sons, owned by the Rothschild family. In January 2016, he announced the signing of an agreement on the transfer of these shares.
NATO
Poroshenko with NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg in Kyiv, 10 July 2017
At his speech at the opening session of the new parliament on 27 November 2014, Poroshenko stated “we’ve decided to return to the course of NATO integration” because “the nonalignment status of Ukraine proclaimed in 2010 couldn’t guarantee our security and territorial integrity”
CRIMEA’S ILLEGAL ANNEXATION
Ukraine’s Maidan Revolution ended in late February 2014, when President Victor Yanukovych fled Kyiv — later to turn up in Russia — and the Rada (Ukraine’s parliament) appointed an acting president and acting prime minister to take charge. They made clear their intention to draw Ukraine closer to Europe by signing an association agreement with the European Union.
Things moved quickly. By early March, Russian troops had secured the entire peninsula. On March 6, the Crimean Supreme Council voted to ask to accede to Russia.
Moscow maintains a historical claim to Crimea. The Russians colonized Crimea during the reign of Catherine the Great, and they founded Sevastopol — the peninsula’s main port and largest city — to be the homeport for the Russian Black Sea Fleet. Following the establishment of the Soviet Union, Crimea was a part of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic until 1954 (by then Soviet head of state Krushchev, who was of Ukrainian extraction himself), when it was transferred administratively to the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic.
_38.jpg)
Maidan Revolution – perhaps a more genuine outpouring of public indignation over Yanukovich’s pull in the Russian direction than appeared to me, and yet the hallmarks of chutzpah are more like opportunistic casuistry, which co-opt grassroots motives and re-directs them.
Yanukovych: governor of Donetsk Oblast, eastern Ukraine 1997-2002; elected President in 2010 over (((Yulia Tymoshenko. Ousted 2013, having rejected EU association agreement, choosing ties to Russia; prompting “Euromaidan” to align Ukraine with the EU.
Yanukoviych is now exiled in Russia
Soros liberal oligarchic interests backed “the orange revolution” to overturn Russia’s corrupt election strategy and in re-vote, Yushchenko won; but it made way for Western corruption to take hold in Ukraine. Russia called Yuschenko “a Nazi” despite his history of opposing Nazism.
2004: Viktor Yuschenko’s political platform added social partnership and other liberal slogans to older ideas of European integration, including Ukraine joining NATO and fighting corruption. Russia’s man, Yanakovich, and agents, responded by poisoning Yuschenko with agent orange (dioxin).
Bush the second “looked into the eyes of Vladimir Putin and saw the depth of his soul.” How about you saw the abyss of a dictator presiding over an imperialist kleptocracy, whose evil propensity for killing and destruction when he did not have to was only exacerbated by your being beholden to advice of the (((NeoCons))) to provoke him.
Belarusian President, Shushkevich (center) who drafted the accords, a true Belarusian nationalist, became the first president of Belarus upon the dissolution of the Soviet Union, but was ousted and replaced by NeoSoviet Russian puppet Lukashenko.
Left, Leonic Kuchma’s presidency followed Kravchuk in Ukraine and was surrounded by corruption scandals and lessening media freedoms; until finally Russia tried unsuccessfully to steal the 2004 election for Russia’s man, Yanukovich, over western leaning Yuschenko – poisoning him (dioxin) good old fashioned KGB style, but failing to assassinate him in that effort.
And Yeltsin, right, was ousted by Putin. (Abramovich was instrumental to Putin gaining approval as Yeltsin’s successor).
Ukraine was of vital strategic importance to The Soviet Union, particularly for military positioning on the warm water port of the Black Sea and for the food product of its fertile soil.
Lazar Kaganovich, proprietor of the Holodomor (It’s been said, but needs to be confirmed whether or not he is a direct relative of the Kagans), which starved millions, Russians and Ukrainians en mass for the Soviet program of confiscating private farms and their product for shipment to Moscow. Also in need of verification is whether or not the heavy Russian population of Eastern Ukraine are a replacement population where there once were Ukrainians (starved by the Holodomor).
…
Of ancient history, while Ukrainians and Russians are closely related they are clearly different enough genetically and culturally, historically distinguishing events and so on to constitute different nations. Important to mention because Putin and The Soviet strategy has been to minimize this difference (in fact, Putin calls Ukraine a “fake” country).
At he behest of comrade Marx, the “anti-racist (anti-ethnonationalist) Trotsky and bio-Lenin, would see progress no other way but toward the withering away of the state, viz., Ukrainian state.
Reflections
I’m taking a step back from this. Putin’s war is to install a puppet like Lukashenko in Belarus, but Ukrainians can survive in tact to retake their ethnonation in the long haul rather than suffer vast destruction for a rapid NeoCon/NeoLiberal war against Putin that can escalate catastrophically.
On the other hand we should not step too far back from the fact that this is an ethnonational fight over the long haul. Thus, we should not be lulled into complacency to be supplicants of the likes of Gottfried and Mearsheimer through third tier “philosophizing” of acolytes such as Joel Davis.
As if Mearsheimer is the only one capable of deducing that direct confrontation of Putin is not the best strategy at this point, some, such as Joel Davis and Kevin MacDonald, (that later of whom is otherwise largely excellent and consonant with my own take on the war’s causality and what is to be done), gloss over the long term aims of Mearsheimer, decidedly Not ethnonational.
(52:54): “If you talk to most people who study Europe today and spend lots of time over there, they are quite pessimistic about where Europe is headed – not only regarding Eastern Europe, but also with regard to Western Europe. And I’m not sure in twenty five years what it will all look like. I mean, in my opinion, the biggest issue is demographic; and that Europeans have not been making lots of babies for a long time and as a result they are going to have to import lots of people; and these are countries that do not have a rich history of integrating people in a smooth way, much the way the United States does. And its no accident that now you are beginning to see the rise of ‘far right’ parties all across Europe because of all of the immigration.
So, one could paint a pretty bleak picture about Europe’s future. But the counter to that would be, we’ve now got all those countries, like Romania, like the Czech Republic, like Slovakia, embedded in these institutions that will go to great lengths to combat those tendencies; and in a more incremental way, facilitate spread of liberal democracy and capitalism.”
Nevertheless, those who would hope to look upon Putin as the bastion against liberalism and the savior of White Nationalism need to take a look at this U.N. Proposal coming from Putin’s sphere:
A leading scholarly proponent of the liberal democratic expansionist enterprise, Yale historian Timothy Snyder, has put forth a unique suggestion in order to try to worm his way out of the box that he’s painted himself into from his liberal position. In making the astute claim that Putin’s rhetoric, i.e., that “Ukraine is not a real nation” is the rhetoric that precedes genocide, he is confronted with the fact that liberals have been saying that “the White race” (European diaspora) is not real and that ethnonationalism is not the real state of affairs of European nations, he has to render the unique idea that “ethnonationalism is about language.” Has anyone ever said ethnonationalism is about language, and not about biology and genetic difference?
Despite any diverting to the red herring of debunked “collusion”, it is sure that Putin wanted Trump to win (and had Trump tangled up with “Russian” debt) and put operatives to cyberwar in an effort for a Trump win, with help from YKW, who wanted Trump to kill The Iran Deal.
The Muller Report failed in making this an issue of Trump colluding with Putin and finding that inconclusive, when in fact, Russia’s military people waged a very successful campaign of social media influence. … farmed out some of the effort Cambridge Analytica and the Israelis.
With the half Jewish bastards of Ukrainian whores not having most favored status in Israel, what better task for them to subvert nativist leadership, especially of Ukraine, of course, to put into effect another Israeli “clean break” (PNAC) outpost. Epstein’s project apparently would connect.
Mitt Romney Lambasts Tulsi Gabbard for Claim of Bioweapons Labs
Tulsi Gabbard’s ‘treasonous lies’ could ‘cost lives’ after she claimed the US is operating labs making nuclear weapons in Ukraine
Sen. Mitt Romney blasted former Rep. Tulsi Gabbard for telling ‘treasonous lies’
She said the U.S. was funding ’25 to 30′ biological labs in Ukraine
The Kremlin raised similar claims last week in what Administration warned could be pretext for further Russian attacks on Ukraine
U.S. and Ukraine both deny the US is funding bioresearch there
‘Tulsi Gabbard is parroting false Russian propaganda.
Her treasonous lies may well cost lives,’ tweeted Romney
Romney, an American “oligarch”, with son’s hands directly sullied in Ukrainian oil business, like Biden, Kerry and Pelosi, can hardly be considered the voice of virtue, as he calls war mongering (((Zelensky))) a hero, a “hero” to be supported in requests for a bigger and bigger Jew harvest (European dead), the very reason that these Right-Wingers and Neo-Liberals require a reckoning.
Tucker Carleson responds in defense of Tulsi Gabbard
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FY0P8Tmj73I
While no excuse for Putin’s invasion, (((Robert Kagan))) – NeoCon co-author of “operation clean break” (aka “Project for a New American Century”), and husband of fellow war monger, (((Viktoria Nuland))), the undersecretary under Biden’s Secretary of State, (((Blinken))) – acknowledges provocation of neocons, but not destruction to our peoples; in fact, calls for all out war.
Our seniors are fighters who deserve to be respected. These are for example the old soldiers whose honor you have trampled on in recent weeks. It is these thousands of servants of France, signatories of a platform of common sense, soldiers who gave their best years to defend our freedom, obeying your orders, to wage your wars or to implement your budget restrictions. , which you soiled while the people of France supported them.
These people who fought against all the enemies of France, you have treated them as factious when their only fault is to love their country and to mourn its visible downfall.
The list also includes several Orthodox groups such as the Uri L’Tzedek social justice organization and Yaffed, an advocacy group that seeks to improve secular education in Hasidic schools.
